Background: Malnutrition dramatically increases the risk of postoperative complications and delays patient recovery. Therefore, a feeding jejunostomy tube (FJT) is routinely placed during esophagectomy to maintain the postoperative nutrition supply. However, recently published studies have questioned the need of a FJT in every esophageal cancer patient. Because most patients can resume oral intake shortly after surgery, the nutrition-providing function of a FJT becomes much less critical. In contrast, FJT-related complications could be severe.Methods: Relevant publications were found out by systemic searching of four medical databases (Pubmed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials). By reading the titles and the abstracts, potentially relevant studies were screened from the search results. The incidence of postoperative complications and FJT-related complications were calculated and compared to evaluate the efficacy of a FJT.Results: Eighteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The no-FJT group had a similar or even lower incidence of postoperative complications [anastomotic leakage (AL), pulmonary complications, and wound infections] compared with the FJT group. Ileus and FJT site infections were the most common FJTrelated complications. The incidence of ileus was approximately 6% (95% CI: 3-12%), and over 63% of the patients with an ileus required re-operation to relieve the obstruction. The pooled mean rate of FJT site infections was 7% (95% CI: 6-9%). Approximately 7% of patients had dysfunction (obstruction or dislocation) of the jejunostomy tube (95% CI: 3-14%). Conclusions:The non-selective placement of a FJT during esophagectomy provides few benefits to the patients and may even increase the risk of postoperative complications. Therefore, an intraoperative FJT should be selectively prescribed, but not routinely in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.

Besides shorter distance to visceral pleura and pleural indentation, elderly, adenocarcinoma, and poor tumor differentiation were novel biologic factors correlated to VPI in early-stage NSCLC, which may explain why VPI was an unfavorable prognostic factor for early-stage NSCLC.

OBJECTIVES Nodal skip metastasis (NSM) is a common phenomenon in mid-thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (MT-OSCC); however, the prognostic implications of NSM in patients with MT-OSCC remain unclear. METHODS This retrospective study enrolled 300 patients with MT-OSCC who underwent radical oesophagectomy and who had pathologically confirmed lymph node metastasis from January 2014 to December 2016. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of NSM. Propensity score matching was applied to minimize patient selection bias. The impact of NSM on overall survival (OS) was assessed by Kaplan–Meier and multiple Cox proportional hazards analyses. The median follow-up time was 57 months. RESULTS The NSM rate in the entire cohort was 22.0% (66/300). Pathological N (pN) stage (P < 0.001) and sex (P = 0.001) were identified as significant independent risk factors for NSM. NSM was more frequent in pN1 compared with pN2 patients (87.9% vs 12.1%, P < 0.001) and no NSM was found in pN3. NSM(+) patients had better prognoses than NSM(−) patients (Kaplan–Meier; 3-year OS, 62.1% vs 34.1%, P < 0.001). Propensity score matching produced 51 matched pairs, and the 3-year OS was still better in the NSM(+) compared with the NSM(−) group (66.7% vs 40.0%, P = 0.025). Multivariable Cox analysis confirmed NSM(+) as an independent factor favouring OS in patients with MT-OSCC. CONCLUSIONS NSM usually occurs at pN1 stage in patients with MT-OSCC, and is associated with a favourable prognosis.

Contributions: (I) Conception and design: YD Lin; (II) Administrative support: YD Lin; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: YD Lin;

No abstract