We sought to measure the clinical benefits of adrenal venous sampling (AVS), a test recommended by guidelines for primary aldosteronism (PA) patients seeking surgical cure, in a large registry of PA patients submitted to AVS. Data of 1625 consecutive patients submitted to AVS in 19 tertiary referral centers located in Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America were collected in a large multicenter international registry. The primary end points were the rate of bilateral success, ascertained lateralization of PA, adrenalectomy, and of cured arterial hypertension among AVS-guided and non AVS-guided adrenalectomy patients. AVS was successful in 80.1% of all cases but allowed identification of unilateral PA in only 45.5% by the criteria in use at each center. Adrenalectomy was performed in 41.8% of all patients and cured arterial hypertension in 19.6% of the patients, 2-fold more frequently in women than men ( P <0.001). When AVS-guided, surgery provided a higher rate of cure of hypertension than when non-AVS-guided (40.0% versus 30.5%; P =0.027). Compared with surgical cases, patients treated medically needed more antihypertensive medications ( P <0.001) and exhibited a higher rate of persistent hypokalemia requiring potassium supplementation (4.9% versus 2.3%; P <0.01). The low rate of adrenalectomy and cure of hypertension in PA patients seeking surgical cure indicates suboptimal AVS use, possibly related to issues in patient selection, technical success, and AVS data interpretation. Given the better outcomes of AVS-guided adrenalectomy, these results call for actions to improve the diagnostic use of this test that is necessary for detection of surgical PA candidates. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01234220.

Context Impaired diurnal blood pressure (BP) variability is related to higher cardiovascular risk. Objective To assess diurnal variability of BP and its relation to target organ damage (TOD) and catecholamine phenotype in a consecutive sample of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL). Design We included 179 patients with PPGL All patients underwent 24 hours of ambulatory BP monitoring to determine dipping status. Differences in plasma metanephrine or urine adrenaline were used to distinguish catecholamine biochemical phenotype. To evaluate TOD, renal functions, presence of left ventricle hypertrophy (LVH), and the subgroup (n = 111) carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) were assessed. Structural equation modeling was used to find the relationship among nocturnal dipping, catecholamine phenotype, and TOD parameters. Results According to the nocturnal dipping, patients were divided into the three groups: dippers (28%), nondippers (40%), and reverse dippers (32%). Reverse dippers were older (P < 0.05), with a higher proportion of noradrenergic (NA) phenotype (P < 0.05), a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (P < 0.05), and sustained arterial hypertension (P < 0.01) and its duration (P < 0.05), as opposed to the other groups. All parameters of TOD were more pronounced only in reverse dippers compared with nondippers and dippers. The presence of NA phenotype (=absence of adrenaline production) was associated with reverse dipping and TOD (LVH and PWV). Conclusions Patients with reverse dipping had more substantial TOD compared with other groups. The NA phenotype plays an important role, not only in impaired diurnal BP variability but also independently from dipping status in more pronounced TOD of heart and vessels.

C atheter-based renal denervation (RDN) has been considered as a new hope for patients with resistant hypertension (RH). The first studies published by the same pioneering group of experts 1,2 triggered widespread enthusiasm, and the new method was quickly promulgated. However, this was slowed down in 2014 by publication of trials with negative results for RDN. [3][4][5][6] Apart from exceptions, 7 most of these studies failed to prove the satisfactory efficacy of RDN.3-6 Based on these results, the Czech Society for Hypertension does not recommend implementation of RDN in routine practice. 8This study seeks to evaluate the efficacy of RDN in a prospective multicenter randomized trial with the acronym PRAGUE-15 in patients with true RH. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, exclusion of secondary hypertension, and evaluation of treatment compliance served as confirmation of true resistance. The efficacy of RDN was compared with intensified antihypertensive treatment, including the use of spironolactone. The 6-month results of the PRAGUE-15 study were previously published. 6 To date, only 1 properly designed study has published 12-month results 9 where RDN was compared with a sham procedure. Here we present the 1-year data, including the evaluation of renal artery changes after RDN and hormonal and hemodynamic parameters. See Editorial Commentary, pp 278-280Abstract-This randomized, multicenter study compared the relative efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) versus pharmacotherapy alone in patients with true resistant hypertension and assessed the effect of spironolactone addition. We present here the 12-month data. A total of 106 patients with true resistant hypertension were enrolled in this study: 52 patients were randomized to RDN and 54 patients to the spironolactone addition, with baseline systolic blood pressure of 159±17 and 155±17 mm Hg and average number of drugs 5.1 and 5.4, respectively. Twelve-month results are available in 101 patients. The intention-to-treat analysis found a comparable mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure decline of 6.4 mm Hg, P=0.001 in RDN versus 8.2 mm Hg, P=0.002 in the pharmacotherapy group. Per-protocol analysis revealed a significant difference of 24-hour systolic blood pressure decline between complete RDN (6.3 mm Hg, P=0.004) and the subgroup where spironolactone was added, and this continued within the 12 months (15 mm Hg, P= 0.003). Renal artery computed tomography angiograms before and after 1 year post-RDN did not reveal any relevant changes. This study shows that over a period of 12 months, RDN is safe, with no serious side effects and no major changes in the renal arteries. RDN in the settings of true resistant hypertension with confirmed compliance is not superior to intensified pharmacological treatment. Spironolactone addition (if tolerated) seems to be more effective in blood pressure reduction.

Many of the patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) are denied curative adrenalectomy because of limited availability or failure of adrenal vein sampling. It has been suggested that adrenal vein sampling can be omitted in young patients with a unilateral adrenal nodule, who show a florid biochemical PA phenotype. As this suggestion was based on a very low quality of evidence, we tested the applicability and accuracy of imaging, performed by computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance, for identification of unilateral PA, as determined by biochemical and/or clinical cure after unilateral adrenalectomy. Among 1625 patients with PA submitted to adrenal vein sampling in a multicenter multiethnic international study, 473 were ≤45 years of age; 231 of them had exhaustive imaging and follow-up data. Fifty-three percentage had a unilateral adrenal nodule, 43% had no nodules, and 4% bilateral nodules. Fifty-six percentage (n=131) received adrenalectomy and 128 were unambiguously diagnosed as unilateral PA. A unilateral adrenal nodule on imaging and hypokalemia were the strongest predictors of unilateral PA at regression analysis. Accordingly, imaging allowed correct identification of the responsible adrenal in 95% of the adrenalectomized patients with a unilateral nodule. The rate raised to 100% in the patients with hypokalemia, who comprised 29% of the total, but fell to 88% in those without hypokalemia. Therefore, a unilateral nodule and hypokalemia could be used to identify unilateral PA in patients ≤45 years of age if adrenal vein sampling is not easily available. However, adrenal vein sampling remains indispensable in 71% of the young patients, who showed no nodules/bilateral nodules at imaging and/or no hypokalemia. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01234220.