[Purpose] This study aims to describe a protocol based on neurocognitive therapeutic
exercises and determine its feasibility and usefulness for upper extremity functionality
when compared with a conventional protocol. [Subjects and Methods] Eight subacute stroke
patients were randomly assigned to a conventional (control group) or neurocognitive
(experimental group) treatment protocol. Both lasted 30 minutes, 3 times a week for 10
weeks and assessments were blinded. Outcome measures included: Motor Evaluation Scale for
Upper Extremity in Stroke Patients, Motricity Index, Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment
and Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire. Descriptive measures and nonparametric
statistical tests were used for analysis. [Results] The results indicate a more favorable
clinical progression in the neurocognitive group regarding upper extremity functional
capacity with achievement of the minimal detectable change. The functionality results are
related with improvements on muscle strength and sensory discrimination (tactile and
kinesthetic). [Conclusion] Despite not showing significant group differences between pre
and post-treatment, the neurocognitive approach could be a safe and useful strategy for
recovering upper extremity movement following stroke, especially regarding affected hands,
with better and longer lasting results. Although this work shows this protocol’s
feasibility with the panel of scales proposed, larger studies are required to demonstrate
its effectiveness.
Background
Accurate measurement of pain is required to improve its management and in research. The visual analog scale (VAS) on paper format has been shown to be an accurate, valid, reliable, and reproducible way to measure pain intensity. However, some limitations should be considered, some of which can be implemented with the introduction of an electronic VAS version, suitable to be used both in a tablet and a smartphone.
Objective
This study aimed to validate a new method of recording pain level by comparing the traditional paper VAS with the pain level module on the newly designed Interactive Clinics app.
Methods
A prospective observational cross-sectional study was designed. The sample consisted of 102 participants aged 18 to 65 years. A Force Dial FDK 20 algometer (Wagner Instruments) was employed to induce mild pressure symptoms on the participants’ thumbs. Pain was measured using a paper VAS (10 cm line) and the app.
Results
Intermethod reliability estimated by ICC(3,1) was 0.86 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.81 to 0.90, indicating good reliability. Intramethod reliability estimated by ICCa(3,1) was 0.86 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.81 to 0.90, also indicating good reliability. Bland-Altman analysis showed a difference of 0.175 (0.49), and limits of agreement ranged from –0.79 to 1.14.
Conclusions
The pain level module on the app is highly reliable and interchangeable with the paper VAS version. This tool could potentially help clinicians and researchers precisely assess pain in a simple, economic way with the use of a ubiquitous technology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.