The facial allotransplantation technique was first introduced to the general public in 2005. The definition of the face as a complex system of organs that perform social functions made possible the adaptation of this operation into clinical practice. The year 2010 was the starting point for initial research in the Russian Federation. Based on previous achievements and existing world experience in this field, facial allotransplantation was used for the first time in 2015 in St. Petersburg. The goal of this operation was to reconstruct a soldier’s central facial area after an electric burn; he was injured in the military line of duty. This article describes complications faced regarding the preparation for this operation, the issues encountered for facial tissue removal, as well as donor selection criteria. Each stage of the composite facial allotransplantation, complications that can occur during operation, milestone results, as well as the subsequent rehabilitation and immunosuppressive therapy during the 4-year patient observation period following surgery, including the description of a single episode of cell-humoral rejection of transplanted tissue, are described in detail. The experience gained from the first facial allotransplantation performed in Russia shows the possibility of using a new composite allograft to correct deformities in the central area of the face with the achievement of a successfully functioning and aesthetically pleasing result after the operation. After 4 years of dynamic observation and individual rehabilitation programs, the main goal of the facial transplantation, that is, social re-adaptation of the patient, was achieved.
BACKGROUND: The circle of Willis (CW) is an important network of collaterals that provide compensatory redistribution of hemodynamic load. Several studies showed that the CW is open in approximately 50%90% of cases, and the number of missing segments correlates with low brain tolerance to ischemia in internal carotid artery (ICA) compression. Currently, studies dedicated to the relationship of different configurations of CW with the risk of ischemic brain damage. AIM: The analyze the immediate results of eversion carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with different configurations of the structure of the CW. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 641 patients with hemodynamically significant stenosis of the internal carotid arteries (ICA) in a study period from 2010 to 2020. All patients underwent multispiral computed tomography with angiography of the extracranial and CW arteries. Based on the structural variants of the CW, six groups of patients were studied: group 1 (64.9%, n = 416) closed posterior part (CPP) with the existence of posterior communicative artery (PCA) and P1 segment of the posterior cerebral artery (PCerA); group 2 (27%, n = 173) an intermediate structure of the posterior part (IPP) with hypoplasia of the PCA or PCerA; group 3 (8.1%, n = 52) open posterior part (OPP) with the absence of PCA or PCerA; group 4 (85.95%, n = 551) closed anterior part (CAP) with the presence of the anterior communicating artery (ACA) and A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery (ACerA); group 5 (7.95%, n = 51) an intermediate structure of the anterior part (IAP) with hypoplasia of ACA or ACerA; group 6 (6.1%, n = 39) open anterior part (OAP) with the absence of ACA or ACerA. To assess the compensatory potentials of the brain, all patients underwent measurement of the retrograde pressure in the ICA and intraoperative cerebral oximetry. RESULTS: In the postoperative period, 1 death was recorded in group 4 (CAP) due to a hemorrhagic transformation in the zone of ischemic stroke, on the background development of hyperperfusion syndrome. The largest number of ischemic strokes of the cardioembolic subtype was diagnosed in the ACerA territory in the presence of an unstable atherosclerotic plaque: group 1 (CPP) 0%; group 2 (IPP) 0%; group 3 (OPP) 0.24%, n = 1; group 4 (CAP) 0.18%, n = 1; group 5 (IAP) 1.96%, n = 1; group 6 (OAP) 5.1%, n = 2; p 0.9999. The probable cause was embolization against the background increase in the arterial pressure before ICA clamping. In turn, the majority of ischemic strokes of the hemodynamic subtype developed in the territory of PCerA: group 1 (CPP) 0%; group 2 (IPP) 1.73%, n = 3; group 3 (OPP) 3.8%, n = 2; group 4 (CAP) 0.18%, n = 1; group 5 (IAP) 0%; group 6 (OAP) 2.56%, n = 1; p 0.9999. This pattern coincided with the largest number of patients with CW of the IPP and OPP types among all open variants of the structure. CONCLUSION: Parameters of retrograde pressure in the ICA and intraoperative cerebral oximetry do not always demonstrate the need for a temporary shunt (TS). Due to the opened structure of CW, the redistribution of blood flow occurs with the formation of zones of hypo- and hyperperfusion, causing ischemic alterations in the brain matter. Thus, in order to maintain adequate cerebral hemodynamics, to mitigate the effect of hypo- and hyperperfusion, and reduce the risk of ischemic stroke, the open variant of the CW structure should be considered as an indication for a TS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.