Untitled

Burgess, Ann Wolbert; Harner, Holly M.; Baker, Timothy B.; Hartman, Carol R.; Lole, Christopher

doi:10.1023/a:1011142400853

Cited by 25 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Three percent reported making threats and 6% indicated that they perpetrated physical violence against their ex-partner. An overall rate of stalking was not provided (Burgess, Harner, Baker, Hartman, & Lole, 2001). A handful of studies have examined PRS in samples of known female IPV victims, finding victimization prevalence rates of 48% (Edwards & Gidycz, 2014), 49% (Ornstein & Rickne, 2013), and 75% (Langhinrichsen-Rohling, 2006).…”

Section: The Link Between Ipv and Prsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies on the link between IPV and PRS in male victims, which is a significant limitation given that men constitute a significant minority of all stalking victims (Spitzberg et al, 2010; Tjaden & Thoennes, 1998) and a substantial number of IPV victims (Desmarais et al, 2012a). Most studies are also limited by highly selective samples such as self-identified victims (Brewster, 2000; Ferreira & Matos, 2013; Langhinrichsen-Rohling, 2006) and perpetrators involved with the criminal justice system or clinical services (Brooks, 2010; Burgess et al, 2001; McEwan et al, 2017; Morrison, 2008; Nicastro et al, 2000), potentially leading to bias in the results.…”

Section: The Link Between Ipv and Prsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessing the Link Between Intimate Partner Violence and Postrelationship Stalking: A Gender-Inclusive Study

Senkans

McEwan

Ogloff

2017

J Interpers Violence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The link between intimate partner violence (IPV) during a relationship and postrelationship stalking (PRS) is poorly understood. The vast majority of relevant studies focus either on male perpetration or female victimization and use highly selective samples. The current study aimed to illuminate the link between IPV and PRS perpetration and victimization, respectively. To this end, heterosexual male and female university students ( n = 422) retrospectively self-reported on IPV during their most conflicted relationship and a wide range of pursuit behavior after the dissolution of this romantic relationship. Using empirical criteria, participants were classified as stalkers or nonstalkers based on their responses. A relationship between male-perpetrated IPV and PRS perpetration was detected. There was no systematic relationship between IPV and PRS perpetration in women. In contrast, there was a link between IPV and stalking victimization that followed a similar, linear trend in both male and female victims. A larger proportion of participants were classified as stalking victims as IPV severity increased. Implications for research (e.g., the importance of gender-inclusive studies), clinical practice (e.g., how to prevent stalking after an abusive relationship), and future directions (e.g., the need for prospective studies using more diverse samples) are discussed.

show abstract