Background. Re-resection for incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) is associated with improved survival but little is known about residual disease (RD) and prognostic factors. In this study, survival after re-resection, RD, and prognostic factors are analyzed. Methods. Patients with iGBC were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, and pathology reports of reresected patients were reviewed. Survival and prognostic factors were analyzed. Results. Overall, 463 patients were included; 24% (n = 110) underwent re-resection after a median interval of 66 days. RD was present in 35% of patients and was most frequently found in the lymph nodes (23%). R0 resection was achieved in 93 patients (92%). Median overall survival (OS) of patients without re-resection was 13.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.6-15.6), compared with 52.6 months (95% CI 36.3-68.8) in re-resected patients (p \ 0.001). After re-resection, median OS was superior in patients without RD versus patients with RD (not reached vs. 23.1 months; p \ 0.001). In patients who underwent reresection, RD in the liver (hazard ratio [HR] 5.54; p \ 0.001) and lymph nodes (HR 2.35; p = 0.005) were the only significant prognostic factors in multivariable Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (

Due to the fast progression in molecular technologies such as next-generation sequencing, knowledge of genetic alterations in gallbladder cancer (GBC) increases. This systematic review provides an overview of frequently occurring genetic alterations occurring in GBC and their possible therapeutic implications. A literature search was performed utilizing PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Only studies reporting genetic alterations in human GBC were included. In total, data were extracted from 62 articles, describing a total of 3893 GBC samples. Frequently detected genetic alterations (>5% in >5 samples across all studies) in GBC for which targeted therapies are available in other cancer types included mutations in ATM, ERBB2, and PIK3CA, and ERBB2 amplifications. High tumor mutational burden (TMB-H) and microsatellite instability (MSI-H) were infrequently observed in GBC (1.7% and 3.5%, respectively). For solid cancers with TMB-H or MSI-H pembrolizumab is FDA-approved and shows an objective response rates of 50% for TMB-H GBC and 41% for MSI-H biliary tract cancer. Only nine clinical trials evaluated targeted therapies in GBC directed at frequently altered genes (ERBB2, ARID1A, ATM, and KRAS). This underlines the challenges to perform such clinical trials in this rare, heterogeneous cancer type and emphasizes the need for multicenter clinical trials.

BACKGROUND & AIMS:Colorectal cancers (CRCs) are rare in adolescents and adults ages 25 years or younger. We analyzed clinical, pathology, and molecular features of colorectal tumors from adolescents and young adults in an effort to improve genetic counseling, surveillance, and, ultimately, treatment and outcomes. METHODS:We analyzed clinical data and molecular and genetic features of colorectal tumor tissues from 139 adolescents or young adults (age, £25 y; median age, 23 y; 58% male), collected from 2000 through 2017; tumor tissues and clinical data were obtained from the nationwide network and registry of histopathology and cytopathology and The Netherlands Cancer Registry, respectively. DNA samples from tumors were analyzed for microsatellite instability, mutations in 56 genes, and genome-wide somatic copy number aberrations. RESULTS:Mucinous and/or signet ring cell components were observed in 33% of tumor samples. A genetic tumor risk syndrome was confirmed for 39% of cases. Factors associated with shorter survival time included younger age at diagnosis, signet ring cell carcinoma, the absence of a genetic tumor risk syndrome, and diagnosis at an advanced stage of disease. Compared with colorectal tumors from patients ages 60 years or older in the Cancer Genome Atlas, higher proportions of tumors from adolescents or young adults were microsatellite stable with nearly diploid genomes, or contained somatic mutations in TP53 and POLE, whereas lower proportions contained mutations in APC. CONCLUSIONS:We found clinical, molecular, and genetic features of CRCs in adolescents or young adults to differ from those of patients older than age 60 years. In 39% of patients a genetic tumor risk syndrome was identified. These findings provide insight into the pathogenesis of CRC in young patients and suggest new strategies for clinical management. Performing genetic and molecular analyses for every individual diagnosed with CRC at age 25 years or younger would aid in this optimization.

No abstract

PURPOSE Neuroendocrine carcinomas and mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gallbladder (NE GBC) are rare and highly aggressive entities. The cell of origin of NE GBC has been a matter of controversy. Here, we performed a comparative histopathologic and molecular analysis of NE GBC cases and, if present, associated precancerous lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS We selected cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2019 in the Netherlands. Precursors and carcinomas were immunohistochemically compared and analyzed for mutations, gene amplifications, microsatellite instability, and tumor mutational burden using an next-generation sequencing panel containing 523 cancer-related genes. In addition, presence of fusion genes was analyzed using a panel of 55 genes. RESULTS Sixty percent of neuroendocrine cases (6/10) presented with a precursor lesion, either intracholecystic papillary neoplasm (n = 3) or biliary intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 3). Immunohistochemically, neuroendocrine components were different from the epithelial precursor lesions. Molecular profiling, however, revealed TP53 mutations shared between different components in five of six cases, indicating a clonal relation. Furthermore, 40% of cases (4/10) harbored at least one potentially actionable alteration. This included (likely) pathogenic mutations in RAD54L, ATM, and BRCA2; amplifications of ERBB2 and MDM2; and a gene fusion involving FGFR3-TACC3. All cases were microsatellite-stable and had a tumor mutational burden of < 10 mutations/Mb. CONCLUSION Our data provide insight into the development of NE GBC and suggest a common origin of precancerous epithelial lesions and invasive neuroendocrine components, favoring the hypothesis of lineage transformation. Moreover, nearly half of the NE GBCs carried at least one potentially actionable molecular alteration, highlighting the importance of molecular testing in this highly lethal cancer.

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare, highly aggressive malignancy with a 5-year survival rate of 5–10% in advanced cases, highlighting the need for more effective therapies. The aim of this study was to identify potentially actionable therapeutic targets for GBC. Specimens and clinicopathological data of 642 GBC patients, diagnosed between 2000 and 2019 were collected using the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA) and the Netherlands Cancer Registry. All cases were histologically reviewed and a subset was subjected to a comprehensive next generation sequencing panel. We assessed mutations and gene amplifications in a panel of 54 actionable genes, tumor-mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI). Additionally, the entire cohort was screened for HER2, PD-L1, pan-TRK, and p53 expression with immunohistochemistry. Histopathological subtypes comprised biliary-type adenocarcinoma (AC, 69.6%), intestinal-type AC (20.1%) and other subtypes (10.3%). The median total TMB was 5.5 mutations/Mb (range: 0–161.1) and 17.7% of evaluable cases had a TMB of >10 mutations/Mb. MSI was observed in two cases. Apart from mutations in TP53 (64%), tumors were molecularly highly heterogeneous. Half of the tumors (50%) carried at least one molecular alteration that is targetable in other tumor types, including alterations in CDKN2A (6.0% biallelically inactivated), ERBB2 (9.3%) and PIK3CA (10%). Immunohistochemistry results correlated well with NGS results for HER2 and p53: Pearson r = 0.82 and 0.83, respectively. As half of GBC patients carry at least one potentially actionable molecular alteration, molecular testing may open the way to explore targeted therapy options for GBC patients.

Aims Outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment and survival have steadily improved during the past decades, accompanied by an increased risk of developing second primary tumours and metastatic tumours at unusual sites. Metastatic CRC can show mucosal colonisation, thereby mimicking a second primary tumour. This potential confusion could lead to incorrect diagnosis and consequently inadequate treatment of the patient. The aim of this study was to differentiate between metastatic CRC and a second primary (gallbladder cancer, GBC) using a combination of standard histopathology and molecular techniques. Methods and results Ten consecutive patients with both CRC and GBC were identified in our region using the Dutch National Pathology Archive (PALGA). Two patients served as negative controls. Histology of GBC was reviewed by nine pathologists. A combination of immunohistochemistry, microsatellite analysis, genomewide DNA copy number analysis and targeted somatic mutation analysis was used to aid in differential diagnosis. In two patients, CRC and GBC were clonally related, as confirmed by somatic mutation analysis. For one case, this was confirmed by genomewide DNA copy number analysis. However, in both cases, pathologists initially considered the GBC as a second primary tumour. Conclusions Metastatic CRC displaying mucosal colonisation is often misinterpreted as a second primary tumour. A combination of traditional histopathology and molecular techniques improves this interpretation, and lowers the risk of inadequate treatment.

Introduction Tumor-targeted imaging is a promising technique for the detection of lymph node metastases (LNM) and primary tumors. It remains unclear which biomarker is the most suitable target to distinguish malignant from healthy tissue in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC).Objective We performed an immunohistochemistry study to identify viable tumor markers for tumor-targeted imaging of EAC. Methods We used samples from 72 patients with EAC to determine the immunohistochemical expression of ten potential tumor biomarkers for EAC (carbonic anhydrase IX [CA-IX], carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA], hepatic growth factor receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor, epithelial membrane antigen [EMA], epithelial cell adhesion molecule [EpCAM], human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER-2], urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor-A [VEGF-A], and VEGF receptor 2). Immunohistochemistry was performed on tissue microarrays of LNM (n = 48), primary EACs (n = 62), fibrotic tissues (n = 11), nonmalignant lymph nodes (n = 24), and normal esophageal and gastric tissues (n = 40). Tumor marker staining was scored on intensity and percentage of positive cells. Results EMA and EpCAM showed strong expression in LNM (> 95%) and primary EACs (> 95%). Significant expression was also observed for LNM and EAC using VEGF-A (85 and 92%), CEA (68 and 54%), and CA-IX (4 and 34%). The other tumor biomarkers showed expression of 0-15% for LNM and primary EAC. Except for VEGF-A, nonmalignant lymph node staining was scored as slight or absent. Conclusions High expression rates and correlation between LNM in EAC combined with low expression rates in healthy lymph nodes and esophagus tissues were observed for EpCAM and CEA, meaning these are promising targets for tumortargeted imaging approaches for lymph nodes in patients with EAC. Key PointsThe use of intraoperative targeted imaging to detect lymph node metastases is promising and will be an important step forward in personalizing the surgical treatment of patients with esophageal cancer.The most suitable biomarker for targeted imaging techniques in lymph node metastases of esophageal adenocarcinoma remains unclear.Histological evaluation shows that epithelial cell adhesion molecule and carcinoembryonic antigen are suitable targets for image-guided esophageal surgery, both before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.