Aim COVID‐19 is associated with an exacerbated inflammatory response that can result in fatal outcomes. Systemic inflammation is also a main characteristic of periodontitis. Therefore, we investigated the association of periodontitis with COVID‐19 complications. Materials and Methods A case–control study was performed using the national electronic health records of the State of Qatar between February and July 2020. Cases were defined as patients who suffered COVID‐19 complications (death, ICU admissions or assisted ventilation), and controls were COVID‐19 patients discharged without major complications. Periodontal conditions were assessed using dental radiographs from the same database. Associations between periodontitis and COVID 19 complications were analysed using logistic regression models adjusted for demographic, medical and behaviour factors. Results In total, 568 patients were included. After adjusting for potential confounders, periodontitis was associated with COVID‐19 complication including death (OR = 8.81, 95% CI 1.00–77.7), ICU admission (OR = 3.54, 95% CI 1.39–9.05) and need for assisted ventilation (OR = 4.57, 95% CI 1.19–17.4). Similarly, blood levels of white blood cells, D‐dimer and C Reactive Protein were significantly higher in COVID‐19 patients with periodontitis. Conclusion Periodontitis was associated with higher risk of ICU admission, need for assisted ventilation and death of COVID‐19 patients, and with increased blood levels of biomarkers linked to worse disease outcomes.

Dentistry increasingly integrates artificial intelligence (AI) to help improve the current state of clinical dental practice. However, this revolutionary technological field raises various complex ethical challenges. The objective of this systematic scoping review is to document the current uses of AI in dentistry and the ethical concerns or challenges they imply. Three health care databases (MEDLINE [PubMed], SciVerse Scopus, and Cochrane Library) and 2 computer science databases (ArXiv, IEEE Xplore) were searched. After identifying 1,553 records, the documents were filtered, and a full-text screening was performed. In total, 178 studies were retained and analyzed by 8 researchers specialized in dentistry, AI, and ethics. The team used Covidence for data extraction and Dedoose for the identification of ethics-related information. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Among the included studies, 130 (73.0%) studies were published after 2016, and 93 (52.2%) were published in journals specialized in computer sciences. The technologies used were neural learning techniques for 75 (42.1%), traditional learning techniques for 76 (42.7%), or a combination of several technologies for 20 (11.2%). Overall, 7 countries contributed to 109 (61.2%) studies. A total of 53 different applications of AI in dentistry were identified, involving most dental specialties. The use of initial data sets for internal validation was reported in 152 (85.4%) studies. Forty-five ethical issues (related to the use AI in dentistry) were reported in 22 (12.4%) studies around 6 principles: prudence (10 times), equity (8), privacy (8), responsibility (6), democratic participation (4), and solidarity (4). The ratio of studies mentioning AI-related ethical issues has remained similar in the past years, showing that there is no increasing interest in the field of dentistry on this topic. This study confirms the growing presence of AI in dentistry and highlights a current lack of information on the ethical challenges surrounding its use. In addition, the scarcity of studies sharing their code could prevent future replications. The authors formulate recommendations to contribute to a more responsible use of AI technologies in dentistry.

Background In previous studies, COVID-19 complications were reported to be associated with periodontitis. Accordingly, this study was designed to test the hypothesis that a history of periodontal therapy could be associated with lower risk of COVID-19 complications. Methods A case–control study was performed using the medical health records of COVID-19 patients in the State of Qatar between March 2020 and February 2021 and dental records between January 2017 and December 2021. Cases were defined as COVID-19 patients who suffered complications (death, ICU admissions and/or mechanical ventilation); controls were COVID-19 patients who recovered without major complications. Associations between a history of periodontal therapy and COVID-19 complications were analysed using logistic regression models adjusted for demographic and medical factors. Blood parameters were compared using Kruskal–Wallis test. Results In total, 1,325 patients were included. Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) analysis revealed that non-treated periodontitis was associated with significant risk of need for mechanical ventilation (AOR = 3.91, 95% CI 1.21–12.57, p = 0.022) compared to periodontally healthy patients, while treated periodontitis was not (AOR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.25–6.58, p = 0.768). Blood analyses revealed that periodontitis patients with a history of periodontal therapy had significantly lower levels of D-dimer and Ferritin than non-treated periodontitis patients. Conclusion Among COVID-19 patients with periodontal bone loss, only those that have not received periodontal therapy had higher risk of need for assisted ventilation. COVID-19 patients with a history of periodontal therapy were associated with significantly lower D-dimer levels than those without recent records of periodontal therapy. Clinical relevance The fact that patients with treated periodontitis were less likely to suffer COVID-19 complications than non-treated ones further strengthen the hypothesis linking periodontitis to COVID-19 complications and suggests that managing periodontitis could help reduce the risk for COVID-19 complications, although future research is needed to verify this.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is mostly a mild condition, however, in some patients, it could progress into a severe and even fatal disease. Recent studies have shown that COVID-19 infection and severity could be associated with the presence of periodontitis, one of the most prevalent chronic diseases. This association could be explained by the fact that periodontitis and COVID-19 share some common risk factors that included chronic diseases, such as diabetes and hypertension as well as conditions such as age, sex, and genetic variants. Another possible explanation could be the systemic inflammation and the aspiration of periodontopathogens seen in patients with periodontitis, which could have a synergism with the virus or compromise the reaction of the body against COVID-19. This narrative review explores the nature of these associations, the evidence behind them, and their implications.

e18016 Background: Chronotherapy in cancer is optimizing the administration time of anti-cancer treatment according to circadian rhythm and cellular phase to improve the efficacy against tumor cells while decreasing side effects on normal cells. Several randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluated chronotherapy of chemotherapy (chrono-chemotherapy: time-specific infusions) and/or radiotherapy (chrono-radiotherapy: morning radiotherapy) in various cancers and reported improved treatment efficacy and reduced toxicity. However, the effect of chronotherapy in HNC treatment is unclear as there are no prior systematic reviews reported. Therefore, this systematic review summarizes available clinical evidence on the effect of chrono-chemotherapy (CCT) and chrono-radiotherapy (CRT) on treatment response and adverse events in HNC adult patients. Methods: We conducted a systematic search using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) in four online databases (OVID, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus), and 6078 articles identified were published in English between the databases' inception date and June 30, 2022. We included original peer-reviewed retrospective and prospective human studies investigating CCT and/or CRT versus conventional treatments in HNC patients. We excluded articles that contained no abstract, were unrelated to HNC, were pre-clinical and case reports, or did not include time-specific interventions in their methods. Results: 16 studies were finally included. Overall, studies were heterogenous in demographics, study design, intervention, and outcome measures, thus meta-analysis could not be performed. Nine studies (RCT = 3, Non-RCT = 2 & Retro = 4) investigated CRT. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was mainly reported as the primary tumor (stage I-II). 7/9 studies reported a significant reduction in the incidence of oral mucositis (Grade ≥3) in the CRT group as opposed to conventional radiotherapy (RT) groups (p < 0.05). In contrast, treatment response was investigated in 4/9 studies and was insignificant (p > 0.05). Seven studies (RCT = 5 & Retro = 2) investigated CCT in patients diagnosed with SSC (stage II-IV). All included studies had concurrent RT. Different chemotherapeutic agents were used in combinations or as a single agent, namely Cisplatin, 5- Fu, Paclitaxel and Docetaxel. CCT groups in all studies achieved a significant reduction in Nausea & Vomiting (Grade ≥3), while a significant reduction in Leukopenia & Thrombocytopenia (Grade ≥3) was reported in 2 studies only (p < 0.05). Treatment response (OS and PFS) was not significantly different (p > 0.05) between both groups except 2 studies reported significantly higher ORR in chronotherapy groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions: CCT and CRT in HNC treatment in most studies provided evidence of toxicity reduction while treatment response was maintained. However, large multicentric randomized controlled studies with standardized protocols and optimized designs are still needed.