BackgroundWe analyze the scientific basis and methodology used by the German MAK Commission in their recommendations for exposure limits and carcinogen classification of “granular biopersistent particles without known specific toxicity” (GBS). These recommendations are under review at the European Union level. We examine the scientific assumptions in an attempt to reproduce the results. MAK’s human equivalent concentrations (HECs) are based on a particle mass and on a volumetric model in which results from rat inhalation studies are translated to derive occupational exposure limits (OELs) and a carcinogen classification.MethodsWe followed the methods as proposed by the MAK Commission and Pauluhn 2011. We also examined key assumptions in the metrics, such as surface area of the human lung, deposition fractions of inhaled dusts, human clearance rates; and risk of lung cancer among workers, presumed to have some potential for lung overload, the physiological condition in rats associated with an increase in lung cancer risk.ResultsThe MAK recommendations on exposure limits for GBS have numerous incorrect assumptions that adversely affect the final results. The procedures to derive the respirable occupational exposure limit (OEL) could not be reproduced, a finding raising considerable scientific uncertainty about the reliability of the recommendations. Moreover, the scientific basis of using the rat model is confounded by the fact that rats and humans show different cellular responses to inhaled particles as demonstrated by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) studies in both species.ConclusionClassifying all GBS as carcinogenic to humans based on rat inhalation studies in which lung overload leads to chronic inflammation and cancer is inappropriate. Studies of workers, who have been exposed to relevant levels of dust, have not indicated an increase in lung cancer risk. Using the methods proposed by the MAK, we were unable to reproduce the OEL for GBS recommended by the Commission, but identified substantial errors in the models. Considerable shortcomings in the use of lung surface area, clearance rates, deposition fractions; as well as using the mass and volumetric metrics as opposed to the particle surface area metric limit the scientific reliability of the proposed GBS OEL and carcinogen classification.

No abstract

Carbon black is produced industrially by the partial combustion or thermal decomposition of gaseous or liquid hydrocarbons under controlled conditions. It is considered a poorly soluble, low toxicity (PSLT) particle. Recently, results from a number of published studies have suggested that carbon black may be directly genotoxic, and that it may also cause reproductive toxicity. Here, we review the evidence from these studies to determine whether carbon black is likely to act as a primary genotoxicant or reproductive toxicant in humans. For the genotoxicity endpoint, the available evidence clearly shows that carbon black does not directly interact with DNA. However, the study results are consistent with the mechanism that, at high enough concentrations, carbon black causes inflammation and oxidative stress in the lung leading to mutations, which is a secondary genotoxic mechanism. For the reproductive toxicity endpoint for carbon black, to date, there are various lung instillation studies and one short-term inhalation study that evaluated a selected number of reproduction endpoints (e.g. gestational and litter parameters) as well as other general endpoints (e.g. gene expression, neurofunction, DNA damage); usually at one time point or using a single dose. It is possible that some of the adverse effects observed in these studies may be the result of non-specific inflammatory effects caused by high exposure doses. An oral gavage study reported no adverse reproductive or developmental effects at the highest dose tested. The overall weight of evidence indicates that carbon black should not be considered a direct genotoxicant or reproductive toxicant.

Background The toxicokinetic behaviour of nanostructured particles following pulmonary or oral deposition is of great scientific interest. In this toxicokinetic study, following the general principles of OECD TG 417, the systemic availability of carbon black, a nanostructured material consisting of agglomerated aggregates was characterised. Methods Each of two grades of beryllium-7 labelled carbon black (Monarch® 1000, oxidized and Printex® 90; untreated) was administered either intratracheally or orally to adult rats. Independent of route, rats received a single dose of approximately 0.3 mg radiolabelled carbon black. A total of 12 rats were treated per grade and per exposure route: 4 females each for feces/urine/organs and serial blood kinetics; 4 males for organs. At necropsy, the complete suite of organs was analysed for females, but only the lungs, liver, kidney, reproductive organs for males. Results In the pulmonarily exposed animals, 7Be-Monarch® 1000 and 7Be-Printex® 90 was detected in feces in the first 3 days after treatment at significant levels, i.e. 17.6% and 8.2%, respectively. In urine, small percentages of 6.7% and 0.4% were observed, respectively. In blood, radioactivity, representative of carbon black was within the background noise of the measurement method. At necropsy, 20 days post-instillation, both test items were practically exclusively found in lungs (75.1% and 91.0%, respectively) and in very small amounts (approximately 0.5%) in the lung-associated lymph nodes (LALN). In the other organs/tissues the test item was not detectable. BAL analyses indicated that carbon black particles were completely engulfed by alveolar macrophages. In orally exposed animals, 98% (7Be-Monarch® 1000) and 99% (7Be-Printex® 90) of the measured radioactivity was detected in feces. Excretion was complete within the first 3 days following treatment. 1.3% and 0.5% of measured activity was attributable to urine in animals that received 7Be-Monarch® 1000 and 7Be-Printex® 90, respectively. Radioactivity was absent in blood and other organs and tissues. Conclusion Radioactivity, representative of carbon black, was not detected beyond the experimentally defined limit of quantitation systemically after deposition in lungs or stomach in rats. Under these experimental conditions, the two CB samples were not shown to translocate beyond the lung or the GI tract into the blood compartment.

No abstract