IMPORTANCECheckpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death 1 or its ligand (PD-L1) as monotherapies or in combination with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 have shown clinical activity in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.OBJECTIVE To compare durvalumab, with or without tremelimumab, with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial (MYSTIC) was conducted at 203 cancer treatment centers in 17 countries. Patients with treatment-naive, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who had no sensitizing EGFR or ALK genetic alterations were randomized to receive treatment with durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, or chemotherapy. Data were collected from July 21, 2015, to October 30, 2018.INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive treatment with durvalumab (20 mg/kg every 4 weeks), durvalumab (20 mg/kg every 4 weeks) plus tremelimumab (1 mg/kg every 4 weeks, up to 4 doses), or platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary end points, assessed in patients with Ն25% of tumor cells expressing PD-L1, were overall survival (OS) for durvalumab vs chemotherapy, and OS and progression-free survival (PFS) for durvalumab plus tremelimumab vs chemotherapy. Analysis of blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) was exploratory.

No abstract

EGFR-mutant lung cancers responsive to reversible EGFR inhibitors (gefitinib/erlotinib) develop acquired resistance, mediated by second-site EGFR T790M mutation in >50% cases. Preclinically, afatinib (irreversible ErbB family blocker) plus cetuximab (anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody) overcomes T790M-mediated resistance. This phase Ib study combining afatinib and cetuximab enrolled heavily pretreated patients with advanced EGFR-mutant lung cancer and acquired resistance to erlotinib/gefitinib. Patients provided post-acquired-resistance tumor samples for profiling EGFR mutations. Among 126 patients, objective response rate (overall 29%) was comparable in T790M-positive and T790M-negative tumors (32% vs. 25%; P = 0.341). Median progression-free survival was 4.7 months (95% confidence interval, 4.3–6.4); median duration of confirmed objective response was 5.7 months (range, 1.8–24.4). Therapy-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 44%/2% of patients. Afatinib/cetuximab demonstrated robust clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in EGFR-mutant lung cancers with acquired resistance to gefitinib or erlotinib, both with and without T790M mutations, warranting further investigation.

IMPORTANCE Current treatment options for progressive ovarian cancer provide limited benefit, particularly in patients whose disease has become resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy and safety of avelumab, an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 agent, in a cohort of patients with previously treated recurrent or refractory ovarian cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an expansion cohort of a phase 1b, open-label study (JAVELIN Solid Tumor), 125 patients with advanced ovarian cancer who had

Background: PD1 inhibitors as well as PD1/CTLA4 combinations have shown remarkable efficacy in the first-line treatment of metastatic melanoma. The impact of many concomitant medications on the clinical outcomes from PD1 based therapies remains elusive. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 140 patients included in the Checkmate 069 phase II clinical trial as a discovery cohort, comparing ipilimumab monotherapy with ipilimumab combined with nivolumab. We compared response rates, progression-free survival and overall survival of patients treated or not with 11 different classes of comedications at immune therapy initiation. Disease stage, LDH levels, BRAF status, sex, age, and body mass index were also compared. Furthermore, a protein array was performed for 440 analytes in a subset of 135 patients for whom pretreatment serum was available. We validated the impact of proton pump inhibitors in an independent cohort of 68 PD1 monotherapy (pembrolizumab or nivolumab) treated patients. Results: In univariate analysis, baseline proton pump inhibitor treatment almost halved the objective response rates, reduced progression-free and overall survival of patients treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab but not with ipilimumab alone. This effect was maintained when accounted for multiple comparisons and in a multivariate analysis. Pretreatment serum protein analysis showed increased NCAM1 and CSF3R levels in PPI users. We found increased baseline blood leukocyte and neutrophil levels in correlation with PPI use. The results were confirmed in an independent cohort of 68, first-line melanoma patients. Conclusions: Our analysis shows that proton pump inhibitors could negatively impact on the benefit from PD1 based therapies both for monotherapy and also for ipilimumab and nivolumab combination therapy. PPIs might establish a unique inflammatory immune status, prior to immune therapy initiation that interferes with treatment efficacy. These results suggest that if possible PPIs should be avoided in patients who are destined for PD1-based immunetherapies. Also, the results will have important implication for design of future clinical trials.

In this prospective phase III trial, afatinib combined with paclitaxel improved progression-free survival and objective response, compared with single-agent chemotherapy, in patients with NSCLC who were clinically enriched for ErbB dependency having failed platinum-based chemotherapy, gefitinib/erlotinib and afatinib monotherapy after initial benefit on each tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

BackgroundWe assessed the efficacy and safety of avelumab, an anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, in patients with previously treated metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma (mACC).MethodsIn this phase 1b expansion cohort, patients with mACC and prior platinum-based therapy received avelumab at 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. Continuation of mitotane was permitted; however, mitotane levels during the study were not recorded. Tumor response was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors v1.1.ResultsFifty patients received avelumab and were followed for a median of 16.5 months. Prior treatment included ≥2 lines in 74.0%; mitotane was continued in 50.0%. The objective response rate (ORR) was 6.0% (95% CI, 1.3% to 16.5%; partial response in 3 patients). Twenty-one patients (42.0%) had stable disease as best response (disease control rate, 48.0%). Median progression-free survival was 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.4 to 4.0), median overall survival (OS) was 10.6 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 15.0), and the 1-year OS rate was 43.4% (95% CI, 27.9% to 57.9%). In evaluable patients with PD-L1+ (n = 12) or PD-L1− (n = 30) tumors (≥5% tumor cell cutoff), ORR was 16.7% vs 3.3% (P = .192). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 82.0%; the most common were nausea (20.0%), fatigue (18.0%), hypothyroidism (14.0%), and pyrexia (14.0%). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 16.0%; no grade 4 to 5 TRAEs occurred. Twelve patients (24.0%) had an immune-related TRAE of any grade, which were grade 3 in 2 patients (4.0%): adrenal insufficiency (n = 1), and pneumonitis (n = 1).ConclusionsAvelumab showed clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with platinum-treated mACC.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01772004; registered January 21, 2013.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-018-0424-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Purpose: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has been shown to be predictive of survival benefit in patients with NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Measuring TMB in the blood (bTMB) using circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers practical advantages compared with TMB measurement in tumor tissue (tTMB); however, there is a need for validated assays and identification of optimal cut-offs. We describe the analytical validation of a new bTMB algorithm and its clinical utility using data from the phase III MYSTIC trial. Patients and Methods:The dataset used for the clinical validation was from MYSTIC, which evaluated first-line durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) ± tremelimumab (anti-CTLA-4) or chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC. bTMB and tTMB were evaluated using the GuardantOMNI and FoundationOne CDx assays, respectively. A Cox proportional hazards model and minimal Pvalue cross-validation approach was used to identify the optimal bTMB cut-off. Results:In MYSTIC, somatic mutations could be detected in ctDNA extracted from plasma samples in a majority of patients, allowing subsequent calculation of bTMB. The success rate for obtaining valid TMB scores was higher for bTMB (809/1001; 81%) than for tTMB (460/735; 63%). Minimal P-value cross-validation analysis confirmed the selection of bTMB ≥20 mut/Mb as the optimal cut-off for clinical benefit with durvalumab + tremelimumab. Conclusions:Our study demonstrates the feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of the GuardantOMNI ctDNA platform for quantifying bTMB from plasma samples. Using the new bTMB algorithm and an optimal bTMB cut-off of ≥20 mut/MB, high bTMB was predictive of clinical benefit with durvalumab + tremelimumab versus chemotherapy.Research.