Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan (VPZ) versus proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in clarithromycin-based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (C-BQT) for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. Methods: Medical records of patients in whom H. pylori was eradicated between 1 July 2018 and 31 December 2021 were retrieved retrospectively from the Outpatient Unit of Qilu Hospital. Efficacy, safety, and compliance were compared between VPZ-based and PPI-based C-BQT, containing vonoprazan 20 mg or proton pump inhibitors (lansoprazole 30 mg or esomeprazole 20 mg), bismuth 220 or 200 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, and clarithromycin 500 mg, twice daily for 2 weeks by 1:1 propensity score matching analysis. The trial was registed on ClinicalTrials.gov (registration no. NCT05301725).Results: The H. pylori eradication rates of VPZ-based and PPI-based therapies were 88.8% (151/170) and 87.6% (149/170) in the intention-to-treat analysis, 94.1% (144/153) and 91.1% (144/158) in the per-protocol analysis, respectively. The noninferiority of VPZ to PPI was confirmed in all analyses (P < 0.001). The incidence of adverse events was 30.0% (51/170) and 27.1% (46/170) in the VPZ-based and PPIbased groups, respectively. VPZ-based and PPI-based therapies were well tolerated and showed good patient compliance without significant differences.Conclusions: VPZ-based therapy resulted in a satisfactory eradication rate and was well tolerated for H. pylori eradication, which are comparable to PPIs in C-BQT as a first-line treatment for H. pylori infection.

No abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate if the WeChat-based patient-doctor interaction could affect treatment outcomes of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication compared with conventional patient education (CPE) alone.Methods: Patients treated for H. pylori infection for the first time at our clinic from 1 July 2019 to 31 July 2021 were retrospectively included and divided into the CPE and WeChat groups. Both groups received CPE including verbal education and a specifically designed printout with detailed instructions. Those in the WeChat group were required to join a physician-managed WeChat group chat and they were encouraged to ask questions for clarification. Baseline characteristics were matched using propensity score matching between the two groups. Relevant knowledge and instructions were occasionally shared.Eradication rate, compliance, and adverse events in the two groups were evaluated.Results: A total of 348 patients were included after propensity score matching. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed eradication rate of 85.6% in the WeChat group and 80.5% in the CPE group (P = 0.199), whereas the per-protocol eradication rate was 91.1% and 88.2% (P = 0.399), respectively. Compliance did not differ between the two groups (WeChat group vs CPE group: 92.5% vs 91.4%, P = 0.693). The incidences of adverse events were also comparable between the two groups.Conclusions: CPE utilization already yields fair H. pylori eradication rate; however, the WeChat-based patient-doctor interaction did not yield better results. More appropriate managements are needed in the future to explore the impact of the WeChat platform on H. pylori eradication.