Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588 (CBM 588) is a probiotic bacterium that has previously been used to prevent antibiotic-associated diarrhea. However, the underlying mechanism by which CBM 588 protects the gut epithelial barrier remains unclear. Here, we show that CBM 588 increased the abundance of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Lactococcus species in the gut microbiome and also enhanced the intestinal barrier function of mice with antibiotic-induced dysbiosis. Additionally, CBM 588 significantly promoted the expansion of IL-17A-producing gdT cells and IL-17A-producing CD4 cells in the colonic lamina propria (cLP), which was closely associated with changes in the intestinal microbial composition. Additionally, CBM 588 plays an important role in controlling antibiotic-induced gut inflammation through upregulation of anti-inflammatory lipid metabolites such as palmitoleic acid, 15d-prostaglandin J 2 , and protectin D 1 . This study reveals a previously unrecognized mechanism of CBM 588 and provides new insights into gut epithelial barrier protection with probiotics under conditions of antibiotic-induced dysbiosis.

Considering the issues of shortage of medical resources and the invasiveness and infection risk involved in the collection of nasopharyngeal swab specimens, there is a need for an effective alternative test specimen for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection. Here, we investigated suitability of saliva as a non-invasively obtained specimen for molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Japanese patients with COVID-19. In total, 28 paired clinical specimens of saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 12 patients at various time points after symptom onset. Each specimen was assayed using reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) on the BD MAX open system using primers and probes targeting the N-gene. The saliva and nasopharyngeal swab specimens showed 19 and 15 positive results, respectively. No invalid (PCR inhibition) result was observed for any specimen. The qualitative results of each specimen obtained in the period immediately after symptom onset were similar. Three convalescent patients presented saliva-positive results, whereas their nasopharyngeal swabs were negative at four different time points, suggesting that saliva may be superior to nasopharyngeal swabs in terms of obtaining stable assay result of SARS-CoV-2. In conclusion, our results suggest that saliva can potentially serve as an alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs as a specimen for SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR. As saliva can be collected by patients themselves, it may be an effective way to overcome the shortage of personal protective equipment and specimen sampling tools.

Background: The Japanese Respiratory Society recently updated its prognostic guidelines for pneumonia, recommending that pneumonia severity be evaluated using the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and quick SOFA (qSOFA) scoring systems in a therapeutic strategy flowchart. However, the efficacy and accuracy of these tools are still unknown. Methods: All patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) who were admitted to the study institution between 2014 and 2017 were enrolled in this study. Pneumonia severity on admission was evaluated by A-DROP, CURB-65, PSI, I-ROAD, qSOFA, and SOFA scoring systems. Prognostic factors for 30-day mortality were also analyzed. Results: This study included 406 patients, 257 male (63%) and 149 female (37%). The median age was 79 years (range 19-103 years). The 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates were both 5%. With respect to the diagnostic value of the predictive assessments for 30-day mortality, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) value for the SOFA score was 0.769 for CAP patients and 0.774 for HCAP patients. Further, the AUROC values for the SOFA score in CAP and HCAP patients with a qSOFA score !2 were 0.829 and 0.784, respectively, for 30-day mortality. Conclusions: qSOFA and SOFA scores were able to correctly evaluate the severity of CAP and HCAP.

No abstract

Amikacin has been one of the important antimicrobial agents against Gram-negative pathogens. However, there is discrepancy regarding the amikacin initial dosage, with some reports recently recommending ≥25 mg/kg and others the conventional dosage (15–20 mg/kg). Hence, we evaluated the optimal initial dosing regimen of amikacin. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were estimated using a population PK analysis. The pharmacodynamic (PD) target was a ratio of ≥8 between the concentration achieved 1 h after beginning the infusion (C peak) and the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the liable bacteria. Based on the population PK parameters, we simulated individual C peak for several dosing regimens by Monte Carlo method and analyzed the C peak/MIC ratio for MICs from 0.5 to 32 μg/mL. This study included 35 infected patients (25 males), with a median (range) age and body weight of 70 (15–95) years and 49.5 (32.5–78) kg, respectively. A two-compartment model was used, and total body clearance (CL) significantly correlated with creatinine clearance, and volume of distribution (V d) with body weight. Regarding the probability to achieve a C peak/MIC of ≥8, the 15 mg/kg regimen was sufficient to achieve the PK/PD target in ≥90% of patients for a MIC of 4 μg/mL or less. The cumulative fraction of response in Pseudomonas aeruginosa was that 76% of patients achieved a C peak/MIC of 8 with the amikacin dosage of 15 mg/kg/day. We suggest that the 15-mg/kg once-daily dosage of amikacin be recommended as the initial dosage. As its maintenance dosage, the 15 mg/kg/day amikacin dosage is needed for a MIC of ≤4 μg/mL, and amikacin monotherapy for a MIC of ≥8 μg/mL should be avoided.