Background Despite best current therapy, up to 20% of pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have a relapse. Recent genomewide analyses have identified a high frequency of DNA copy-number abnormalities in ALL, but the prognostic implications of these abnormalities have not been defined. Methods We studied a cohort of 221 children with high-risk B-cell–progenitor ALL with the use of single-nucleotide–polymorphism microarrays, transcriptional profiling, and resequencing of samples obtained at diagnosis. Children with known very-high-risk ALL subtypes (i.e., BCR-ABL1–positive ALL, hypodiploid ALL, and ALL in infants) were excluded from this cohort. A copy-number abnormality was identified as a predictor of poor outcome, and it was then tested in an independent validation cohort of 258 patients with B-cell–progenitor ALL. Results More than 50 recurring copy-number abnormalities were identified, most commonly involving genes that encode regulators of B-cell development (in 66.8% of patients in the original cohort); PAX5 was involved in 31.7% and IKZF1 in 28.6% of patients. Using copy-number abnormalities, we identified a predictor of poor outcome that was validated in the independent validation cohort. This predictor was strongly associated with alteration of IKZF1, a gene that encodes the lymphoid transcription factor IKAROS. The gene-expression signature of the group of patients with a poor outcome revealed increased expression of hematopoietic stem-cell genes and reduced expression of B-cell–lineage genes, and it was similar to the signature of BCR-ABL1–positive ALL, another high-risk subtype of ALL with a high frequency of IKZF1 deletion. Conclusions Genetic alteration of IKZF1 is associated with a very poor outcome in B-cell–progenitor ALL.

Background We conducted a clinical trial to test whether prophylactic cranial irradiation could be omitted in all children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Methods A total of 498 evaluable patients were enrolled. Treatment intensity was based on presenting features and the level of minimal residual disease after remission induction treatment. Continuous complete remission was compared between the 71 patients who previously would have received prophylactic cranial irradiation and the 56 historical controls who received it. Results The 5-year event-free and overall survival probabilities (95% confidence interval) for all 498 patients were 85.6% (79.9% to 91.3%) and 93.5% (89.8% to 97.2%), respectively. The 5-year cumulative risk of isolated central-nervous-system (CNS) relapse was 2.7% (1.1% to 4.2%), and that of any CNS relapse (isolated plus combined) was 3.9% (1.9% to 5.9%). The 71 patients had significantly better continuous complete remission than the 56 historical controls (P=0.04). All 11 patients with isolated CNS relapse remain in second remission for 0.4 to 5.5 years. CNS leukemia (CNS-3 status) or a traumatic lumbar puncture with blasts at diagnosis and a high level of minimal residual disease (≥ 1%) after 6 weeks of remission induction were significantly associated with poorer event-free survival. Risk factors for CNS relapse included the presence of the t(1;19)[TCF3-PBX1], any CNS involvement at diagnosis, and T-cell immunophenotype. Common adverse effects included allergic reactions to L-asparaginase, osteonecrosis, thrombosis, and disseminated fungal infection. Conclusions With effective risk-adjusted chemotherapy, prophylactic cranial irradiation can be safely omitted in the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is an im- IntroductionThe presence of minimal residual disease (MRD) following therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has been shown to be an important prognostic marker in many studies. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] MRD is typically detected either by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of clonotypic immunoglobulin or T-cell receptor gene rearrangements [20][21][22][23][24][25][26] or by flow cytometry, 27-41 the latter based on the principle that leukemic cells express combinations of antigens that are different from those present on normal bone marrow cells. The former technique can be more sensitive, though to achieve adequate sensitivity it is necessary to synthesize optimized clonespecific reagents. As a consequence, it is difficult to obtain real-time data that could be used for early intervention.Molecular detection of MRD has been well standardized. 25,[42][43][44] Though less widely standardized, 37,45 flow cytometry is faster, generally less expensive, and provides informative results in a higher percentage of patients than molecular methods. For these reasons, flow-based MRD assessment has the potential for rapidly identifying patients at increased risk of relapse, allowing for prompt changes in therapy, including earlier intensification. 7 Both PCR and flow have successfully been used to help risk-stratify patients, and while there is generally concordance between the methods in direct comparisons, 46,47 individual patients may not always be classified in the same way by each method. 48 Although the prognostic significance of MRD in ALL is well established, and is used as a criterion for risk stratification in many current studies, 49,50 most published studies have been relatively small. In childhood ALL in particular, the value of MRD must be weighed against other well-established prognostic variables, including age, white blood cell count, cytogenetic features of blasts, and conventional assessment of response to therapy. [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] Although MRD has been shown to retain prognostic significance after adjusting for some common risk factors, 4,6,19 the relationship between MRD and other prognostic factors has been incompletely explored. It is not clear if MRD by itself is all that is needed to predict outcome, if other risk factors add additional information to that obtained by MRD, or whether there are complex interactions between MRD and other factors. For example, we previously showed a difference between the frequency of positive MRD results at end induction in patients with the 2 most common The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked ''advertisement'' in accordance with 18 USC section 1734. For personal use only. on May 12, 2018. by guest www.bloodjournal.org From favorable genetic lesions: the TEL-AML1 translocation and simultaneous trisomies of chromosomes 4 and 10, w...

Summary Background We sought to improve outcome of childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by applying risk-directed therapy based on the genetic abnormalities of the leukemic cells and measurements of minimal residual disease (MRD) as determined by flow cytometry during treatment. Methods From October 13, 2002 to June 19, 2008, 232 patients with de novo AML (n=206), therapy- or myelodysplasia-related AML (n=12), or mixed-lineage leukemia (n=14) were enrolled at eight centers. Block, nonblinded randomization, stratified by cytogenetic or morphologic subtype, assigned patients to high-dose (18 g/m2, n=113) or low-dose (2 g/m2, n=117) cytarabine (A), given together with daunorubicin (D) and etoposide (E) (Induction I); achievement of MRD negative status was the primary endpoint. Induction II consisted of ADE with or without gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO); consolidation therapy included three additional courses of chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Levels of MRD were used to allocate GO and determine the timing of Induction II; both MRD and genetic abnormalities at diagnosis were used to determine final risk classification. Low-risk patients (n=68) received 5 courses of chemotherapy, whereas high-risk patients (n=79), as well as standard-risk patients (n=69) with matched sibling donors, were eligible for HSCT (performed in 48 high and 8 standard-risk patients). All randomized patients (n=230) were analyzed for the primary endpoint. The other analyses were limited to the 216 patients with AML, excluding mixed-lineage leukemia. This trial, closed to accrual, is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov, number NCT00136084. Findings The complete remission rates were 80% (173 of the 216) after Induction I and 94% (203 of 216) after Induction II. Induction failures included two toxic deaths and 10 cases of resistant leukemia. The introduction of high-dose cytarabine did not significantly lower the rate of MRD positivity after Induction I therapy (34% vs. 42%, P=0.17). The cumulative incidences of grade 3 or greater infection were 79.3% ± 4.0% and 75.5% ± 4.2% for patients treated on the high-dose or low-dose arms. The 3-year estimates (± SE) of event-free and overall survival were 63.0% ± 4.1% and 71.1% ± 3.8%, respectively. Achievement of MRD < 0.1% after Induction II identified a large group of patients (80%) with a cumulative incidence of relapse of only 17% ± 3%. Post-Induction I MRD ≥ 1% was the only independent adverse prognostic factor that was statistically significant (P < 0.05) for both event-free (HR, 2.41; CI 1.36–4.26; P=0.003) and overall survival (HR, 2.11; CI 1.09–4.11; P=0.028). Interpretation Our findings suggest that the use of targeted chemotherapy and HSCT, in the context of a comprehensive risk-stratification strategy based on genetic features and MRD findings, can improve the outcome of childhood AML.

No abstract