Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is regarded as an effective solution for relapsed or refractory tumors, particularly for hematological malignancies. Although the initially approved anti-CD19 CART therapy has produced impressive outcomes, setbacks such as high relapse rates and resistance were experienced, driving the need to discover engineered CART cells that are more effective for therapeutic use. Innovations in the structure and manufacturing of CART cells have resulted in significant improvements in efficacy and persistence, particularly with the development of fourth-generation CART cells. Paired with an immune modifier, the use of fourthgeneration and next-generation CART cells will not be limited because of cytotoxic effects and will be an efficient tool for overcoming the tumor microenvironment. In this review, we summarize the recent transformations in the ectodomain, transmembrane domain, and endodomain of the CAR structure, which, together with innovative manufacturing technology and improved cell sources, improve the prospects for the future development of CART cell therapy.

Background To investigate the prognostic risk factors and postoperative recurrence of bladder cancer in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs). Methods Data of 439 UTUC patients were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up and analysis of smoking effects, consumption of traditional Chinese medicine containing aristolochic acid, history of bladder cancer, age, sex, presence or absence of diabetes mellitus (DM), metformin use, tumor characteristics (number, location, stage, grade), and open or laparoscopic surgery on the prognosis of UTUCs were performed. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to analyze the relationship between various factors and the postoperative survival rate. The survival rate was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Moreover, logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the relationship between the above mentioned factors and postoperative recurrence of bladder cancer. Results Overall, 439 patients met, including 236 males (53.7%) and 203 females (46.3%), the criteria for the final statistical analysis, and the average age was 66.7 years. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of 439 UTUC patients were 90.0, 76.4, and 67.7%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates of T1, T2, T3, and T4 patients were 90.2%, 78%, 43.8%, and 18.5%, respectively. Factors influencing the long-term survival rate of UTUC patients were smoking, taking traditional Chinese medicine containing aristolochic acid, history of bladder cancer, age, tumor size, tumor stage, tumor grade, and lymph node metastasis. The risk factors related to postoperative bladder cancer recurrence were advanced tumor stage, high grade tumor, preoperative ureteroscopy, ureteral urothelial carcinoma, no postoperative bladder perfusion chemotherapy and DM without metformin use. Conclusions Advanced tumor stage and presence of a high-grade tumor were risk factors for not only poor UTUC prognosis but also BC recurrence. In addition, preoperative ureteroscopy, ureteral urothelial carcinoma and DM without metformin use were high risk factors for BC recurrence, whereas regular postoperative bladder perfusion chemotherapy was a protective factor.

We performed a retrospective, case-control study to evaluate whether the urine flow acceleration (UFA, mL/s(2)) is superior to maximum uroflow (Qmax, mL/s) in diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In this study, a total of 50 men with BPH (age: 58±12.5 years) and 50 controls (age: 59±13.0 years) were included. A pressure-flow study was used to determine the presence of BOO according to the recommendations of Incontinence Control Society (ICS). The results showed that the UFA and Qmax in BPH group were much lower than those in the control group [(2.05±0.85) vs. (4.60±1.25) mL/s(2) and (8.50±1.05) vs. (13.00±3.35) mL/s] (P<0.001). According to the criteria (UFA<2.05 mL/s(2), Qmax<10 mL/s), the sensitivity and specificity of UFA vs. Qmax in diagnosing BOO were 88%, 75% vs. 81%, 63%. UFA vs. Omax, when compared with the results of P-Q chart (the kappa values in corresponding analysis), was 0.55 vs. 0.35. The prostate volume, post void residual and detrusor pressure at Qmax between the two groups were 28.6±9.8 vs. 24.2±7.6 mL, 60.4±1.4 vs. 21.3±2.5 mL and 56.6±8.3 vs. 21.7±6.1 cmH2O, respectively (P<0.05). It was concluded that the UFA is a useful urodynamic parameter, and is superior to Qmax in diagnosing BOO in patients with BPH.

No abstract