2011
DOI: 10.1016/s1878-6480(11)70049-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

047 Are the patients benefiting from a coronarography well-informed? Evaluation of written information efficacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Telephone, e-mail and text message [32], Information leaflet [33], Health-literacy based consent form designed to facilitate two-way discussion between doctor and patient [34], Providing patients with audiotape recording of their pre-operative consultation [35], Interactive computer based information presentation [36] and Video presentation [37], consultation of patient groups [38], testing the scripted verbal or written consent versus web-based, audiovisual presentation [39], continuous consent, whereby information is given gradually over a period of time [40], prospective informed consent in high-risk groups [41], community consultation on appropriate means of obtaining consent [42]. The evidence for such solutions is inadequate as far as these studies lack of blinding, in addition to publication bias.…”
Section: Compulsion Eliminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Telephone, e-mail and text message [32], Information leaflet [33], Health-literacy based consent form designed to facilitate two-way discussion between doctor and patient [34], Providing patients with audiotape recording of their pre-operative consultation [35], Interactive computer based information presentation [36] and Video presentation [37], consultation of patient groups [38], testing the scripted verbal or written consent versus web-based, audiovisual presentation [39], continuous consent, whereby information is given gradually over a period of time [40], prospective informed consent in high-risk groups [41], community consultation on appropriate means of obtaining consent [42]. The evidence for such solutions is inadequate as far as these studies lack of blinding, in addition to publication bias.…”
Section: Compulsion Eliminationmentioning
confidence: 99%