BackgroundReprogramming of cardiac fibroblasts into induced cardiomyocyte‐like cells represents a promising potential new therapy for treating heart disease, inducing significant improvements in postinfarct ventricular function in rodent models. Because reprogramming factors effective in transdifferentiating rodent cells are not sufficient to reprogram human cells, we sought to identify reprogramming factors potentially applicable to human studies.Methods and ResultsLentivirus vectors expressing Gata4, Mef2c, and Tbx5 (GMT); Hand2 (H), Myocardin (My), or microRNA (miR)‐590 were administered to rat, porcine, and human cardiac fibroblasts in vitro. induced cardiomyocyte‐like cell production was then evaluated by assessing expression of the cardiomyocyte marker, cardiac troponin T (cTnT), whereas signaling pathway studies were performed to identify reprogramming factor targets. GMT administration induced cTnT expression in ≈6% of rat fibroblasts, but failed to induce cTnT expression in porcine or human cardiac fibroblasts. Addition of H/My and/or miR‐590 to GMT administration resulted in cTNT expression in ≈5% of porcine and human fibroblasts and also upregulated the expression of the cardiac genes, MYH6 and TNNT2. When cocultured with murine cardiomyocytes, cTnT‐expressing porcine cardiac fibroblasts exhibited spontaneous contractions. Administration of GMT plus either H/My or miR‐590 alone also downregulated fibroblast genes COL1A1 and COL3A1. miR‐590 was shown to directly suppress the zinc finger protein, specificity protein 1 (Sp1), which was able to substitute for miR‐590 in inducing cellular reprogramming.ConclusionsThese data support porcine studies as a surrogate for testing human cardiac reprogramming, and suggest that miR‐590‐mediated repression of Sp1 represents an alternative pathway for enhancing human cardiac cellular reprogramming.
Objective
The reprogramming of cardiac fibroblasts into induced cardiomyocyte-like cells improves ventricular function in myocardial infarction models. Only integrating persistent expression vectors have thus far been used to induce reprogramming, potentially limiting its clinical applicability. We therefore tested the reprogramming potential of nonintegrating, acute expression adenoviral (Ad) vectors.
Methods
Ad or lentivirus vectors encoding Gata4 (G), Mef2c (M), and Tbx5 (T) were validated in vitro. Sprague-Dawley rats then underwent coronary ligation and Ad-mediated administration of vascular endothelial growth factor to generate infarct prevascularization. Three weeks later, animals received Ad or lentivirus encoding G, M, or T (AdGMT or LentiGMT) or an equivalent dose of a null vector (n = 11, 10, and 10, respectively). Outcomes were analyzed by echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and histology.
Results
Ad and lentivirus vectors provided equivalent G, M, and T expression in vitro. AdGMT and LentiGMT both likewise induced expression of the cardiomyocyte marker cardiac troponin T in approximately 6% of cardiac fibroblasts versus <1% cardiac troponin T expression in AdNull (adenoviral vector that does not encode a transgene)-treated cells. Infarcted myocardium that had been treated with AdGMT likewise demonstrated greater density of cells expressing the cardiomyocyte marker beta myosin heavy chain 7 compared with AdNull-treated animals. Echocardiography demonstrated that AdGMT and LentiGMT both increased ejection fraction compared with AdNull (AdGMT: 21% ± 3%, LentiGMT: 14% ± 5%, AdNull: −0.4% ± 2%; P < .05).
Conclusions
Ad vectors are at least as effective as lentiviral vectors in inducing cardiac fibroblast transdifferentiation into induced cardiomyocyte-like cells and improving cardiac function in postinfarct rat hearts. Short-term expression Ad vectors may represent an important means to induce cardiac cellular reprogramming in humans.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.