No abstract

Human enteroviruses (EV) belong to the Picornaviridae family and are among the most common viruses infecting humans. They consist of up to 100 immunologically and genetically distinct types: polioviruses, coxsackieviruses A and B, echoviruses, and the more recently characterized 43 EV types. Frequent recombinations and mutations in enteroviruses have been recognized as the main mechanisms for the observed high rate of evolution, thus enabling them to rapidly respond and adapt to new environmental challenges. The first signs of genetic exchanges between enteroviruses came from polioviruses many years ago, and since then recombination has been recognized, along with mutations, as the main cause for reversion of vaccine strains to neurovirulence. More recently, non-polio enteroviruses became the focus of many studies, where recombination was recognized as a frequent event and was correlated with the appearance of new enterovirus lineages and types. The accumulation of multiple inter- and intra-typic recombination events could also explain the series of successive emergences and disappearances of specific enterovirus types that could in turn explain the epidemic profile of circulation of several types. This review focuses on recombination among human non-polio enteroviruses from all four species (EV-A, EV-B, EV-C, and EV-D) and discusses the recombination effects on enterovirus epidemiology and evolution.

No abstract

Integration of HPV16 DNA into the host chromosome usually disrupts the E1 and/or E2 genes. The present study investigated the disruption of E1, E2 genes in a total of eighty four HPV16-positive precancerous and cervical cancer specimens derived from Greek women (seventeen paraffin-embedded cervical biopsies and sixty seven Thin Prep samples). Complete E2 and E1 genes were amplified using three and nine overlapping primer sets respectively, in order to define the sites of disruption. Extensive mapping analysis revealed that disruption/deletion events within E2 gene occurred in high grade and cervical cancer samples (x(2) test, P < 0.01), while no evidence of E2 gene disruption was documented among low grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasias. In addition, disruptions within the E1 gene occur both in high and low grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. This leads to the assumption that in low grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasias only E1 gene disruption was involved (Fisher's exact test, P < 0.05), while in high grade malignancies and cervical cancer cases deletions in both E1 and E2 genes occurred. Furthermore, the most prevalent site of disruption of E1 gene was located between nucleotides 1059 and 1323, while the most prevalent deleted region of the E2 gene was located between nucleotides 3172 and 3649 (E2 hinge region). Therefore, it is proposed that each population has its own profile of frequencies and sites of disruptions and extensive mapping analysis of E1 and E2 genes is mandatory in order to determine suitable markers for HPV16 DNA integration analysis in distinct populations.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 genome integration into the host chromosome is a crucial event during the life cycle of the virus and a major step towards carcinogenesis. The integration of HPV16 DNA promotes a constitutive high expression level of E6 and E7 oncoproteins, resulting in the extensive proliferation of the infected epithelial cells. In the present report the physical status of the HPV16 genome was studied, through determination of E1/E6 and E2/E6 DNA copy number ratios in 61 cervical samples of low-and high-grade malignancy and 8 cervical cancer samples, all of them associated with HPV16 infection. The selection of E1, E2 and E6 amplification target regions was performed according to the most prevalent deleted/disrupted sites of E1 and E2 genes. For this target selection we also considered the most conserved regions of E1, E2 and E6 genes among the same HPV16 isolates that were recently reported by our group. The analysis of HPV16 DNA form revealed a significant association among the mixed DNA forms in low-grade and high-grade malignancies, (x 2 , P,0.01). The comparative analysis of E1/E6 and E2/E6 in the same cervical samples provides an accurate picture of HPV16 DNA form and may reveal whether different HPV16 DNA integrants coexist in the same cervical sample or not. This study proposes that E1/E6 and E2/E6 ratios determine with accuracy the HPV16 DNA integration pattern and may predict multiple integration events in the examined sample, thus providing significant information about the progression of cervical dysplasia. INTRODUCTIONCervical cancer is the third most common type of cancer among women worldwide, with a high mortality rate. The worldwide incidence of cervical carcinoma is more than 530 000 cases per year, whereas mortality reaches 275 000 deaths annually, of which approximately 85 % occur in developing countries (Jemal et al., 2011;Forman et al., 2012). The aetiological agents for the development of highgrade precancerous cervical lesions and invasive cervical cancer are the oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) types present as persistent infections (Muñoz et al., 2003).To date, more than 150 different HPV types have been characterized and about 40 of them are related with anogenital tract malignancy, grouped as high-risk (HR) or low-risk (LR) genotypes (zur Hausen, 1996;Bernard et al., 2006 Bernard et al., , 2010. Epidemiological studies revealed that HPV16 is the most commonly observed HR HPV type, followed by HPV18, 31, 33 and 45 (de Sanjose et al., 2010;Li et al., 2011).Persistent infection with HR HPV types is associated with an increasing risk of integration of the viral circular genome (episome) into the host chromosomes, leading to cancer development. The circular HPV genome is then linearized, but the long control region, and the E6 and E7 oncogenes, are always retained intact (Wentzensen et al., 2004; Xu et al., 2013;Akagi et al., 2014). Viral integration appears to coincide with the development of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN II, III) as a consequence...