Introduction

Introduction Interruptions in treatment pose risks for people with HIV (PWH) and threaten progress in ending the HIV epidemic; however, the COVID‐19 pandemic's impact on HIV service delivery across diverse settings is not broadly documented. Methods From September 2020 to March 2021, the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) research consortium surveyed 238 HIV care sites across seven geographic regions to document constraints in HIV service delivery during the first year of the pandemic and strategies for ensuring care continuity for PWH. Descriptive statistics were stratified by national HIV prevalence (<1%, 1–4.9% and ≥5%) and country income levels. Results Questions about pandemic‐related consequences for HIV care were completed by 225 (95%) sites in 42 countries with low ( n = 82), medium ( n = 86) and high ( n = 57) HIV prevalence, including low‐ ( n = 57), lower‐middle ( n = 79), upper‐middle ( n = 39) and high‐ ( n = 50) income countries. Most sites reported being subject to pandemic‐related restrictions on travel, service provision or other operations (75%), and experiencing negative impacts (76%) on clinic operations, including decreased hours/days, reduced provider availability, clinic reconfiguration for COVID‐19 services, record‐keeping interruptions and suspension of partner support. Almost all sites in low‐prevalence and high‐income countries reported increased use of telemedicine (85% and 100%, respectively), compared with less than half of sites in high‐prevalence and lower‐income settings. Few sites in high‐prevalence settings (2%) reported suspending antiretroviral therapy (ART) clinic services, and many reported adopting mitigation strategies to support adherence, including multi‐month dispensing of ART (95%) and designating community ART pick‐up points (44%). While few sites (5%) reported stockouts of first‐line ART regimens, 10–11% reported stockouts of second‐ and third‐line regimens, respectively, primarily in high‐prevalence and lower‐income settings. Interruptions in HIV viral load (VL) testing included suspension of testing (22%), longer turnaround times (41%) and supply/reagent stockouts (22%), but did not differ across settings. Conclusions While many sites in high HIV prevalence settings and lower‐income countries reported introducing or expanding measures to support treatment adherence and continuity of care, the COVID‐19 pandemic resulted in disruptions to VL testing and ART supply chains that may negatively affect the quality of HIV care in these settings.

Background: Failure to retain HIV-positive pregnant women on antiretroviral therapy (ART) leads to increased mortality for the mother and her child. This study evaluated different retention measures for women's engagement along the continuum of care for prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) option B+ services in Mozambique. Methods: We compared 'point' retention (patient's presence in care 12-month post-ART initiation or any time thereafter) with the following definitions: alive and in care 12 month post-ART initiation (Ministry of Health; MOH); attendance at a health facility up to 15-month post-ART initiation (World Health Organization; WHO); alive and in treatment at 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month post-ART initiation (Inter-Agency Task Team; IATT); and alive and in care 12-month post-ART initiation with ≥75% appointment adherence during follow-up (i.e. 'appointment adherence' retention) or with ≥75% of appointments met on time during follow-up (i.e. 'on-time adherence' retention). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were produced to assess variability in retention rates. We used 'on-time adherence' retention as our reference to estimate sensitivity, specificity, and proportion of misclassified patients.

objective To evaluate the effectiveness of the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) Option B+ programme in two provinces with high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) burden in Mozambique over the first four years of programme implementation.methods We assessed the PMTCT cascade in antenatal care (ANC) from July 2013 to December 2017 using facility-level data and performed a retrospective cohort analysis with patient-level data. We compared the 12-month antiretroviral therapy (ART) retention rates between women with HIV infection who initiated ART under Option B+ ('B+ pregnant') and those who initiated ART for their own health ('own health').results A total of 916 280 pregnant women enrolled in ANC. The proportion of women with a documented HIV status increased from 93% in 2013 to 96% in 2017. The proportion of those tested HIV-positive decreased from 8% to 6% while that of those HIV-positive on ART increased from 42% to 95%. Of the 44 377 HIV-positive women included in the analysis, 35% were lost to care. 'B+ pregnant' women initiating ART in 2015 were less likely to have no follow-up (NFU) compared with 'own health' women starting ART during the same period (adjusted odds ratio: 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.94, P = 0.01). There was no statistical difference between the two groups during the other years in which ART was initiated. Of those returning for care after their first visit (N = 39 801), the 'B+ pregnant' women showed a higher risk of non-retention than the other group (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03-1.25) when ART was initiated in 2013. The risk decreased during the subsequent years, with no difference observed between the groups.conclusion PMTCT Option B+ programme scale-up has yielded positive results, including the maintenance of high HIV testing and ART initiation rates in ANC. Challenges still remain, however, in improving immediate engagement in care and long-term retention. Seeking alternative service delivery models to support existing health systems and prevent defaulters is required to achieve the UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets for PMTCT in Mozambique.