ObjectiveTo evaluate sintilimab versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy (cisplatin plus paclitaxel or cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil) as first line treatment of unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.DesignMulticentre, randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial.Setting66 sites in China and 13 sites outside of China between 14 December 2018 and 9 April 2021.Participants659 adults (aged ≥18 years) with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who had not received systemic treatment.InterventionParticipants were randomised 1:1 to receive sintilimab or placebo (3 mg/kg in patients weighing <60 kg or 200 mg in patients weighing ≥60 kg) in combination with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every three weeks. The trial was amended to allow investigators to choose the chemotherapy regimen: cisplatin plus paclitaxel or cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m2 continuous infusion on days 1-5).Main outcome measuresOverall survival in all patients and in patients with combined positive scores of ≥10 for expression of programmed cell death ligand 1.Results659 patients were randomly assigned to sintilimab (n=327) or placebo (n=332) with chemotherapy. 616 of 659 patients (93%) received sintilimab or placebo in combination with cisplatin plus paclitaxel and 43 of 659 patients (7%) received sintilimab or placebo in combination with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil. At the interim analysis, sintilimab with chemotherapy showed better overall survival compared with placebo and chemotherapy in all patients (median 16.7 v 12.5 months, hazard ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.78, P<0.001) and in patients with combined positive scores of ≥10 (17.2 v 13.6 months, 0.64, 0.48 to 0.85, P=0.002). Sintilimab and chemotherapy significantly improved progression free survival compared with placebo and chemotherapy in all patients (7.2 v 5.7 months, 0.56, 0.46 to 0.68, P<0.001) and in patients with combined positive scores of ≥10 (8.3 v 6.4 months, 0.58, 0.45 to 0.75, P<0.001). Adverse events related to treatment occurred in 321 of 327 patients (98%) in the sintilimab-chemotherapy group versus 326 of 332 (98%) patients in the placebo-chemotherapy group. Rates of adverse events related to treatment, grade ≥3, were 60% (196/327) and 55% (181/332) in the sintilimab-chemotherapy and placebo-chemotherapy groups, respectively.ConclusionsCompared with placebo, sintilimab in combination with cisplatin plus paclitaxel showed significant benefits in overall survival and progression free survival as first line treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Similar benefits of sintilimab with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil seem promising.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03748134.

This randomized, open-label, multi-center phase 2 study (NCT03116152) assessed sintilimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, versus chemotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after first-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), while exploratory endpoint was the association of biomarkers with efficacy. The median OS in the sintilimab group was significantly improved compared with the chemotherapy group (median OS 7.2 vs.6.2 months; P = 0.032; HR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50–0.97). Incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3–5 was lower with sintilimab than with chemotherapy (20.2 vs. 39.1%). Patients with high T-cell receptor (TCR) clonality and low molecular tumor burden index (mTBI) showed the longest median OS (15.0 months). Patients with NLR < 3 at 6 weeks post-treatment had a significantly prolonged median OS (16.6 months) compared with NLR ≥ 3. The results demonstrate a significant improvement in OS of sintilimab compared to chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic ESCC.

4511 Background: Patients (pts) with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) refractory to first-line chemotherapy have limited treatment options. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, versus chemotherapy in these pts, and explore predictive value of PD-L1 and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on efficacy of sintilimab. Methods: The open-label, multi-center phase 2 trial (NCT03116152) enrolled advanced ESCC pts refractory to first-line chemotherapy, and randomly assigned (1:1) them to receive sintilimab (200mg, Q3W) or chemotherapy (paclitaxel, 175mg/m2, Q3W; or irinotecan, 180mg/m2, Q2W), intravenously. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Explorative endpoint were effects of PD-L1 and NLR on efficacy of sintilimab. Results: From May 16, 2017 to Aug 30, 2018, 190 pts were randomly assigned to sintilimab or chemotherapy (n = 95 per group). With the median follow-up of 7.2 months for sintilimab group and 6.2 months for chemotherapy group, the median OS in sintilimab was significantly higher than chemotherapy (7.2m vs. 6.2m, hazard ratio [HR] 0.70, P = 0.034). The objective response rate (ORR) was greater in sintilimab than chemotherapy with 12.6% vs. 6.3%, and the median duration of response was longer (8.3m vs. 6.2m). Incidences of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade (54.3% vs. 90.8%) and of grade 3-5 (20.2% vs. 39.1%) were both numerically less in sintilimab than in chemotherapy. The ORR in sintilimab versus chemotherapy in pts with tumor PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥1% and with TPS ≥10% were 20.2% vs. 0%, and 35.7% vs. 0%, respectively. In sintilimab group, pts with low NLR ( < 3) had a significant longer median OS (HR 0.54, P = 0.019) than with high NLR. Conclusions: Sintilimab was superior to chemotherapy with a significantly prolonged survival benefit and a favorable safety profile in pts with advanced ESCC refractory to first-line chemotherapy. High tumor PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥1% or ≥10%) might indicate more response benefit to sintilimab for these pts, and low NLR might be a positive predictive factor for sintilimab. Clinical trial information: NCT03116152 .

BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of rituximab-based chemotherapy (R-chemo), the standard regimen for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), which is more common in Asia than in Western countries, are well confirmed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, the safety and effectiveness of R-chemo in patients who are largely excluded from RCTs have not been well characterized. This real-world study investigated the safety and effectiveness of R-chemo as first-line treatment in Chinese patients with DLBCL.MethodsTreatment-naive DLBCL patients who were CD20 positive and eligible to receive R-chemo were enrolled with no specific exclusion criteria. Data collected at baseline included age, gender, disease stage, international prognostic index (IPI), B symptoms, extranodal involvement, performance status, and medical history. In the present study, data on safety, treatment effectiveness, and HBV infection management were collected 120 days after the last R-chemo administration.ResultsOverall, R-chemo was well tolerated. The safety profile of R-chemo in patients with a history of heart or liver disease was well described without any additional unexpected safety concerns. The overall response rate (ORR) in the Chinese patients from this study was 94.2 % (complete response [CR], 55.0 %; CR unconfirmed [CRu] 18.2 %; and partial response [PR], 20.9 %). Compared to patients with no history of disease, the CR and PR rates of patients with a history of heart or liver disease were lower and higher, respectively; this tendency could be in part explained by treatment interruptions in patients with heart or liver diseases. HBsAg positivity and a maximum tumor diameter of ≥7.5 cm negatively correlated with CR + CRu, whereas age and HBsAg positivity negatively correlated with CR.ConclusionsThis study further validated the safety and effectiveness of R-chemo in Chinese patients with DLBCL. Patients with a history of heart or liver disease may further benefit from R-chemo if preventive measures are taken to reduce hepatic and cardiovascular toxicity. In addition to IPI and tumor diameter, HBsAg positivity could also be a poor prognostic factor for CR in Chinese patients with DLBCL.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01340443, April 20, 2011.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2523-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Objective. We aim to investigate the correlation between FCGR2A mRNA level and prognosis of head and neck squamous cancer (HNSC) in public databases. In addition, we investigated the correlation between FCGR2A expression and clinicopathological characteristics and tumor-infiltrating immune cells in HNSC patients. Methods. FCGR2A mRNA expression in multiple cancers was analyzed based on Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis. A protein-protein interaction network was obtained based on the STRING database. The 10 proteins most closely related to FCGR2A (i.e., CD3G, PLCG2, LAT, LYN, SYK, FCGR3A, PIK3R1, HCK, ITGAM, and ITGB2) were screened, followed by establishing the protein-protein interaction network. The correlation between FCGR2A expression and immunocytes was investigated, together with the effects of FCGR2A on the metastasis, recurrence, and survival of HNSC. Results. FCGR2A expression in several carcinoma tissues was significantly higher than that of adjacent tissues. Significant differences were noticed in the HNSC samples and the adjacent tissue samples except the seven samples of grade 4. There were statistical differences between the FCGR2A expression in tissues of grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 ( P < 0.05 ). In the tissues of grade 4, the expression of FCGR2A was the lowest. The FCGR2A protein was a type of II-a receptor in γFc of the low-affinity immunoglobulin, which could bind with the Fc region of the immunoglobulin γ. There was a correlation between the FCGR2A gene and the distal HNSC metastasis. FCGR2A gene expression was correlated with the survival and prognosis. The GSE65858 dataset was selected for the validation. The FCGR2A expression was significantly correlated with total survival ( P = 0.0107 ) and progression-free survival ( P = 0.0362 ). Conclusions. Our findings shed light on the importance of FCGR2A in HNSC and illustrated a potential relationship between FCGR2A and tumor-immune interactions.