2016
DOI: 10.17103/redi.68.1.2016.3b.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1.1. Competencia judicial internacional: insolvencia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…147 The Eurofood case 148 affirmed the basic premise of the OR: 149 'one company, one insolvency, one proceeding'. 150 Consequently, Eurofood considerably reduced the possibility of procedural consolidation. 151 Although Interedil mitigated the latter stricter approach, 152 it was not sufficient to overcome the registered office presumption.…”
Section: D) Groups Of Companiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…147 The Eurofood case 148 affirmed the basic premise of the OR: 149 'one company, one insolvency, one proceeding'. 150 Consequently, Eurofood considerably reduced the possibility of procedural consolidation. 151 Although Interedil mitigated the latter stricter approach, 152 it was not sufficient to overcome the registered office presumption.…”
Section: D) Groups Of Companiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…194 When it comes to secured creditors and rights in rem in particular, immunity rules 195 may contradict fairness and encourage stalemates that may ultimately jeopardise the outcome of a restructuring. 196 These conflicts are further enhanced by legislative competition among MSs. 197 The disparities of substantive insolvency rules among MSs hamper the coordination of different proceedings.…”
Section: The Golden Thread: Substantive Harmonisationmentioning
confidence: 99%