Purpose: Widespread, quality genomics education for health professionals is required to create a competent genomic workforce. A lack of standards for reporting genomics education and evaluation limits the evidence base for replication and comparison. We therefore undertook a consensus process with the aim of developing a recommended minimum set of information to support consistent reporting of the design, development, delivery and evaluation of genomics education interventions.Methods: Draft standards were derived from the literature (25 items from 21 publications).Thirty-six international experts were purposively recruited and completed three rounds of a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on relevance, clarity, comprehensiveness, utility and design.
Results:The final standards include 18 items relating to development and delivery of genomics education interventions, 12 relating to evaluation, and one on stakeholder engagement.
Conclusion:These reporting item standards for education and evaluation of genomics (RISE2 Genomics) are intended to be widely applicable across settings and health professions. Their use by those involved in reporting genomics education interventions and evaluation, as well as their adoption by journals and policy makers as the expected standard, will support greater transparency, consistency and comprehensiveness of reporting.Consequently, the evidence base of genomics education will be more robust, enabling highquality genomics education and evaluation across a range of settings.
We assessed hospitalisations for gastrointestinal bleeding directly related to primary prevention aspirin in lower risk patients for a 6-month period in three South Australian hospitals. Those with related underlying pathology or concurrent causative medication were excluded. Identified patients (n = 22) carried little co-morbidity, 41% received prior proton-pump inhibitors and 68% were aged >70 years.
How to citeBANDIERA, Carole et al. Interventions to Support Adherence to Oral Anticancer Therapies: Research challenges, lessons learned, and strategies to overcome them from Australia and Switzerland. In:
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.