Translation initiation is a complex process in which initiator tRNA, 40S, and 60S ribosomal subunits are assembled by eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) into an 80S ribosome at the initiation codon of mRNA. The cap-binding complex eIF4F and the factors eIF4A and eIF4B are required for binding of 43S complexes (comprising a 40S subunit, eIF2͞GTP͞Met-tRNAi and eIF3) to the 5 end of capped mRNA but are not sufficient to promote ribosomal scanning to the initiation codon. eIF1A enhances the ability of eIF1 to dissociate aberrantly assembled complexes from mRNA, and these factors synergistically mediate 48S complex assembly at the initiation codon. Joining of 48S complexes to 60S subunits to form 80S ribosomes requires eIF5B, which has an essential ribosome-dependent GTPase activity and hydrolysis of eIF2-bound GTP induced by eIF5. Initiation on a few mRNAs is cap-independent and occurs instead by internal ribosomal entry. Encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) and hepatitis C virus epitomize distinct mechanisms of internal ribosomal entry site (IRES)-mediated initiation. The eIF4A and eIF4G subunits of eIF4F bind immediately upstream of the EMCV initiation codon and promote binding of 43S complexes. EMCV initiation does not involve scanning and does not require eIF1, eIF1A, and the eIF4E subunit of eIF4F. Initiation on some EMCV-like IRESs requires additional noncanonical initiation factors, which alter IRES conformation and promote binding of eIF4A͞4G. Initiation on the hepatitis C virus IRES is even simpler: 43S complexes containing only eIF2 and eIF3 bind directly to the initiation codon as a result of specific interaction of the IRES and the 40S subunit.T ranslation of mRNA into protein begins after assembly of initiator tRNA (Met-tRNA i ), mRNA, and separated 40S and 60S ribosomal subunits into an 80S ribosome in which MettRNA i is positioned in the ribosomal P site at the initiation codon. The complex initiation process that leads to 80S ribosome formation consists of several linked stages that are mediated by eukaryotic initiation factors. These stages are:(i) Selection of initiator tRNA from the pool of elongator tRNAs by eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)2 and binding of an eIF2͞GTP͞Met-tRNA i ternary complex and other eIFs to the 40S subunit to form a 43S preinitiation complex.(ii) Binding of the 43S complex to mRNA, which in most instances occurs by a mechanism that involves initial recognition of the m 7 G cap at the mRNA 5Ј-terminus by the eIF4E (cap-binding) subunit of eIF4F. Ribosomes bind to a subset of cellular and viral mRNAs as a result of cap-and endindependent internal ribosomal entry.(iii) Movement of the mRNA-bound ribosomal complex along the 5Ј nontranslated region (5ЈNTR) from its initial binding site to the initiation codon to form a 48S initiation complex in which the initiation codon is base paired to the anticodon of initiator tRNA.(iv) Displacement of factors from the 48S complex and joining of the 60S subunit to form an 80S ribosome, leaving Met-tRNA i in the ribosomal P site.Research in ...
Translation initiation on poliovirus RNA occurs by internal binding of ribosomes to a sequence within the 5' untranslated region. We have previously characterized a HeLa cell protein, p52, that binds to a fragment of the poliovirus 5' untranslated region (K. Meerovitch, J. Pelletier, and N. Sonenberg, Genes Dev. 3:1026-1034, 1989). Here we report the purification of the HeLa p52. Protein microsequencing identified p52 as La autoantigen. The La protein is a human antigen that is recognized by antibodies from patients with autoimmune disorders such as systemic lupus erythematosus and Sjogren's syndrome. We show that the La protein stimulates translation of poliovirus RNA, but not brome mosaic virus, tobacco mosaic virus, and alfalfa mosaic virus 4 RNA, translation in a reticulocyte lysate. In addition, La corrects aberrant translation of poliovirus RNA in a reticulocyte lysate. Subcellular immunolocalization showed that La protein is mainly nuclear, but after poliovirus infection, La is redistributed to the cytoplasm. Our results suggest that La protein is involved in poliovirus internal initiation of translation and might function through a similar mechanism in the translation of cellular mRNAs.
An analysis of published nucleotide sequences of the 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) of 7 cardioviruses and 3 aphthoviruses has allowed us to derive a consensus secondary structure model that differs from that previously proposed for the 5'-UTR of entero- and rhinoviruses, though all these viruses belong to the same family, Picornaviridae. The theoretical model derived here was experimentally supported by investigating the accessibility of encephalomyocarditis virus RNA to modifications with dimethyl sulfate and its susceptibility to S1 and cobra venom nucleases. The possible involvement of the 5"-UTR secondary structure domains in the translational control is briefly discussed.
Some picornaviruses, for example, poliovirus, increase bidirectional permeability of the nuclear envelope and suppress active nucleocytoplasmic transport. These activities require the viral protease 2Apro . Here, we studied nucleocytoplasmic traffic in cells infected with encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV; a cardiovirus), which lacks the poliovirus 2A pro -related protein. EMCV similarly enhanced bidirectional nucleocytoplasmic traffic. By using the fluorescent "Timer" protein, which contains a nuclear localization signal, we showed that the cytoplasmic accumulation of nuclear proteins in infected cells was largely due to the nuclear efflux of "old" proteins rather than impaired active nuclear import of newly synthesized molecules. The nuclear envelope of digitonin-treated EMCV-infected cells permitted rapid efflux of a nuclear marker protein. Inhibitors of poliovirus 2A pro did not prevent the EMCV-induced efflux. Extracts from EMCV-infected cells and products of in vitro translation of viral RNAs contained an activity increasing permeability of the nuclear envelope of uninfected cells. This activity depended on the expression of the viral leader protein. Mutations disrupting the zinc finger motif of this protein abolished its efflux-inducing ability. Inactivation of the L protein phosphorylation site (Thr473Ala) resulted in a delayed efflux, while a phosphorylation-mimicking (Thr473Asp) replacement did not significantly impair the efflux-inducing ability. Such activity of extracts from EMCV-infected cells was suppressed by the protein kinase inhibitor staurosporine. As evidenced by electron microscopy, cardiovirus infection resulted in alteration of the nuclear pores, but it did not trigger degradation of the nucleoporins known to be degraded in the poliovirus-infected cells. Thus, two groups of picornaviruses, enteroviruses and cardioviruses, similarly alter the nucleocytoplasmic traffic but achieve this by strikingly different mechanisms.Picornaviruses, small nonenveloped icosahedral animal viruses with a single-stranded RNA genome of positive (mRNA) polarity, encompass the Enterovirus, Rhinoviruses, Cardiovirus, Aphthovirus, Parechovirus, and some other genera (64). All essential steps of their reproduction, such as translation, RNA synthesis, and encapsidation, take place in the cytoplasm of infected cells. The nonessential role of the nucleus for their reproduction follows from their ability to fulfill the complete infectious cycle in nuclei-free cytoplasts (31, 60) or cytoplasmic extracts (7,52,71). This fact, however, does not mean that the nuclei are not involved in the infectious process. Indeed, virusspecific proteins have been detected in the nuclei of poliovirusinfected (11, 29) and encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV)-infected (5, 6) cells. Poliovirus proteases 2A and 3C are known to target a variety of nuclear transcription factors and histones (66,78,79,80). The EMCV 2A protein enters the nucleoli and interacts there with a ribosome precursor, contributing thereby to alterations in the translation c...
Poliovirus and some other picornaviruses trigger relocation of certain nuclear proteins into the cytoplasm. Here, by using a protein changing its fluorescence color with time and containing a nuclear localization signal (NLS), we demonstrate that the poliovirus-triggered relocation is largely due to the exit of presynthesized nuclear protein into the cytoplasm. The leakiness of the nuclear envelope was also documented by the inability of nuclei from digitonin-permeabilized, virus-infected (but not mock-infected) cells to retain an NLS-containing derivative of green fluorescent protein (GFP). The cytoplasm-to-nucleus traffic was also facilitated during infection, as evidenced by experiments with GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase), cyclin B1, and an NLS-lacking derivative of GFP, which are predominantly cytoplasmic in uninfected cells. Electron microscopy demonstrated that a bar-like barrier structure in the channel of the nuclear pores, seen in unin- Picornaviruses (61) are cytoplasmic viruses. All essential steps of their reproduction, such as translation and replication of the viral RNA and maturation of virions, are confined to the cytoplasm. Not surprisingly, picornaviruses, such as poliovirus, echovirus, and encephalomyocarditis virus, are known to produce infectious progeny in nucleus-free cytoplasts (24, 54) or cytoplasmic extracts (5, 48, 66). This does not mean, however, that the nucleus or its components have no role in picornavirus reproduction. Indeed, the nucleus-free cytoplasts generated much less virus than did intact cells, and the former, in contrast to the latter, failed to support viral reproduction after infection with double-stranded replicative form RNA of poliovirus (14). Also, some cellular proteins known to have predominantly nuclear localization appear to relocate into the cytoplasm and to stimulate viral RNA translation (46, 37) or replication (45,71). On the other hand, the entry of virus-specific (and possibly of some cellular) cytoplasmic proteins into the nucleus of picornavirus-infected cell exerts important effects on the course of viral reproduction and the cell fate. Thus, viral proteases 2A and 3C were reported to target several transcription factors (56,73,(78)(79)(80) and histones (21). Accumulation of virus-specific proteins in the nuclei of poliovirus-infected (8, 22) and encephalomyocarditis virus-infected (3, 4) cells was directly observed. Nuclear alterations developing upon different forms of picornavirus-induced apoptosis (7,28,35,40,50,69) also require entry of certain proapoptotic host proteins (e.g., effector caspases and DNases) into the nuclei (cf., references 20 and 55).Nucleocytoplasmic protein exchange is a sophisticated, tightly regulated process ensuring accurate control of gene expression and other cellular functions (43,44,74). The nucleus is surrounded by an envelope (10, 58) consisting of the outer and inner protein-containing lipid membranes and an underlying meshwork-like proteinaceous lamina. The major gates for the nucleocytoplasmic exch...
We determined nucleotide sequences of the VP1 and 2AB genes and portions of the 2C and 3D genes of two evolving poliovirus lineages: circulating wild viruses of T geotype and Sabin vaccine-derived isolates from an immunodeficient patient. Different regions of the viral RNA were found to evolve nonsynchronously, and the rate of evolution of the 2AB region in the vaccine-derived population was not constant throughout its history. Synonymous replacements occurred not completely randomly, suggesting the need for conservation of certain rare codons (possibly to control translation elongation) and the existence of unidentified constraints in the viral RNA structure. Nevertheless the major contribution to the evolution of the two lineages came from linear accumulation of synonymous substitutions. Therefore, in agreement with current theories of viral evolution, we suggest that the majority of the mutations in both lineages were fixed as a result of successive sampling, from the heterogeneous populations, of random portions containing predominantly neutral and possibly adverse mutations. As a result of such a mode of evolution, the virus fitness may be maintained at a more or less constant level or may decrease unless more-fit variants are stochastically generated. The proposed unifying model of natural poliovirus evolution has important implications for the epidemiology of poliomyelitis.Analysis of polioviruses isolated either during a given outbreak of poliomyelitis (30,35,51) or from sequential fecal samples from infected individuals (29, 31, 34) has revealed rapid changes in the nucleotide sequence of the viral 7.5-kb RNA. Oligonucleotide fingerprinting (51) and genome sequencing (30, 34) suggested that, during the epidemic, the nucleotide substitutions ranged from 1 to 2% per year. The molecular basis of such genetic instability, common to all RNA viruses, resides in a high error rate of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases, estimated to be, for poliovirus, on the order of 10 Ϫ4 to 10 Ϫ5 substitutions per base per replication (12,70,71), and the absence of proofreading mechanisms for the correction of the errors made. The combination of these properties results in a high heterogeneity (the "quasispecies" nature) of all populations of the virus (8,10,11,63).Less understood, however, are the rules governing the fixation of specific mutations upon passages of a viral population. Generally speaking, a mutation may decrease or increase the level of virus fitness for a particular ecological niche or leave it unchanged. Nucleotide substitutions associated with changes in the "sense" of codons (nonsynonymous mutations) are less likely to be neutral than substitutions resulting in no change of the codon meaning (synonymous mutations). Fixation of mutations conferring a selective advantage is readily understood in the framework of positive Darwinian selection. Adverse mutations may be eliminated by negative selection.The likelihood of fixation of a mutation depends not only on the associated changes in virus fitness but, ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.