RNA and protein components of the spliceosome work together to identify the 5΄ splice site, the 3΄ splice site, and the branchsite (BS) of nascent pre-mRNA. SF3b1 plays a key role in recruiting the U2 snRNP to the BS. Mutations in human SF3b1 have been linked to many diseases such as myelodysplasia (MDS) and cancer. We have used SF3b1 mutations associated with MDS to interrogate the role of the yeast ortholog, Hsh155, in BS selection and splicing. These alleles change how the spliceosome recognizes the BS and alter splicing when nonconsensus nucleotides are present at the −2, −1 and +1 positions relative to the branchpoint adenosine. This indicates that changes in BS usage observed in humans with SF3b1 mutations may result from perturbation of a conserved mechanism of BS recognition. Notably, different HSH155 alleles elicit disparate effects on splicing: some increase the fidelity of BS selection while others decrease fidelity. Our data support a model wherein conformational changes in SF3b1 promote U2 association with the BS independently of the action of the DEAD-box ATPase Prp5. We propose that SF3b1 functions to stabilize weak U2/BS duplexes to drive spliceosome assembly and splicing.
U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) biogenesis is essential for spliceosome assembly, but not well understood. Here, we report structures of the U6 RNA processing enzyme Usb1 from yeast and a substrate analog bound complex from humans. Unlike the human ortholog, we show that yeast Usb1 has cyclic phosphodiesterase activity that leaves a terminal 3′ phosphate which prevents overprocessing. Usb1 processing of U6 RNA dramatically alters its affinity for cognate RNA-binding proteins. We reconstitute the post-transcriptional assembly of yeast U6 snRNP in vitro, which occurs through a complex series of handoffs involving 10 proteins (Lhp1, Prp24, Usb1 and Lsm2–8) and anti-cooperative interactions between Prp24 and Lhp1. We propose a model for U6 snRNP assembly that explains how evolutionarily divergent and seemingly antagonistic proteins cooperate to protect and chaperone the nascent snRNA during its journey to the spliceosome.
SF3b1 is an essential component of the U2 snRNP implicated in branch site (BS) recognition and found to be frequently mutated in several human cancers. While recent structures of yeast and human SF3b1 have revealed its molecular architecture, the importance of specific RNA:protein contacts and conformational changes remains largely uncharacterized. Here, we performed mutational analysis of yeast SF3b1, guided by recent structures of the spliceosome. We find that conserved amino acids contacting the U2 snRNA backbone of the U2/BS duplex are nonessential, and that yeast can tolerate truncation of the HEAT repeats containing these amino acids. The pocket housing the branchpoint adenosine (BP-A) is also amenable to mutation despite strong conservation. However, mutations that support viability can still lead to defects in splicing pre-mRNAs with nonconsensus BS substitutions found at -3, -2, -1, and +1 positions relative to the BP-A or at the branchpoint position. Through the generation of yeast and human chimeric proteins, we further defined the functionally conserved regions of Hsh155 as well as identify changes in BS usage resulting from inclusion of human SF3b1 HEAT repeats. Moreover, these chimeric proteins confer a sensitivity to small molecule inhibition by pladienolide B to yeast splicing. Together, these data reveal the importance of individual contacts of Hsh155/SF3b1 to the U2/BS duplex and define their contribution to BS usage by the spliceosome.
Highlights d Mutation of Hsh155 enables chemical inhibition of pre-mRNA splicing in living yeast d Only a single point mutation in Hsh155 is required for inhibition in cells d Mutations in Hsh155 can synergize with one another to enhance inhibitor sensitivity d Mutations that enable inhibition increase splicing of introns with weak branch sites
Glycosylation of decan‐1‐ol (2), (±)‐decan‐2‐ol (3), and (±)‐methyl 3‐hydroxydecanoate (4) with L‐rhamnose peracetate 5 to produce rhamnosides (=6‐deoxymannosides) 6, 7, and 8 in the presence of Lewis acids BF3⋅Et2O, Sc(OTf)3, InBr3, and Bi(OTf)3 was studied (Table 1). While the strong Lewis acids BF3⋅Et2O and Sc(OTf)3 were effective as glycosylation promoters, they had to be used in excess; however, glycosylation required careful control of reaction times and temperatures, and these Lewis acids produced impurities in addition to the desired glycosides. Enantiomerically pure rhamnosides (R)‐1 and (S)‐1 (Fig.) were obtained from L‐rhamnose peracetate 5 and (±)‐benzyl 3‐hydroxydecanoate (9) via the diastereoisomeric rhamnosides 10 (Table 2; Scheme 3). The much weaker Lewis acids InBr3 and Bi(OTfl)3 produced purer products in high yield under a wider range of conditions (higher temperatures), and were effective glycosylation promoters even when used catalytically (<10% catalyst; Table 2). We refer to these Lewis acids as ‘minimally competent Lewis acids’ (cf. Scheme 4).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.