Entrainment and detrainment processes have been recognised for a long time as key processes for cumulus convection and have recently witnessed a regrowth of interest mainly due to the capability of large-eddy simulations (LES) to diagnose these processes in more detail. This article has a twofold purpose. Firstly, it provides a historical overview of the past research on these mixing processes, and secondly, it highlights more recent important developments. These include both fundamental process studies using LES aiming to improve our understanding of the mixing process, but also more practical studies targeted toward an improved parametrised representation of entrainment and detrainment in large-scale models. A highlight of the fundamental studies resolves a long-lasting controversy by showing that lateral entrainment is the dominant mixing mechanism in comparison with the cloud-top entrainment in shallow cumulus convection. The more practical studies provide a wide variety of new parametrisations with sometimes conflicting approaches to the way in which the effect of the free tropospheric humidity on the lateral mixing is taken into account. An important new insight that will be highlighted is that, despite the focus in the literature on entrainment, it appears that it is rather the detrainment process that determines the vertical structure of the convection in general and the mass flux especially. Finally, in order to speed up progress and stimulate convergence in future parametrisations, stronger and more systematic use of LES is advocated.

For a wide range of shallow cumulus convection cases, large-eddy simulation (LES) model results have been used to investigate lateral mixing as expressed by the fractional entrainment and fractional detrainment rates. It appears that the fractional entrainment rates show much less variation from hour to hour and case to case than the fractional detrainment rates. Therefore, in the parameterization proposed here, the fractional entrainment rates are assumed to be described as a fixed function of height, roughly following the LES results. Based on the LES results a new, more flexible parameterization for the detrainment process is developed that contains two important dependencies. First, based on cloud ensemble principles it can be understood that deeper cloud layers call for smaller detrainment rates. All current mass flux schemes ignore this cloud-height dependence, which evidently leads to large discrepancies with observed mass flux profiles. The new detrainment formulation deals with this dependence by considering the mass flux profile in a nondimensionalized way. Second, both relative humidity of the environmental air and the buoyancy excess of the updraft influence the detrainment rates and, therefore, the mass flux profiles. This influence can be taken into account by borrowing a parameter from the buoyancy-sorting concept and using it in a bulk sense. LES results show that with this bulk parameter, the effect of environmental conditions on the fractional detrainment rate can be accurately described. A simple, practical but flexible parameterization for the fractional detrainment rate is derived and evaluated in a single-column model (SCM) for three different shallow cumulus cases, which shows the clear potential of this parameterization. The proposed parameterization is an attractive and more robust alternative for existing, more complex, buoyancy-sortingbased mixing schemes, and can be easily incorporated in current mass flux schemes.

vertical velocity, new formulae for entrainment and detrainment rates can be expressed in terms of buoyancy, vertical velocity and cloud fraction. For a variety of shallow convection cases, results from large-eddy simulations show a good correspondence of these new formulae with more traditional methods to diagnose entrainment and detrainment rates. Moreover, the formulae give insight into the behaviour and the physical nature of the mixing coefficients. They explain the observed large variability of the detrainment. The formulae cannot be directly applied as a parametrization. However, it is demonstrated how they can be used to evaluate existing parametrization approaches and as a sound physical base for future parametrization developments.

No abstract

No abstract