Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) is a recently developed method of comparative sequencing based upon heteroduplex detection. To assess the reliability of this method, 180 different mutations (54 deletions, 12 insertions, and 117 single base substitutions) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were tested. Second, 25 index individuals with complete DHPLC analysis of BRCA1 were reanalyzed by dye-terminator sequencing. Third, 41 index individuals were analyzed concomitantly by both DGGE and DHPLC. Of the 180 different BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, 179 showed heterozygous DHPLC elution profiles. Dye-terminator sequencing of the entire BRCA1 gene, including 5592 bp of coding sequence and 5206 bp of flanking noncoding sequence, in 25 index individuals did not reveal additional variants missed by DHPLC. The concomitant analysis of 41 index cases showed that 4 probably disease-associated mutations were identified by DHPLC while only 3 of those 4 sites were detected by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. We conclude that DHPLC is a sensitive and cost-effective method for the screening of BRCA1 and BRCA2.
Genetic linkage data have shown that alterations of the BRCA1 gene are responsible for the majority of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. BRCA1 germline mutations, however, are found less frequently than expected. Mutation detection strategies, which are generally based on the polymerase chain reaction, therefore focus on point and small gene alterations. These approaches do not allow for the detection of large gene rearrangements, which also can be involved in BRCA1 alterations. Indeed, a few of them, spread over the entire BRCA1 gene, have been detected recently by Southern blotting or transcript analysis. We have developed an alternative strategy allowing a panoramic view of the BRCA1 gene, based on dynamic molecular combing and the design of a full four-color bar code of the BRCA1 region. The strategy was tested with the study of four large BRCA1 rearrangements previously reported. In addition, when screening a series of 10 breast and ovarian cancer families negatively tested for point mutation in BRCA1/2, we found an unreported 17-kb BRCA1 duplication encompassing exons 3 to 8. The detection of rearrangements as small as 2 to 6 kb with respect to the normal size of the studied fragment is achieved when the BRCA1 region is divided into 10 fragments. In addition, as the BRCA1 bar code is a morphologic approach, the direct observation of complex and likely underreported rearrangements, such as inversions and insertions, becomes possible.
The BRCA1 Exon 13 Duplication Screening Group * Recently, a 6-kb duplication of exon 13, which creates a frameshift in the coding sequence of the BRCA1 gene, has been described in three unrelated U.S. families of European ancestry and in one Portuguese family. Here, our goal was to estimate the frequency and geographic diversity of carriers of this duplication. To do this, a collaborative screening study was set up that involved 39 institutions from 19 countries and included 3,580 unrelated individuals with a family history of the disease and 934 early-onset breast and/or ovarian cancer cases. A total of 11 additional families carrying this mutation were identified in Australia (1), Belgium (1), Canada (1), Great Britain (6), and the United States (2). Haplotyping showed that they are likely to derive from a common ancestor, possibly of northern British origin. Our results demonstrate that it is strongly advisable, for laboratories carrying out screening either in English-speaking countries or in countries with historical links with Britain, to include within their BRCA1 screening protocols the polymerase chain reaction-based assay described in this report. Methods used to screen for mutations in the BRCA1 gene (MIM 113705) focus mainly on genomic DNA, and, being PCR based, they do not enable the detection of large DNA rearrangements. This may explain why only 12 large germline insertions or deletions have been described (
Germline mutations of the PTEN gene are involved in Cowden disease, a genetic condition associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Further somatic PTEN mutations have been found in glioblastomas and to a lesser extent in meningiomas. Therefore, PTEN germline mutations were searched for in a series of 20 unrelated women with breast cancer who also had a personal or familial breast-brain tumour history. Inclusion criteria were 1. family history of breast cancer; 2. absence of germline BRCA1 and p53 mutation; and 3. at least one case of brain tumour (glioblastoma, meningioma, or medulloblastoma) in either the index case or one of their first or second degree relatives. Any stigmata of Cowden disease was an exclusion criteria. Screening of the PTEN gene for point mutations or small rearrangements were performed using the denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis method on the 9 coding exons. No disease-associated mutation of the PTEN gene has been detected in our series. It is, thus, unlikely that PTEN is a significant BRCA predisposing locus. However, one might ask whether breast cancer cases resulting from germline PTEN mutation could occur without any mammary histological feature of Cowden disease. Int. J. Cancer (Pred. Oncol.) 84:216-219, 1999. Wiley-Liss, Inc.To date, 3 major and well-established breast cancer predisposing genes, namely BRCA1, BRCA2 and p53, have been identified. Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are mostly associated with familial breast and/or ovarian, and with familial site-specific breast cancer history, respectively (Ford et al., 1998, for review), whereas p53 mutations predispose to Li-Fraumeni syndrome characterized by the occurrence of sarcoma, breast, adrenocortical, brain, and hematological tumours in children and young adults (Varley et al.,
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.