Key Points• Defibrotide improves day 1100 survival and CR in patients with VOD and MOF compared with a historical control.• The historical control selection methodology offers a novel approach for investigation of a life-threatening orphan disease.Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), also called sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), is a potentially life-threatening complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Untreated hepatic VOD/SOS with multi-organ failure (MOF) is associated with >80% mortality. Defibrotide has shown promising efficacy treating hepatic VOD/SOS with MOF in phase 2 studies. This phase 3 study investigated safety and efficacy of defibrotide in patients with established hepatic VOD/SOS and advanced MOF. Patients (n 5 102) given defibrotide 25 mg/kg per day were compared with 32 historical controls identified out of 6867 medical charts of HSCT patients by blinded independent reviewers. Baseline characteristics between groups were well balanced. The primary endpoint was survival at day 1100 post-HSCT; observed rates equaled 38.2% in the defibrotide group and 25% in the controls (23% estimated difference; 95.1% confidence interval [CI], 5.2-40.8; P 5 .0109, using a propensityadjusted analysis). Observed day 1100 complete response (CR) rates equaled 25.5% for defibrotide and 12.5% for controls (19% difference using similar methodology; 95.1% CI, 3.5-34.6; P 5 .0160). Defibrotide was generally well tolerated with manageable toxicity. Related adverse events (AEs) included hemorrhage or hypotension; incidence of common hemorrhagic AEs (including pulmonary alveolar [11.8% and 15.6%] and gastrointestinal bleeding [7.8% and 9.4%]) was similar between the defibrotide and control groups, respectively. Defibrotide was associated with significant improvement in day 1100 survival and CR rate. The historical-control methodology offers a novel, meaningful approach for phase 3 evaluation of orphan diseases associated with high mortality. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as

No abstract

Uncontrolled delayed nausea and vomiting remains a problem after high-dose preparative regimens used for autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants. Recently, aprepitant was approved for highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, and, in particular, is effective for decreasing delayed emesis. To evaluate its safety and efficacy in the transplantation setting, we performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of aprepitant in combination with ondansetron and dexamethasone in patients treated with ablative preparative regimens. Patients were randomized to receive oral aprepitant or placebo daily with oral ondansetron and dexamethasone during and for 3 days after the completion of the preparative regimen in this prospective randomized, double-blind study. The primary objective was complete response (CR) rate, defined as no emesis with no or mild nausea. Other endpoints included number of emetic episodes, nausea severity assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), the need for rescue antiemetics, and transplantation outcome, including regimen-related toxicity. One hundred eighty-one patients were randomized and 179 patients were eligible for analysis. Overall, CR rates were 81.9% for the aprepitant and 65.8% for the placebo arms (P < .001). Percentages of patients with no emesis all days were 73.3% for aprepitant and 22.5% placebo (P < .001). Mean VAS scores were 16.6 mm aprepitant and 16.9 mm placebo (NS), and there were no differences in the amount of rescue antiemetics used, regimen related toxicity, engraftment, or transplantation outcome. Aprepitant in combination with dexamethasone and ondansetron significantly decreased emesis and significant nausea, whereas not increasing RRT or affecting short-term survival but had no significant impact on the use of PRN antiemetics, or overall VAS nausea scores.

No abstract

SummaryBoth single and tandem cycles of high dose therapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have been shown to improve survival in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We report outcomes in 104 MM patients undergoing a single transplant after conditioning with a conventional myeloablative regimen, busulphan and cyclophosphamide. The patients were either in a first (71%), or subsequent remission (29%). Peripheral blood stem cells were mobilized using cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony stimulating factor. The conditioning regimen consisted of busulphan 0AE85 mg/kg given orally every 6 h (16 doses) and cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg/d given intravenously for 2 d. The entire conditioning, transplant and post-transplant course were in the outpatient setting for 45% patients. At a median follow-up of 26 months (range 2-98 months), the median overall and progression-free survival were 57 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 47-68] and 26 months (95% CI 20-32) respectively. Younger age and higher CD34 + cell dose infused were independently predictive of improved overall and progression-free survival. Busulphan and cyclophosphamide is an effective and well-tolerated preparative regimen for ASCT that can be given to MM patients in the outpatient setting.