ABSTRACT(Ϫ)-(1R,2R)-3-(3-Dimethylamino-1-ethyl-2-methyl-propyl)-phenol hydrochloride (tapentadol HCl) is a novel -opioid receptor (MOR) agonist (K i ϭ 0.1 M; relative efficacy compared with morphine 88% in a [35 S]guanosine 5Ј-3-O-(thio)triphosphate binding assay) and NE reuptake inhibitor (K i ϭ 0.5 M for synaptosomal reuptake inhibition). In vivo intracerebral microdialysis showed that tapentadol, in contrast to morphine, produces large increases in extracellular levels of NE (ϩ450% at 10 mg/kg i.p.). Tapentadol exhibited analgesic effects in a wide range of animal models of acute and chronic pain [hot plate, tail-flick, writhing, Randall-Selitto, mustard oil colitis, chronic constriction injury (CCI), and spinal nerve ligation (SNL)], with ED 50 values ranging from 8.2 to 13 mg/kg after i.p. administration in rats. Despite a 50-fold lower binding affinity to MOR, the analgesic potency of tapentadol was only two to three times lower than that of morphine, suggesting that the dual mode of action of tapentadol may result in an opiate-sparing effect. A role of NE in the analgesic efficacy of tapentadol was directly demonstrated in the SNL model, where the analgesic effect of tapentadol was strongly reduced by the ␣ 2 -adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine but only moderately attenuated by the MOR antagonist naloxone, whereas the opposite was seen for morphine. Tolerance development to the analgesic effect of tapentadol in the CCI model was twice as slow as that of morphine. It is suggested that the broad analgesic profile of tapentadol and its relative resistance to tolerance development may be due to a dual mode of action consisting of both MOR activation and NE reuptake inhibition.

Cebranopadol (trans-6'-fluoro-4',9'-dihydro-N,N-dimethyl-4-phenyl-spiro[cyclohexane-1,1'(3'H)-pyrano[3,4-b]indol]-4-amine) is a novel analgesic nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) and opioid receptor agonist [Ki (nM)/EC50 (nM)/relative efficacy (%): human NOP receptor 0.9/13.0/89; human mu-opioid peptide (MOP) receptor 0.7/1.2/104; human kappa-opioid peptide receptor 2.6/17/67; human delta-opioid peptide receptor 18/110/105]. Cebranopadol exhibits highly potent and efficacious antinociceptive and antihypersensitive effects in several rat models of acute and chronic pain (tail-flick, rheumatoid arthritis, bone cancer, spinal nerve ligation, diabetic neuropathy) with ED50 values of 0.5-5.6 µg/kg after intravenous and 25.1 µg/kg after oral administration. In comparison with selective MOP receptor agonists, cebranopadol was more potent in models of chronic neuropathic than acute nociceptive pain. Cebranopadol's duration of action is long (up to 7 hours after intravenous 12 µg/kg; >9 hours after oral 55 µg/kg in the rat tail-flick test). The antihypersensitive activity of cebranopadol in the spinal nerve ligation model was partially reversed by pretreatment with the selective NOP receptor antagonist J-113397[1-[(3R,4R)-1-cyclooctylmethyl-3-hydroxymethyl-4-piperidyl]-3-ethyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazol-2-one] or the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone, indicating that both NOP and opioid receptor agonism are involved in this activity. Development of analgesic tolerance in the chronic constriction injury model was clearly delayed compared with that from an equianalgesic dose of morphine (complete tolerance on day 26 versus day 11, respectively). Unlike morphine, cebranopadol did not disrupt motor coordination and respiration at doses within and exceeding the analgesic dose range. Cebranopadol, by its combination of agonism at NOP and opioid receptors, affords highly potent and efficacious analgesia in various pain models with a favorable side effect profile.

The novel centrally acting analgesic tapentadol [(Ϫ)-(1R,2R)-3-(3-dimethylamino-1-ethyl-2-methyl-propyl)-phenol hydrochloride] combines two mechanisms of action, -opioid receptor (MOR) agonism and noradrenaline reuptake inhibition (NRI), in a single molecule. Pharmacological antagonism studies have demonstrated that both mechanisms of action contribute to the analgesic effects of tapentadol. This study was designed to investigate the nature of the interaction of the two mechanisms. Dose-response curves were generated in rats for tapentadol alone or in combination with the opioid antagonist naloxone or the ␣ 2 -adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine. Two different pain models were used: 1) low-intensity tail-flick and 2) spinal nerve ligation. In each model, we obtained dose-effect relations to reveal the effect of tapentadol based on MOR agonism, NRI, and unblocked tapentadol. Receptor fractional occupation was determined from tapentadol's brain concentration and its dissociation constant for each binding site. Tapentadol produced dose-dependent analgesic effects in both pain models, and its dose-effect curves were shifted to the right by both antagonists, thereby providing data to distinguish between MOR agonism and NRI. Both isobolographic analysis of occupationeffect data and a theoretically equivalent methodology determining interactions from the effect scale demonstrated very pronounced synergistic interaction between the two mechanisms of action of tapentadol. This may explain why tapentadol is only 2-to 3-fold less potent than morphine across a variety of preclinical pain models despite its 50-fold lower affinity for the MOR. This is probably the first demonstration of a synergistic interaction between the occupied receptors for a single compound with two mechanisms of action.

No abstract

The novel analgesic tapentadol combines mu-opioid receptor agonism and noradrenaline reuptake inhibition in a single molecule and shows potent analgesia in various rodent models of pain. We analyzed the contribution of opioid and monoaminergic mechanisms to the activity of tapentadol in rat models of nociceptive and neuropathic pain. Antinociceptive efficacy was inferred from tail withdrawal latencies of experimentally naive rats using a tail flick test. Antihypersensitive efficacy was inferred from ipsilateral paw withdrawal thresholds toward an electronic von Frey filament in a spinal nerve ligation model of mononeuropathic pain. Dose-response curves of tapentadol (intravenous) were determined in combination with vehicle or a fixed dose (intraperitoneal) of the mu-opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (1mg/kg), the alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine (2.15 mg/kg), or the serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist ritanserin (0.316 mg/kg). Tapentadol showed clear antinociceptive and antihypersensitive effects (>90% efficacy) with median effective dose (ED(50)) values of 3.3 and 1.9 mg/kg, respectively. While the antinociceptive ED(50) value of tapentadol was shifted to the right 6.4-fold by naloxone (21.2mg/kg) and only 1.7-fold by yohimbine (5.6 mg/kg), the antihypersensitive ED(50) value was shifted to the right 4.7-fold by yohimbine (8.9 mg/kg) and only 2.7-fold by naloxone (5.2mg/kg). Ritanserin did not affect antinociceptive or antihypersensitive ED(50) values of tapentadol. Activation of both mu-opioid receptors and alpha2-adrenoceptors contribute to the analgesic effects of tapentadol. The relative contribution is, however, dependent on the particular pain indication, as mu-opioid receptor agonism predominantly mediates tapentadol's antinociceptive effects, whereas noradrenaline reuptake inhibition predominantly mediates its antihypersensitive effects.