A large fraction of the organic carbon derived from land that is transported through inland waters is decomposed along river systems and emitted to the atmosphere as carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). The Amazon River outgasses nearly as much CO 2 as the rainforest sequesters on an annual basis, representing ∼25% of global CO 2 emissions from inland waters. However, current estimates of CO 2 outgassing from the Amazon basin are based on a conservative upscaling of measurements made in the central Amazon, meaning both basin and global scale budgets are likely underestimated. The lower Amazon River, from Óbidos to the river mouth, represents ∼13% of the total drainage basin area, and is not included in current basin-scale estimates. Here, we assessed the concentration and evasion rate of CO 2 along the lower Amazon River corridor and its major tributaries, the Tapajós and Xingu Rivers. Evasive CO 2 fluxes were directly measured using floating chambers and gas transfer coefficients (k 600 ) were calculated for different hydrological seasons. Temporal variations in pCO 2 and CO 2 emissions were similar to previous observations throughout the Amazon (e.g., peak concentrations at high water) and CO 2 outgassing was lower in the clearwater tributaries compared to the mainstem. However, k 600 -values were higher than previously reported upstream likely due to the generally windier conditions, turbulence caused by tidal forces, and an amplification of these factors in the wider channels with a longer fetch. We estimate that the lower Amazon River mainstem emits 0.2 Pg C year −1 within our study boundaries, or as much as 0.48 Pg C year −1 if the entire spatial extent to the geographical mouth is considered. Including these values with updated basin scale estimates and estimates of CO 2 outgassing from small streams we estimate that the Amazon running waters outgasses as much as 1.39 Pg C year −1 , increasing the global emissions from inland waters by 43% for a total of 2.9 Pg C year −1 . These results highlight a large missing gap in basin-scale carbon budgets along the complete continuum of the Amazon River, and likely most other large river systems, that could drastically alter global scale carbon budgets.
Here we present direct measurements of the biological breakdown of 13C‐labeled substrates to CO2 at seven locations along the lower Amazon River, from Óbidos to the mouth. Dark incubation experiments were performed at high and low water periods using vanillin, a lignin phenol derived from vascular plants, and at the high water period using four different 13C‐labeled plant litter leachates. Leachates derived from oak wood were degraded most slowly with vanillin monomers, macrophyte leaves, macrophyte stems, and whole grass leachates being converted to CO2 1.2, 1.3, 1.7, and 2.3 times faster, respectively, at the upstream boundary, Óbidos. Relative to Óbidos, the sum degradation rate of all four leachates was 3.3 and 2.6 times faster in the algae‐rich Tapajós and Xingu Rivers, respectively. Likewise, the leachates were broken down 3.2 times more quickly at Óbidos when algal biomass from the Tapajós River was simultaneously added. Leachate reactivity similarly increased from Óbidos to the mouth with leachates breaking down 1.7 times more quickly at Almeirim (midway to the mouth) and 2.8 times more quickly across the river mouth. There was no discernible correlation between in situ nutrient levels and remineralization rates, suggesting that priming effects were an important factor controlling reactivity along the continuum. Further, continuous measurements of CO2, O2, and conductivity along the confluence of the Tapajós and Amazon Rivers and the Xingu and Jarauçu Rivers revealed in situ evidence for enhanced O2 drawdown and CO2 production along the mixing zone of these confluences.
The transfer of carbon (C) from Amazon forests to aquatic ecosystems as CO 2 supersaturated in groundwater that outgases to the atmosphere after it reaches small streams has been postulated to be an important component of terrestrial ecosystem C budgets. We measured C losses as soil respiration and methane (CH 4 ) flux, direct CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes from the stream surface and fluvial export of dissolved inorganic C (DIC), dissolved organic C (DOC), and particulate C over an annual hydrologic cycle from a 1,319-ha forested Amazon perennial first-order headwater watershed at Tanguro Ranch in the southern Amazon state of Mato Grosso. Stream pCO 2 concentrations ranged from 6,491 to 14,976 latm and directly-measured stream CO 2 outgassing flux was 5,994 ± 677 g C m -2 y -1 of stream surface. Stream pCH 4 concentrations ranged from 291 to 438 latm and measured stream CH 4 outgassing flux was 987 ± 221 g C m -2 y -1 . Despite high flux rates from the stream surface, the small area of stream itself (970 m 2 , or 0.007% of watershed area) led to small directly-measured annual fluxes of CO 2 (0.44 ± 0.05 g C m 2 y -1 ) and CH 4 (0.07 ± 0.02 g C m 2 y -1 ) per unit watershed land area. Measured fluvial export of DIC (0.78 ± 0.04 g C m -2 y -1 ), DOC (0.16 ± 0.03 g C m -2 y -1 ) and coarse plus fine particulate C (0.001 ± 0.001 g C m -2 y -1 ) per unit watershed land area were also small. However, stream discharge accounted for only 12% of the modeled annual watershed water output because deep groundwater flows dominated total runoff from the watershed. When C in this bypassing groundwater was included, total watershed export was 10.83 g C m -2 y -1 as CO 2 outgassing, 11.29 g C m -2 y -1 as fluvial DIC and 0.64 g C m -2 y -1 as fluvial DOC. Outgassing fluxes were somewhat lower than the 40-50 g C m -2 y -1 reported from other Amazon watersheds and may result in part from lower annual rainfall at Tanguro. Total stream-associated gaseous C losses were two orders of magnitude less than soil respiration (696 ± 147 g C m -2 y -1 ), but total losses of C transported by water comprised up to about 20% of the ± 150 g C m -2 (±1.5 Mg C ha -1 ) that is exchanged annually across Amazon tropical forest canopies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.