The EPIRET3 system can be successfully implanted and explanted in patients with blindness and RP. The surgical steps are feasible, and the postoperative follow-up disclosed an acceptable range of adverse events.
PurposeTo evaluate the technique, safety, and efficacy of the retropupillary implantation of iris-claw intraocular lenses in a long-term follow-up study.Patients and methodsThis retrospective study included 31 eyes of 31 patients who underwent an Artisan aphakic intraocular lens implantation between January 2006 and February 2011 at the University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany and at the Zentrum für Augenheilkunde PD Dr Laube, Düsseldorf, Germany. Preoperative data collected included demographics, etiology of aphakia, previous surgeries, preoperative eye pathology, intraocular pressure, clinical signs of endothelial cell loss, and best corrected visual acuity. Operative data and postoperative outcomes included the best corrected visual acuity, lens position, intraocular pressure, pigment dispersion, clinical signs of endothelial cell loss, development of macular edema, and other complications.ResultsThirty-one patients were included. The mean follow-up was 25.2 months (range: 4–48 months). The mean best corrected visual acuity postoperatively was 0.64 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and varied from 0 logMAR to 3 logMAR. Some patients had a low visual acuity preoperatively because of preoperative eye pathologies. In 22 patients the visual acuity improved, in two patients the visual acuity remained unchanged, and seven patients showed a decreased visual acuity. Complications were peaked pupils (n=10) and retinal detachment in one case. Four patients showed an iris atrophy and high intraocular pressure was observed only in one patient. Subluxation of the intraocular lens, endothelial cell loss, and macular edema were not observed.ConclusionThe presented long-term results demonstrate that retropupillary iris-claw lens implantation is a safe and effective method for the correction of aphakia in patients without capsule support. This surgical procedure has the advantages of a posterior chamber implantation with a low intraoperative and postoperative risk profile.
.
Purpose: To determine the threshold charges needed for eliciting visual perceptions through acute electrical stimulation of the human retina in patients suffering from retinitis pigmentosa, using an epiretinal microelectrode array.
Methods: In a multicentre study, 20 patients (average age 55 years) with visual acuities ranging from 4/200 to no light perception were included. The stimulation procedure was performed during a pars plana vitrectomy, for a maximum of 45 min, by using a microcontact film with IrOx electrodes connected by cable to a current generator. After repeated stimulation and threshold charge determination, the microelectrode array was removed.
Results: Nineteen of 20 patients stated in the postoperative interviews that they experienced one or more visual perceptions with close time correlation to single stimulation events. Minimum threshold charges needed to generate visual perceptions could be measured and verified in 15 patients. The charge level ranged from 20 to 768 nC with single or multiple electrodes. One patient suffered a retinal detachment during the procedure; this patient’s retina was successfully reattached. There were no further adverse reactions observed during the 3‐month follow‐up.
Conclusion: Acute epiretinal stimulation of the human retina, using a microelectrode array, can elicit visual perceptions in blind patients with retinitis pigmentosa.
The absorption characteristics of some UV and blue-light-filtering IOLs resembled those of the crystalline lens, but some differed. Long-term clinical trials should be performed to determine how blue-blocking IOLs affect the risk for progression of age-related macular degeneration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.