“…There have been several motivations for new developments of laboratory-based ultra-sensitive radioanalytical techniques in nuclear and environmental studies: (i) Levels of anthropogenic radionuclides after over 60 years of their injection to the environment have decreased considerably [ 1 – 4 , 18 – 20 ]; (ii) Sample size required for radiometric analyses should be comparable to mass spectrometry analyses (e.g. in seawater profile sampling Rosette systems with 10–20 L bottles should be used instead of large 200 L (for 137 Cs) or 400 L (for Pu isotopes) sampling containers [ 1 , 3 , 4 , 21 – 26 ]; (iii) Highly accurate, precise and traceable data are required for environmental and climate change studies, which would require detection limits below 1 nBq/g [ 1 – 4 , 27 – 31 ]; (iv) New scientific ideas—such as investigations of rare nuclear processes and decays, investigations of cosmic dust, solar variations, supernova explosions, deep-sea bottom studies, DNA studies, environmental biotechnology, environmental nanotechnology, climate change studies, etc., have not been possible to realize till now as they have been requiring new ultra-sensitive radioanalytical technologies [ 32 – 38 ], with sensitivities good enough to analyse even very small samples.…”