To identify factors that regulate gut microbiota density and the impact of varied microbiota density on health, we assayed this fundamental ecosystem property in fecal samples across mammals, human disease, and therapeutic interventions. Physiologic features of the host (carrying capacity) and the fitness of the gut microbiota shape microbiota density. Therapeutic manipulation of microbiota density in mice altered host metabolic and immune homeostasis. In humans, gut microbiota density was reduced in Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The gut microbiota in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection had lower density and reduced fitness that were restored by fecal microbiota transplantation. Understanding the interplay between microbiota and disease in terms of microbiota density, host carrying capacity, and microbiota fitness provide new insights into microbiome structure and microbiome targeted therapeutics.Editorial note: This article has been through an editorial process in which the authors decide how to respond to the issues raised during peer review. The Reviewing Editor's assessment is that all the issues have been addressed (see decision letter).
Clostridioides difficile infection is a leading cause of healthcare-associated infections with significant morbidity and mortality. For the past decade, the bulk of infection prevention and epidemiologic surveillance efforts have been directed toward mitigating hospital-acquired C. difficile. However, the incidence of community-associated infection is on the rise. Patients with community-associated C. difficile tend to be younger and have lower mortality rate. Rates of recurrent C. difficile infection overall have decreased in the United States, but future research and public health endeavors are needed to standardize and improve disease detection, stratify risk factors in large-scale population studies, and to identify regional and local variations in strain types, reservoirs and transmission routes to help characterize and combat the changing epidemiology of C. difficile.
To the Editor-Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the most common healthcare-associated infection in the United States. 1 CDI affects 13 in every 1,000 patients, and~75% of cases are classified as hospital onset. Antimicrobial stewardship and compliance with hand hygiene and personal protective equipment (PPE) protocols are paramount in efforts to reduce horizontal CDI transmission. 2 As an epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), New York City hospitals saw a dramatic increase in admissions and ICU utilization. 3 To understand the impact of COVID-19 on hospital-onset CDI, we examined antibiotic prescribing patterns, standardized infection ratios (SIRs), and baseline variables in hospitalized adult patients prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that increased antibiotics exposure during the COVID-19 pandemic would lead to a higher incidence of CDI in hospitalized patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis at a high-volume tertiary-care center comparing a pre-COVID-19 cohort (February-June 2019) of all adult patients who were diagnosed with CDI on admission or during their hospitalization with a cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic (February-June 2020). Baseline categorical variables were compared using χ 2 tests and continuous variables were compared using the Student t test and Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. All analysis was performed in SAS version 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Primary outcomes of interest included rates of hospital-onset CDI (HO-CDI, defined as a positive C. difficile test over 3 days after admission), 4 antibiotic prescribing and length of stay. HO-CDI incidence was described by the standardized infection ratios (SIR), which adjusts for facility and patient-level factors that contribute to hospitalonset infection risk within each facility. Antibiotic prescriptions were measured by antibiotic days per 1,000 days present. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Overall, HO-CDI SIR 5 was not statistically different during the COVID-19 period than during the 2019 period (P = 0.69)
Background: Recurrent and severe Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) are treated with fecal microbiota transplant (FMT). Uncertainty exists regarding FMT effectiveness for CDI with underlying inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and regarding its effects on disease activity and effectiveness in transferring the donor microbiota to patients with and without IBD.Methods: Subjects with and without IBD who underwent FMT for recurrent or severe CDI between 2013 and 2016 at The Mount Sinai Hospital were followed for up to 6 months. The primary outcome was CDI recurrence 6 months after FMT. Secondary outcomes were (1) CDI recurrence 2 months after FMT; (2) frequency of IBD flare after FMT; (3) microbiota engraftment after FMT; (and 4) predictors of CDI recurrence.Results: One hundred thirty-four patients, 46 with IBD, were treated with FMT. Follow-up was available in 83 and 118 patients at 6 and 2 months, respectively. There was no difference in recurrence in patients with and without IBD at 6 months (38.7% vs 36.5%; P > 0.99) and 2 months (22.5% vs 17.9%; P = 0.63). Proton pump inhibitor use, severe CDI, and comorbid conditions were predictors of recurrence. Pre-FMT microbiota was not predictive of CDI recurrence. Subjects with active disease requiring medication escalation had reduced engraftment, with no difference in engraftment based on CDI recurrence or IBD endoscopic severity at FMT. Conclusions:Inflammatory bowel disease did not affect CDI recurrence rates 6 months after FMT. Pre-FMT microbiota was not predictive of recurrence, and microbial engraftment was impacted in those requiring IBD treatment escalation, though not by CDI recurrence or IBD disease severity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.