2008
DOI: 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2008.34.353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The study assessed the effect of phytase on the digestibility of alternative plant feed ingredients Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa) and leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala) leaf meal fed to tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) and on fish growth. Five treatments were used: UPI denoted the negative control diet with unfermented plant ingredients; UPIP was positive control diet with unfermented plant ingredient supplemented with 3 g/kg phosphorus (NaH 2 PO 4 ); FPI indicated diet with fermented plant ingredien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported for jundia, the investigations carried out with tambaqui used RAS as an experimental system to evaluate other productive management systems or parameters, and they were not specifically designed to evaluate the growth performance of tambaqui in such systems. These studies mainly focused on nutrition (Paulino et al 2018;Júnior et al 2017;Nwanna et al 2008), reproduction (Gallego et al 2017;Maria et al 2015), management (Dantas et al 2020;da Costa et al 2019), behaviour (Reis et al 2019;Barbosa et al 2009), genetics (Ariede et al 2020;da Silva et al 2019) and health (Barbas et al 2020;Paz et al 2019). Lima et al (2019) evaluated different stocking densities of tambaqui juveniles in RAS.…”
Section: Tambaqui (Colossoma Macropomum)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported for jundia, the investigations carried out with tambaqui used RAS as an experimental system to evaluate other productive management systems or parameters, and they were not specifically designed to evaluate the growth performance of tambaqui in such systems. These studies mainly focused on nutrition (Paulino et al 2018;Júnior et al 2017;Nwanna et al 2008), reproduction (Gallego et al 2017;Maria et al 2015), management (Dantas et al 2020;da Costa et al 2019), behaviour (Reis et al 2019;Barbosa et al 2009), genetics (Ariede et al 2020;da Silva et al 2019) and health (Barbas et al 2020;Paz et al 2019). Lima et al (2019) evaluated different stocking densities of tambaqui juveniles in RAS.…”
Section: Tambaqui (Colossoma Macropomum)mentioning
confidence: 99%