Zr-monosubstituted Lindqvist-type polyoxometalates (Zr-POMs), (Bu 4 N) 2 [W 5 O 18 Zr(H 2 O) 3 ] (1) and (Bu 4 N) 6 [{W 5 O 18 Zr(μ-OH)} 2 ] (2), have been employed as molecular models to unravel the mechanism of hydrogen peroxide activation over Zr(IV) sites. Compounds 1 and 2 are hydrolytically stable and catalyze the epoxidation of CC bonds in unfunctionalized alkenes and α,β-unsaturated ketones, as well as sulfoxidation of thioethers. Monomer 1 is more active than dimer 2. Acid additives greatly accelerate the oxygenation reactions and increase oxidant utilization efficiency up to >99%. Product distributions are indicative of a heterolytic oxygen transfer mechanism that involves electrophilic oxidizing species formed upon the interaction of Zr-POM and H 2 O 2 . The interaction of 1 and 2 with H 2 O 2 and the resulting peroxo derivatives have been investigated by UV−vis, FTIR, Raman spectroscopy, HR-ESI-MS, and combined HPLC-ICPatomic emission spectroscopy techniques. The interaction between an 17 O-enriched dimer, (Bu 4 N) 6 [{W 5 O 18 Zr(μ-OCH 3 )} 2 ] (2′), and H 2 O 2 was also analyzed by 17 O NMR spectroscopy. Combining these experimental studies with DFT calculations suggested the existence of dimeric peroxo species [(μ-η 2 :η 2 -O 2 ){ZrW 5 O 18 } 2 ] 6− as well as monomeric Zr-hydroperoxo [W 5 O 18 Zr(η 2 -OOH)] 3− and Zr-peroxo [HW 5 O 18 Zr(η 2 - O 2 )] 3− species. Reactivity studies revealed that the dimeric peroxo is inert toward alkenes but is able to transfer oxygen atoms to thioethers, while the monomeric peroxo intermediate is capable of epoxidizing CC bonds. DFT analysis of the reaction mechanism identifies the monomeric Zr-hydroperoxo intermediate as the real epoxidizing species and the corresponding α-oxygen transfer to the substrate as the rate-determining step. The calculations also showed that protonation of Zr-POM significantly reduces the free-energy barrier of the key oxygen-transfer step because of the greater electrophilicity of the catalyst and that dimeric species hampers the approach of alkene substrates due to steric repulsions reducing its reactivity. The improved performance of the Zr(IV) catalyst relative to Ti(IV) and Nb(V) catalysts is respectively due to a flexible coordination environment and a low tendency to form energy deep-well and low-reactive Zr-peroxo intermediates.

Nb-monosubstituted Lindqvist-type polyoxometalates (POM), (Bu4N)4[(NbW5O18)2O] (1) and (Bu4N)3[Nb­(O)­W5O18] (2), catalyze epoxidation of alkenes with hydrogen peroxide and mimic the catalytic performance of heterogeneous Nb-silicate catalysts. Dimer 1 is more active than monomer 2, but the catalytic activity of the latter increases in the presence of acid. Kinetic and spectroscopic studies suggest a mechanism that involves generation of monomer (Bu4N)2[Nb­(OH)­W5O18] (3), interaction of 3 with H2O2 leading to a protonated peroxo niobium species, (Bu4N)2[HNb­(O2)­W5O18] (4), followed by oxygen transfer to a CC bond in alkene. The previously unknown peroxo complex 4 has been isolated and characterized by elemental analysis; UV–vis, FT-IR, Raman, 93Nb, 17O and 183W NMR spectroscopy; cyclic voltammetry; and potentiometric titration. The physicochemical techniques support a monomeric Lindqvist structure of 4 bearing one peroxo ligand attached to Nb­(V) in a η2-coordination mode. While the unprotonated peroxo complex (Bu4N)3[Nb­(O2)­W5O18] (5) is inert toward alkenes under stoichiometric conditions, 4 readily reacts with cyclohexene to afford epoxide and 1,2-trans-cyclohexane diol, which proves the key role of protons for heterolytic activation of H2O2 over Nb­(V). The IR, Raman, UV–vis, and 17O NMR spectroscopic studies along with DFT calculations showed that the activating proton in 4 is predominantly located at a Nb–O–W bridging oxygen. However, DFT calculations revealed that the protonated peroxo species “HNb­(O2)” is present in equilibrium with a hydroperoxo species “Nb­(η2-OOH),” which has a lower activation barrier for the oxygen transfer to cyclohexene and is, therefore, the main epoxidizing species. The calculations indicate that protonation is crucial to generating the active species and to increasing POM electrophilicity.

Zr-based metal–organic frameworks (Zr-MOF) UiO-66 and UiO-67 catalyze thioether oxidation in nonprotic solvents with unprecedentedly high selectivity toward corresponding sulfones (96–99% at ca. 50% sulfide conversion with only 1 equiv of H2O2). The reaction mechanism has been investigated using test substrates, kinetic, adsorption, isotopic (18O) labeling, and spectroscopic tools. The following facts point out a nucleophilic character of the peroxo species responsible for the superior formation of sulfones: (1) nucleophilic parameter XNu = 0.92 in the oxidation of thianthrene 5-oxide and its decrease upon addition of acid; (2) sulfone to sulfoxide ratio of 24 in the competitive oxidation of methyl phenyl sulfoxide and p-Br-methyl phenyl sulfide; (3) significantly lower initial rates of methyl phenyl sulfide oxidation relative to methyl phenyl sulfoxide (k S/k SO = 0.05); and (4) positive slope ρ = +0.42 of the Hammett plot for competitive oxidation of p-substituted aryl methyl sulfoxides. Nucleophilic activation of H2O2 on Zr-MOF is also manifested by their capability of catalyzing epoxidation of electron-deficient CC bonds in α,β-unsaturated ketones accompanied by oxidation of acetonitrile solvent. Kinetic modeling on methyl phenyl sulfoxide oxidation coupled with adsorption studies supports a mechanism that involves the interaction of H2O2 with Zr sites with the formation of a nucleophilic oxidizing species and release of water followed by oxygen atom transfer from the nucleophilic oxidant to sulfoxide that competes with water for Zr sites. The nucleophilic peroxo species coexists with an electrophilic one, ZrOOH, capable of oxygen atom transfer to nucleophilic sulfides. The predominance of nucleophilic activation of H2O2 over electrophilic one is, most likely, ensured by the presence of weak basic sites in Zr-MOFs identified by FTIR spectroscopy of adsorbed CDCl3 and quantified by adsorption of isobutyric acid.

Properties of matrices manufactured by electrospinning from solutions of polyurethane Tecoflex EG-80A with gelatin in 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoroisopropanol were studied. The concentration of gelatin added to the electrospinning solution was shown to influence the mechanical properties of matrices: the dependence of matrix tensile strength on protein concentration is described by a bell-shaped curve and an increase in gelatin concentration added to the elasticity of the samples. SEM, FTIR spectroscopy, and mechanical testing demonstrate that incubation of matrices in phosphate buffer changes the structure of the fibers and alters the polyurethane-gelatin interactions, increasing matrix durability. The ability of the matrices to maintain adhesion and proliferation of human endothelial cells was studied. The results suggest that matrices made of 3% polyurethane solution with 15% gelatin (wt/wt) and treated with glutaraldehyde are the optimal variant for cultivation of endothelial cells.