Introduction Remote data collection, including the establishment of online registries, is a novel approach to efficiently identify risk for cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease (AD) in older adults, with growing evidence for feasibility and validity. Addition of genetic data to online registries has the potential to facilitate identification of older adults at risk and to advance the understanding of genetic contributions to AD. Methods 573 older adult participants with longitudinal online Brain Health Registry (BHR) data underwent apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotyping using remotely collected saliva samples and a novel, automated Biofluid Collection Management Portal. We evaluated acceptability of genetic sample collection and estimated associations between (1) sociodemographic variables and willingness to participate in genetics research and (2) APOE results and online cognitive and functional assessments. We also assessed acceptance of hypothetical genetics research participation by surveying a larger sample of 25,888 BHR participants. Results 51% of invited participants enrolled in the BHR genetics study, BHR‐GenePool Study (BHR‐GPS); 27% of participants had at least one APOE ε4 allele. Older participants and those with higher educational attainment were more likely to participate. In the remotely administered Cogstate Brief Battery, APOE ε4/ε4 homozygotes (HM) had worse online learning scores, and greater decline in processing speed and attention, compared to ε3/ε4 heterozygotes (HT) and ε4 non‐carriers (NC). Discussion APOE genotyping of more than 500 older adults enrolled in BHR supports the feasibility and validity of a novel, remote biofluids collection approach from a large cohort of older adults, with data linkage to longitudinal online cognitive data. This approach can be expanded for efficient collection of genetic data and other information from biofluids in the future.

BackgroundRemote, internet‐based methods for recruitment, screening, and longitudinally assessing older adults have the potential to greatly facilitate Alzheimer’s disease and related research, including clinical trials and observational studies.MethodsThe Brain Health Registry (BHR) is an online website and registry that includes a comprehensive battery of self‐ and study partner‐report questionnaires and online neuropsychological tests. Participants are asked to return at 6‐month intervals for longitudinal follow‐up. Recently, new online infrastructure for managing remote biomarker (saliva, blood) collection and for linking in‐clinic and online data were added. Multiple current initiatives aim to increase recruitment and engagement of underrepresented populations using digital, community engaged research strategies to improve generalizability of results. These include the recent launch of a Spanish‐language website, and projects focused on increasing enrollment and task completion of Black/African American and Hispanic/Latinx individuals.ResultsBHR includes >95,000 participants, >9000 of whom have enrolled study partners, 40% return for longitudinal follow up, 64% are age 55+, 80% are female, 80% identify as Non‐Latinx White, and 10% identify as Hispanic/Latinx. Participants have an average of 16.2 years of education. BHR has made >86,000 referrals to other studies, resulting in >5000 BHR participants enrolled in 25 different aging and AD observational studies and treatment trials. Over 2400 participants are co‐enrolled in BHR and collaborator studies, with online data linked to in‐clinic data. 573 participants have undergone APOE genotyping using remote saliva collection, and 629 have had blood collected using local phlebotomy for AD plasma biomarker analysis. Accumulating evidence supports the feasibility and validity of the approach, including associations with in‐clinic assessments, the ability to accurately detect MCI and enrichment for amyloid positivity.ConclusionsMajor advantages of the BHR approach are scalability and accessibility. Challenges include compliance, retention, and cohort diversity. Lessons learned from BHR, and components of the existing infrastructure, can be used to inform future remote clinical trial design. One such future effort is ADNI4. To facilitate enrollment of new participants, ADNI4 will establish an online recruitment and screening portal, with a remote phlebotomy component, to efficiently identify those from underrepresented populations, and those likely to have preclinical and prodromal AD.

IntroductionRemote, internet‐based methods for recruitment, screening, and longitudinally assessing older adults have the potential to facilitate Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials and observational studies.MethodsThe Brain Health Registry (BHR) is an online registry that includes longitudinal assessments including self‐ and study partner‐report questionnaires and neuropsychological tests. New initiatives aim to increase inclusion and engagement of commonly underincluded communities using digital, community‐engaged research strategies. New features include multilingual support and biofluid collection capabilities.ResultsBHR includes > 100,000 participants. BHR has made over 259,000 referrals resulting in 25,997 participants enrolled in 30 aging and AD studies. In addition, 28,278 participants are coenrolled in BHR and other studies with data linkage among studies. Data have been shared with 28 investigators. Recent efforts have facilitated the enrollment and engagement of underincluded ethnocultural communities.DiscussionThe major advantages of the BHR approach are scalability and accessibility. Challenges include compliance, retention, cohort diversity, and generalizability.Highlights Brain Health Registry (BHR) is an online, longitudinal platform of > 100,000 members. BHR made > 259,000 referrals, which enrolled 25,997 participants in 32 studies. New efforts increased enrollment and engagement of underincluded communities in BHR. The major advantages of the BHR approach are scalability and accessibility. BHR provides a unique adjunct for clinical neuroscience research.

Background: Effective and measurable participant recruitment methods are urgently needed for clinical studies in Alzheimer’s disease. Objectives: To develop methods for measuring recruitment tactics and evaluating effectiveness. Methods: Recruitment tactics for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI3) were measured using web and phone analytics, campaign metrics and survey responses. Results: A total of 462 new participants were enrolled into ADNI3 through recruitment efforts. We collected metrics on recruitment activities including 82,003 unique visitors to the recruitment website and 3,335 calls to study phone numbers. The recruitment sources that produced the most screening and enrollment included online advertisements, local radio and newspaper coverage and emails and referrals from registries. Conclusions: Analysis of recruitment activity obtained through tracking methods provided some insight for effective recruitment. ADNI3 can serve as an example of how a data-driven approach to centralized participant recruitment can be utilized to facilitate clinical research.