Studies on circadian entrainment have traditionally been performed under controlled laboratory conditions. Although these studies have served the purpose of providing a broad framework for our understanding of regulation of rhythmic behaviors under cyclic conditions, they do not reveal how organisms keep time in nature. Although a few recent studies have attempted to address this, it is not yet clear which environmental factors regulate rhythmic behaviors in nature and how. Here, we report the results of our studies aimed at examining (i) whether and how changes in natural light affect activity/rest rhythm and (ii) what the functional significance of this rhythmic behavior might be. We found that wild-type strains of fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, display morning (M), afternoon (A), and evening (E) peaks of activity under seminatural conditions (SN), whereas under constant darkness in otherwise SN, they exhibited M and E peaks, and under constant light in SN, only the E peak occurred. Unlike the A peak, which requires exposure to bright light in the afternoon, light information is dispensable for the M and E peaks. Visual examination of behaviors suggests that the M peak is associated with courtship-related locomotor activity and the A peak is due to an artifact of the experimental protocol and largely circadian clock independent.circadian rhythms | chronoethogram | courtship | period mutants | afternoon peak T he role of circadian clocks in the temporal regulation of behaviors has been studied mostly under controlled laboratory conditions (1). Because simplified laboratory protocols are far removed from the reality of nature, these studies are limited in their ability to reveal the true features of circadian behavior in nature. For instance, laboratory studies mostly use square waves of one zeitgeber (time cue) such as light or temperature, or in rare cases, a combination of the two, quite unlike multiple, simultaneous, stochastic, and gradually changing factors in nature (2-6). Few recent studies on activity/rest and adult emergence rhythms of fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, under seminatural (SN) conditions reported significant differences in the patterns of these rhythms from those observed in the laboratory (2-6). For instance, adult emergence rhythm was more robust under SN compared with the laboratory, and even the period null (per 0 ) flies exhibited rhythmicity (3). An additional afternoon (A) peak of activity was reported under SN (4), which had never been observed in any standard laboratory protocol. Several features of the activity/rest rhythm (anticipation to twilight transitions and midday siesta) were absent under SN, and certain features of the rhythm such as crepuscular pattern and dominance of light over temperature were proposed to be artifacts of laboratory studies (4). The temporal profiles of neuronal expression of clock proteins, PERIOD and TIMELESS were also found to differ between laboratory and nature (6).At present, the available literature is limited to descriptions of rh...

In insects, the role of circadian clocks in the temporal regulation of adult emergence rhythm under natural conditions has not previously been reported. Here we present the results of a study aimed at examining the time course and waveform of emergence rhythm in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster under seminatural condition (SN). We studied this rhythm in wild-type and clock mutant flies under SN in parallel with laboratory condition (LAB) to examine (1) how the rhythm differs between SN and LAB, (2) what roles the circadian clock protein PERIOD and the circadian photoreceptor CRYPTOCHROME (CRY) play in the regulation of emergence rhythm under SN, and (3) whether there is seasonality in the rhythm. Under SN, wild-type flies displayed tightly gated emergence, peaking at "dawn" and gradually tapering down toward the evening, with little or no emergence by night, while in LAB, flies emerged throughout the light phase of light-dark (LD) cycles. The period loss-of-function mutant (per ( 0 )) flies were arrhythmic in LAB but displayed weak rhythmic emergence under SN. Under SN, cry mutants displayed less robust rhythm with wider gates, greater variance in peak timing, and enhanced nighttime emergence compared to controls. Furthermore, flies showed seasonal variation in emergence rhythm, coupled either to light or to humidity/temperature depending on the severity of environmental conditions. These results suggest that adult emergence rhythm of Drosophila is more robust in nature, is coupled to environmental cycles, and shows seasonal variations.

Fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster females display rhythmic egg-laying under 12:12 h light/dark (LD) cycles which persists with near 24 h periodicity under constant darkness (DD). We have shown previously that persistence of this rhythm does not require the neurons expressing pigment dispersing factor (PDF), thought to be the canonical circadian pacemakers, and proposed that it could be controlled by peripheral clocks or regulated/triggered by the act of mating. We assayed egg-laying behaviour of wild-type Canton S (CS) females under LD, DD and constant light (LL) conditions in three different physiological states; as virgins, as females allowed to mate with males for 1 day and as females allowed to mate for the entire duration of the assay. Here, we report the presence of a circadian rhythm in egg-laying in virgin D. melanogaster females. We also found that egg-laying behaviour of 70 and 90% females from all the three male presence/absence protocols follows circadian rhythmicity under DD and LL, with periods ranging between 18 and 30 h. The egg-laying rhythm of all virgin females synchronized to LD cycles with a peak occurring soon after lights-off. The rhythm in virgins was remarkably robust with maximum number of eggs deposited immediately after lights-off in contrast to mated females which show higher egg-laying during the day. These results suggest that the egg-laying rhythm of D. melanogaster is endogenously driven and is neither regulated nor triggered by the act of mating; instead, the presence of males results in reduction in entrainment to LD cycles.

Here we report the results of a study aimed at examining stability of adult emergence and activity/rest rhythms under semi-natural conditions (henceforth SN), in four large outbred fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster populations, selected for emergence in a narrow window of time under laboratory (henceforth LAB) light/dark (LD) cycles. When assessed under LAB, selected flies display enhanced stability in terms of higher amplitude, synchrony and accuracy in emergence and activity rhythms compared to controls. The present study was conducted to assess whether such differences in stability between selected and control populations, persist under SN where several gradually changing time-cues are present in their strongest form. The study revealed that under SN, emergence waveform of selected flies was modified, with even more enhanced peak and narrower gate-width compared to those observed in the LAB and compared to control populations in SN. Furthermore, flies from selected populations continued to exhibit enhanced synchrony and accuracy in their emergence and activity rhythms under SN compared to controls. Further analysis of zeitgeber effects revealed that enhanced stability in the rhythmicity of selected flies under SN was primarily due to increased sensitivity to light because emergence and activity rhythms of selected flies were as stable as controls under temperature cycles. These results thus suggest that stability of circadian rhythms in fruit flies D. melanogaster, which evolved as a consequence of selection for emergence in a narrow window of time under weak zeitgeber condition of LAB, persists robustly in the face of day-to-day variations in cycling environmental factors of nature.

BackgroundPrevious studies have implicated a role for circadian clocks in regulating pre-adult development of organisms. Among them two approaches are most notable: 1) use of insects whose clocks have different free-running periods and 2) imposition of artificial selection on either rate of development, timing of emergence or circadian period in laboratory populations. Using these two approaches, influence of clock on rate of development has been elucidated. However, the contribution of circadian clocks in determining time taken for pre-adult development has remained unclear. Here we present results of our studies aimed to understand this influence by examining populations of fruit flies carrying three different alleles of the period gene and hence having different free-running periods. We tried to achieve similarity of genetic background among the three strains while also ensuring that they harbored sufficient variation on loci other than period gene.ResultsWe find that under constant conditions, flies with long period have slower development whereas in presence of light-dark cycles (LD) of various lengths, the speed of development for each genotype is influenced by whether their eclosion rhythms can entrain to them. Under LD 12:12 (T24), where all three strains entrain, they do not show any difference in time taken for emergence, whereas under LD 10:10 (T20) where long period flies do not entrain and LD 14:14 (T28) where short period flies do not entrain, they have slower and faster pre-adult development, respectively, compared to the controls. We also show that a prior stage in development namely pupation is not rhythmic though time taken for pupation is determined by both the environmental cycle and period allele.ConclusionWe discuss how in presence of daily time cues, interaction of the cyclic environmental factors with the clock determines the position and width of the gate available for a fly to emerge (duration of time within a cycle when adult emergence can occur) resulting in an altered developmental duration from that observed under constant conditions. We also discuss the relevance of genetic background influencing this regulation.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12861-018-0180-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The present study explored relationships between personality traits; boldness, activity and 2 sociability, and lateralized utilization of brain hemispheres in the hatchery reared juveniles of Deccan Mahseer (Tor khudree), a game fish inhabiting the rivers of central and southern 2 India. Our results revealed a significant positive correlation between boldness and activity in 2 this species when tested in isolation. However, boldness was positively correlated with the 2 time spent near the individual conspecific but not with the individual alien invasive 2 heterospecific tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus). Although juvenile Deccan mahseer 3 exhibited significant variation in the preference towards conspecific over heterospecific, no 3 divergence in the utilization of right or left eye was seen while observing these individuals 3 suggesting the lack of lateralized utilization of the brain hemispheres. Furthermore, laterality 3 in visual preference failed to show any significant correlation with any of the personality 3 traits tested in this species. Results are discussed in the light of the existing literature on the 3 impact of life in homogenous hatchery conditions on the behaviour, personality traits and 3 cognitive abilities of fishes.

The stability of circadian clock mechanisms under cyclic environments contributes to increased Darwinian fitness by accurately timing daily behavior and physiology. Earlier studies on biological clocks speculated that the timing of behavior and its accuracy are determined by the intrinsic period (τ) of the circadian clock under constant conditions, its stability, the period of the external cycle (T), and resetting of the clock by environmental time cues. However, most of these previous studies suffered from certain limitations, the major ones being a narrow range of examined τ values and a non-uniformity in the genetic background across the individuals tested. We present data that rigorously test the following hypotheses by employing Drosophila melanogaster fruit flies with τ ranging from 17 to 30 h in a uniform genetic background. We tested whether 1) precision (day-to-day stability of τ) is greater for clocks with τ close to 24 h; 2) accuracy (i.e., day-to-day stability of the phase relationship (ψ), where ψ is the duration between a phase of the rhythm and a phase of the external cycle) is greater for clocks with τ close to 24 h; 3) Ψ is delayed with an increase in τ; and 4) Ψ becomes more advanced with an increase in length of zeitgeber cycle (T). We show that precision is not always maximum for ~24-h clocks, but that accuracy is greatest when τ approximates T. Further, flies exhibit a delayed phase relationship with increasing τ and an advanced phase relationship under long T-cycles as compared with shorter T-cycles. We also describe relationships between activity and rest durations and how our observations fit predictions from models of circadian entrainment. Overall, we confirm that accuracy and phase of entrained rhythm are governed by both intrinsic clock period and the length of the external cycle; however, we find that the relationship between intrinsic period and precision does not fit previous predictions.

Amplitude modulation in limit cycle models of circadian clocks has been previously formulated to explain the phenomenon of temperature compensation. These models propose that invariance of clock period (τ) with changing temperature is a result of the system traversing small or large limit cycles such that despite a decrease or an increase in the linear velocity of the clock owing to slowing down or speeding up of the underlying biochemical reactions, respectively, the angular velocity and, thus, the clock period remain constant. In addition, these models predict that phase resetting behavior of circadian clocks described by limit cycles of different amplitudes at low or high temperatures will be drastically different. More specifically, this class of models predicts that at low temperatures, circadian clocks will respond to perturbations by eliciting larger phase shifts by virtue of their smaller amplitude and vice versa. Here, we present the results of our tests of this prediction: We examined the nature of photic phase response curves (PRCs) and phase transition curves (PTCs) for the circadian clocks of 4 wild-type fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster populations at 3 different ambient temperatures (18, 25, and 29 °C). Interestingly, we observed that at the low temperature of 18 °C, fly clocks respond to light perturbations more strongly, eliciting strong (type 0) PRCs and PTCs, while at moderate (25 °C) and high (29 °C) temperatures the same stimuli evoke weak (type 1) responses. This pattern of strong and weak phase resetting at low and high temperatures, respectively, renders support for the limit cycle amplitude modulation model for temperature compensation of circadian clocks.