Purpose of review The aim of this article is to provide an overview of recent findings regarding the risk factors for bladder cancer. Recent findings Most of the available data derive from retrospective analysis. Smoking represents the most common and important risk factor. Occupational, dietary, and environmental exogenic carcinogen exposure, as well as several lifestyle factors, can increase the risk of developing bladder cancer. Summary Bladder cancer is a common malignancy worldwide. Cigarette smoking, exposure to aromatic amines and arsenic are known risk factors for bladder cancer. Evidence on other modifiable risk factors such as carcinogen exposure derived from the diet or environment as well as occupational hazards is still weak. Medical conditions leading to chronic inflammation, altering insulin resistance, negatively modulating the immune system and/or genetic alterations may have a role in bladder cancer carcinogenesis. Further studies are, however, necessary to identify possible exogenic risk factors, as well as their interactions, that partake in the carcinogenesis of bladder cancer.
A valid treatment option for recurrence after definite radiotherapy (RT) for localized prostate cancer (PC) is salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP). However, data on SRP are scarce, possibly resulting in an underutilization. A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE (Pubmed), Embase, and Web of Science databases including studies published between January 1980 and April 2020. Overall, 23 English language articles including a total number of 2323 patients were selected according to PRISMA criteria. The overall median follow-up was 37.5 months (IQR 35.5–52.5). Biochemical-recurrence (BCR)-free probability ranged from 34% to 83% at five years, respectively, and from 31% to 37% at 10 years. Cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) ranged from 88.7% to 98% and 64% to 95% at five years and from 72% to 83% and 65% to 72% at 10 years, respectively. Positive surgical margins ranged from 14% to 45.8% and pathologic organ-confined disease was reported from 20% to 57%. The rate of pathologic > T2-disease ranged from 37% to 80% and pN1 disease differed between 0% to 78.4%. Pre-SRP PSA, pre-SRP Gleason Score (GS), pathologic stage after SRP, and pathologic lymph node involvement seemed to be the strongest prognostic factors for good outcomes. SRP provides accurate histopathological and functional outcomes, as well as durable cancer control. Careful patient counseling in a shared decision-making process is recommended.
Purpose of review Sarcopenia is known to affect perioperative and oncologic outcomes in patients with different urological malignancies. Nevertheless, the use of pretreatment sarcopenia as a predictor of clinical outcomes in patients with prostate cancer is still poorly studied. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic review summarizing the available evidence and identifying the prognostic value of sarcopenia in prostate cancer patients. Recent findings Sarcopenia was not predictive of biochemical recurrence in patients treated with radical prostatectomy. However, it was associated with worse long-term survival outcomes as well as the likelihood of developing postoperative complications after radical prostatectomy. In the context of radiotherapy, sarcopenia was a predictive factor for overall survival. In patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation, sarcopenia was associated with overall and cancer-specific survival. In patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer, sarcopenia was associated with poorer tolerance to docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Summary Most studies found sarcopenia to be a predictor for worse perioperative and oncologic outcomes in patients treated with radical surgery, radiotherapy, or systemic therapy for prostate cancer. However, there is significant heterogeneity across the studies in terms of sarcopenia definition. For a better understanding of the prognostic value of sarcopenia in patients with prostate cancer, large-scale prospective studies are needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.