Aim/hypothesis Hyperglucagonaemia is a characteristic of several clinical conditions (e.g. end-stage renal disease (ESRD), type 2 diabetes, obesity before and after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and vagotomy with pyloroplasty), but the molecular nature of 'immunoreactive' glucagon is poorly characterised. The specific determination of fully processed, intact glucagon requires a 'sandwich' assay employing a combination of antibodies directed against both N-and C-termini. We compared a novel assay for intact glucagon with a highly sensitive C-terminal RIA (hitherto considered specific) to determine the extent to which the hyperglucagonaemia measured in clinical samples was caused by authentic glucagon. Methods We examined the performance of three commercial glucagon 'sandwich' ELISAs. The ELISA with the best overall performance was selected to compare glucagon measurements in clinical samples with an established glucagon RIA. ResultsThe first assay performed poorly: there was high cross-reactivity with glicentin (22%) and a lack of sensitivity for glucagon. The second and third assays showed minor cross-reactivity (1-5%) with oxyntomodulin and glicentin; however, the second assay had insufficient sensitivity for glucagon in plasma (>10-20 pmol/l). Thus, only the third assay was suitable for measuring glucagon concentrations in clinical samples. The ELISA and RIA measured similar glucagon levels in healthy individuals. Measurements of samples from individuals with abnormally high (type 2 diabetes or obese) or very elevated (post vagotomy with pyloroplasty, post-RYGB) glucagon levels were also similar in both assays. However, glucagon levels in participants with ESRD were much lower when measured by ELISA than by RIA, indicating that the apparent hyperglucagonaemia is not caused by fully processed intact glucagon.

Background: We assessed the effect of once-weekly semaglutide and once-daily liraglutide on kidney outcomes in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: Pooled (N=12,637) and by-trial data from SUSTAIN 6 (N=3297) and LEADER (N=9340) were assessed for albuminuria change, annual slope of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) change, and time to persistent eGFR reduction (30%, 40%, 50%, and 57%) from baseline. Results: The median follow-up durations were 2.1 and 3.8 years for SUSTAIN 6 and LEADER, respectively. In the pooled analysis, semaglutide/liraglutide lowered albuminuria from baseline to 2 years post-randomization by 24% versus placebo (95% confidence interval [CI] [20%,27% ], p <0.001). Significant reductions were also observed in by-trial data analyses ( p <0.001 for all), the largest being with semaglutide 1.0 mg: 33% (95% CI [24%,40% ], p <0.001) at 2 years. With semaglutide 1.0 mg and liraglutide, eGFR slope decline was significantly slowed by 0.87 and 0.26 mL/min/1.73 m 2 /year ( p <0.0001 and p <0.001), respectively, versus placebo. Effects appeared larger in those with baseline eGFR <60 versus ≥60 mL/min/1.73m 2 ( p interaction =0.06 and 0.008 for semaglutide 1.0 mg and liraglutide, respectively). Semaglutide/liraglutide significantly lowered risk of persistent 40% and 50% eGFR reductions versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% CI [0.75,0.99], p =0.039, and HR 0.80, 95% CI [0.66,0.97], p =0.023, respectively). Similar, non-significant, directional results were observed for 30% and 57% eGFR reductions (HR 0.92, 95% CI [0.84, 1.02], p =0.10, and HR 0.89, 95% CI [0.69, 1.13], p =0.34). In those with baseline eGFR 30−<60mL/min/1.73m 2 , the likelihood of persistent reduction for all thresholds was increased, ranging from a HR 0.71 for 30% reduction (95% CI [0.59,0.85], p =0.0003, pinteraction=0.017) to 0.54 for 57% reduction (95% CI [0.36,0.81], p =0.003, pinteraction=0.035). Conclusions: In patients with T2D, semaglutide/liraglutide offered kidney-protective effects, which appeared more pronounced in those with pre-existing chronic kidney disease.

Kidney failure is an important outcome for patients, clinicians, researchers, healthcare systems, payers, and regulators. However, no harmonized international consensus definitions of kidney failure and key surrogates of progression to kidney failure exist specifically for clinical trials. The International Society of Nephrology convened an international multistakeholder meeting to develop consensus on this topic. A core group, experienced in design, conduct, and outcome adjudication of clinical trials, developed a database of 64 randomized trials and the 163 included definitions relevant to kidney failure. Using an iterative process, a set of proposed consensus definitions were developed and subsequently vetted by the larger multi-stakeholder group of 83 participants representing 18 different countries. The

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.