No abstract

Aquatic biomonitoring has become an essential task in Europe and many other regions as a consequence of strong anthropogenic pressures affecting the health of lakes, rivers, oceans and groundwater. A typical assessment of the environmental quality status, such as it is required by European but also North American and other legislation, relies on matching the composition of assemblages of organisms identified using morphological criteria present in aquatic ecosystems to those expected in the absence of anthropogenic pressures. Through decade-long and difficult intercalibration exercises among networks of regulators and scientists in European countries, a pragmatic biomonitoring approach was developed and adopted, which now produces invaluable information. Nonetheless, this approach is based on several hundred different protocols, making Next-Generation Biomonitoring of Aquatic Ecosystems

The protection, preservation and restoration of aquatic ecosystems and their functions are of global importance. For European states it became legally binding mainly through the EU-Water Framework Directive (WFD). In order to assess the ecological status of a given water body, aquatic biodiversity data are obtained and compared to a reference water body. The quantified mismatch obtained determines the extent of potential management actions. The current approach to biodiversity assessment is based on morpho-taxonomy. This approach has many drawbacks such as being time consuming, limited in temporal and spatial resolution, and error-prone due to the varying individual taxonomic expertise of the analysts. Novel genomic tools can overcome many of the aforementioned problems and could complement or even replace traditional bioassessment. Yet, a plethora of approaches are independently developed in different institutions, thereby hampering any concerted routine application. The goal of this Action is to nucleate a group of researchers across disciplines with the task to identify gold-standard genomic tools and novel ecogenomic indices for routine application in biodiversity assessments of European fresh-and marine water bodies. Furthermore, DNAqua-Net will provide a platform for training of the next generation of European researchers preparing them for the new technologies. Jointly with water managers, politicians, and other stakeholders, the group will develop a

100Effective identification of species using short DNA fragments (DNA barcoding and DNA 101 metabarcoding) requires reliable sequence reference libraries of known taxa. Both 102 taxonomically comprehensive coverage and content quality are important for sufficient 103 accuracy. For aquatic ecosystems in Europe, reliable barcode reference libraries are 104 particularly important if molecular identification tools are to be implemented in biomonitoring 105 and reports in the context of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the Marine 106Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). We analysed gaps in the two most important 107 reference databases, Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD) and NCBI GenBank, with a 108 focus on the taxa most frequently used in WFD and MSFD. Our analyses show that 109 coverage varies strongly among taxonomic groups, and among geographic regions. In 110 general, groups that were actively targeted in barcode projects (e.g. fish, true bugs, 111 caddisflies and vascular plants) are well represented in the barcode libraries, while others 112 have fewer records (e.g. marine molluscs, ascidians, and freshwater diatoms). We also 113 found that species monitored in several countries often are represented by barcodes in 114 reference libraries, while species monitored in a single country frequently lack sequence 115 records. A large proportion of species (up to 50%) in several taxonomic groups are only 116represented by private data in BOLD. Our results have implications for the future strategy to 117 fill existing gaps in barcode libraries, especially if DNA metabarcoding is to be used in the 118 monitoring of European aquatic biota under the WFD and MSFD. For example, missing 119 species relevant to monitoring in multiple countries should be prioritized. We also discuss 120 why a strategy for quality control and quality assurance of barcode reference libraries is 121 needed and recommend future steps to ensure full utilization of metabarcoding in aquatic 122 biomonitoring. 123 124

SUMMARY1. Molecular genetic techniques have been used in freshwater biology for more than 30 years. Early work focussed on studies of population structure, systematics and taxonomy. More recently, the range of studies has broadened to include ecology and adaptation. Advances in analytical methods and in technology (e.g. next-generation sequencing) and decreasing costs of data production ensure that the field will continue to develop and broaden in scope. 2. At least three factors make the application of molecular techniques to freshwater biology exciting. First, the highly variable nature of many aquatic habitats makes them excellent models for the study of environmental change on ecological and evolutionary time scales. Second, the mature state of the field of freshwater biology provides an extensive foundation of ecological knowledge of freshwater organisms and their distinct adaptations. Third, the methodological advances allow researchers to focus more on merging molecular and ecological research and less on designing studies around technical limitations. 3. We identified eight research areas in freshwater biology in which the integration of molecular and ecological approaches provides exceptional opportunities. The list is not exhaustive, but considers a broad range of topics and spans the continuum from basic to applied research. The areas identified use a combination of natural, experimental and in silico approaches. 4. With advancing molecular techniques, freshwater biology is in an unusually strong position to link the genetic basis and ecological importance of adaptations across a wide range of taxa, ecosystems and spatiotemporal scales. Our aim was to identify opportunities for the integration of molecular and ecological approaches, to motivate greater collaboration and crossover, and to promote exploitation of the synergies of bridging ecological and evolutionary freshwater research.