There is an association between Helicobacter pylori infection and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), and few studies have suggested that eradicative treatment of H. pylori infection may improve platelet counts in patients with ITP. Conventional treatments for ITP include immunosuppressive agents, and more recently thrombopoietic agents. However, based on clinical reports of association between H. pylori and ITP, several medical societies increasingly suggest detection and eradication of H. pylori as a treatment for ITP. In this article, we reappraise recent medical literature to determine the effectiveness of platelet response after treatment of H. pylori infection in patients with ITP. We searched two online databases (MEDLINE and Google Scholar) for full articles published between January 2008 and May 2018, and found a total of 11 studies that presented data and outcomes of treatment of H. pylori infection in ITP patients. All the studies administered triple therapy (amoxicillin 500 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg and a proton-pump inhibitor each given twice daily for either 7- or 14-day course) for eradication of H. pylori. Median overall platelet response ranged from 27 to 69.2% with a complete response rate ranging from 0 to 65.4% and a partial response rate ranging from 0 to 29.4%. Although there is variability in the effectiveness between different populations, it appears to be of benefit to ITP patients with concomitant H. pylori infection when treated with triple therapy. However, further studies to understand the pathogenesis of H. pylori-associated ITP is necessary for the development of new therapeutic approaches for ITP.
Dose-adjusted rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin (DA.R-EPOCH) is used for upfront treatment of high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In this study, we compared the outcomes in patients with high-risk DLBCL who received frontline rituximab, cycophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) or DA.R-EPOCH immunochemotherapy. Outcomes and treatment-related cost were analyzed. DLBCL with one of the following features were included in the study: MYC ± BCL2 or BCL6 rearrangement by FISH or MYC overexpression by immunohistochemistry, Ki67 index ≥ 80% or nongerminal center immunophenotype, tumor measuring ≥5 cm and NCCN-IPI score ≥4. A total of 80 patients were treated with R-CHOP (n = 52, 65%) or DA.R-EPOCH (n = 28, 35%), with a median follow-up of 11.2 months (range: 0.7-151.3 months). The hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival and overall survival were 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28%-2.29%, p = 0.67] and 0.86 (95% CI 0.26%-2.78%, p = 0.80), respectively for DA.R-EPOCH compared to R-CHOP. The total mean cost was USD106,940 ± USD39,351 and USD58,509 ± 24,588 for DA.R-EPOCH and R-CHOP respectively (p < 0.001). In our analysis, DA.R-EPOCH resulted comparable clinical outcomes and increased treatment-related expenses compared to R-CHOP in high-risk DLBCL.
Concurrent presentation of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with other hematologic diseases in the absence of previous chemotherapy or ionizing radiotherapy treatment is very rare. We present a case of simultaneous occurrence of APL with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A 43-yearold female presented with 3 month of history fatigue, night sweats, chills and pancytopenia. Bone marrow aspirate and biopsy demonstrated 20% myeloid blasts with dysplastic changes admixed with abnormal promyelocytes. Cytogenetic analysis showed tetraploidy and deletion in chromosomes 5q and 7q and polymerase chain reaction showed presence of PML/RARA mRNA transcripts, confirming the presence of concurrent APL and MDS-related AML. Induction chemotherapy with cytarabine and daunorubicin was initiated along with all-trans retinoic acid. This is the first case to be reported in the literature of concurrent occurrence of APL with MDS-related AML. Treatment with 7 + 3 regimen and ATRA was successful in inducing complete remission.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.