1996
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.53.2272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

0° binary encounter electron production in 30-MeVOq++H2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even in the case of many-electron targets such as Ne, Ar, Xe, and Kr [81], as well as complicated molecules [82], in which electrons from different shells can contribute with different Compton profiles and binding energies, the ESM has also been shown to be a good approximation. Earlier studies of the Coulomb or BEe contributions in collisions with nonbare or clothed ions have also shown the validity of the ESM [83,84]. The nonresonant part of the DDCS from the sum of all three terms for 180°is known to increase with decreasing q [44], an effect first explained in terms of classical scattering glory effects [85] and consistent with the full quantal R-matrix treatment provided by the above Eqs.…”
Section: Sdcssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even in the case of many-electron targets such as Ne, Ar, Xe, and Kr [81], as well as complicated molecules [82], in which electrons from different shells can contribute with different Compton profiles and binding energies, the ESM has also been shown to be a good approximation. Earlier studies of the Coulomb or BEe contributions in collisions with nonbare or clothed ions have also shown the validity of the ESM [83,84]. The nonresonant part of the DDCS from the sum of all three terms for 180°is known to increase with decreasing q [44], an effect first explained in terms of classical scattering glory effects [85] and consistent with the full quantal R-matrix treatment provided by the above Eqs.…”
Section: Sdcssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Thus, the overall absolute DDCS error can be expected to be around 10-15% [47], which explains the very nice agreement seen between theory and experiment throughout the spectrum. The absolute DDCSs obtained were finally transformed to the projectile rest frame according to the kinematic transformations [84] = ͓ ͱ L − ͱ t͔ 2 ,…”
Section: B Determination Of the Absolute Ddcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The C K-Auger electrons show up as a circle centered at p. The P process shows only a moderate enhancement at forward angles. This deviation from the 1st-Born results is due to the non-Coulomb projectile field [18,19]. The P-T process is clearly observable at backward angles.…”
Section: -2 073201-2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three regimes are defined as the adiabatic or slow (V p v e ) regime, the intermediate (V p ≈ v e ) regime and the high-energy or fast (V p v e ) [63] regime. As a point of reference, the electron velocities of He (or H 2 ) are 3.73 mm/ns (3.35 mm/ns for H 2 ), 0.073 MeV/u (or 0.058 MeV/u) and 1.70 au (or 1.53 au) [64], while the projectile velocities of this thesis are in the range of 9.82-15.52 mm/ns (0.5-1.25 MeV/u or 4.49-7.09 au). One of the first methods developed for charge transfer and ionization calculations was the Classical Trajectory Monte Carlo (CTMC) method [65], applicable in the intermediate energy regime.…”
Section: The Process Of Electron Capturementioning
confidence: 99%