Objectives:The aim of the present study was to explore the effects of three different types of alpha-1 adrenoceptor blockers (a1-blocker) on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), erectile dysfunction (ED) and ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods: A total of 136 male LUTS patients aged 50-80 years with International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Ն8 were enrolled. They were divided into three groups. Group S received silodosin at 4 mg twice a day; group T received tamsulosin at 0.2 mg once a day; and group N received naftopidil at 50 mg once a day. Assessment included IPSS, quality of life indexes (QOL), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), an ejaculation questionnaire, Qmax and post-void residual urine volume (PVR). These parameters were recorded at baseline, and at 1 and 3 months after treatment had ended. Results: Mean IPSS and Qmax significantly improved after treatment in all groups without any significant difference among them. As for the IIEF-5 score, only group N significantly improved at 1 and 3 months. After treatment, 2.6 and 2.4% of patients complained of a de novo reduced volume of ejaculation in both groups T and N, respectively. Ten out of 41 patients (24.4%) complained of a total absence of antegrade ejaculation in group S after treatment. Conclusions: All three types of a1-blockers provided an objective and subjective improvement of LUTS in the present study population. However, erectile function only improved in patients treated with naftopidil and a higher rate of EjD was observed in those receiving silodosin. Because of their variable effects, we should consider the sexual dimension when prescribing a1-blockers for LUTS.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Biparametric MRI (bpMRI) without dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) results in an elimination of adverse events, shortened examination time, and reduced costs, compared to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). The ability of bpMRI to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) with the Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) compared to standard mpMRI has not been studied extensively. Purpose: To compare the interobserver reliability and diagnostic performance for detecting csPC of bpMRI and mpMRI using PI-RADS v2.1. Study Type: Retrospective. Population: In all, 103 patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels who underwent mpMRI and subsequent MRI-ultrasonography fusion-guided prostate-targeted biopsy (MRGB) with or without prostatectomy. Field Strength/Sequences: T 2-weighted imaging (T 2 WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and DCE-MRI at 3T. Assessment: Three readers independently assessed each suspected PC lesion, assigning a score of 1-5 for T 2 WI, a score of 1-5 for DWI, and positive and negative for DCE-MRI according to PI-RADS v2.1 and determined the overall PI-RADS assessment category of bpMRI (T 2 WI and DWI) and mpMRI (T 2 WI, DWI, and DCE-MRI). The reference standard was MRGB or prostatectomy-derived histopathology. Statistical Testing: Statistical analysis was performed using the kappa statistic and McNemar and Delong tests. Results: Of the 165 suspected PC lesions in 103 patients, 81 were diagnosed with csPC and 84 with benign conditions. Interobserver variability of PI-RADS assessment category showed good agreement for bpMRI (kappa value = 0.642) and mpMRI (kappa value = 0.644). For three readers, the diagnostic sensitivity was significantly higher for mpMRI than for bpMRI (P < 0.001 to P = 0.016, respectively), whereas diagnostic specificity was significantly higher for bpMRI than for mpMRI (P < 0.001 each). For three readers, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was higher for bpMRI than for mpMRI; however, the difference was significant only for Reader 1 and Reader 3 (Reader 1: 0.823 vs. 0.785, P = 0.035; Reader 2: 0.852 vs. 0.829, P = 0.099; and Reader 3: 0.828 vs. 0.773, P = 0.002). Data Conclusion: For detecting csPC using PI-RADS v2.1, the interobserver reliability and diagnostic performance of bpMRI was comparable with those of mpMRI. Level of Evidence: 4 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2

ObjectiveThe objective of our study was to investigate tumor conspicuity and the discrimination potential for tumor aggressiveness on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) with high b value at 3-T.Materials and MethodsThe institutional review board approved this study and waived the requirement for informed consent. A total of 50 patients with prostate cancer (69 cancer foci; 48 in the PZ, 20 in the TZ, and one in whole prostate) who underwent multiparametric prostate MRI including DW-MRI (b values: 0, 1000 s/mm2 and 0, 2000 s/mm2) on a 3-T system were included. Lesion conspicuity score (LCS) using visual assessment (1 = invisible for surrounding normal site; 2 = slightly high intensity; 3 = moderately high; and 4 = very high) and tumor-normal signal intensity ratio (TNR) were assessed, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC, ×10−3 mm2/s) of the tumor regions and normal regions were measured.ResultsMean LCS and TNR at 0, 2000 s/mm2 was significantly higher than those at 0, 1000 s/mm2 (p<0.001 for both). In addition, ADC at both 0, 1000 and 0, 2000 s/mm2 was found to distinguish intermediate or high risk cancer with Gleason score ≥7 from low risk cancer with Gleason score ≤6 (p<0.001 for both). Furthermore, ADC of tumor regions correlated with Gleason score at both 0, 1000 s/mm2 (ρ = −0.602; p<0.001) and 0, 2000 s/mm2 (ρ = −0.645; p<0.001).ConclusionsFor tumor conspicuity and characterization of prostate cancer on DW-MRI of 3-T MRI, b = 0, 2000 s/mm2 is more useful than b = 0, 1000 s/mm2.