PurposeTrastuzumab improves survival in patients with HER2+ early breast cancer. However, cardiotoxicity remains a concern, particularly in the curative setting, and there are limited data on its incidence outside of clinical trials. We retrospectively evaluated the cardiotoxicity rates (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] decline, congestive heart failure [CHF], cardiac death or trastuzumab discontinuation) and assessed the performance of a proposed model to predict cardiotoxicity in routine clinical practice. MethodsPatients receiving curative trastuzumab between 2011-2018 were identi ed. Demographics, treatments, assessments and toxicities were recorded. Fisher's exact test, chi-squared and logistic regression were used. Results931 patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 54 years (range 24-83) and Charlson comorbidity index 0 (0-6), with 195 patients (20.9%) aged 65 or older. 228 (24.5%) were smokers. Anthracyclines were given in 608 (65.3%). Median number of trastuzumab doses was 18 (1-18). The HFA-ICOS cardiovascular risk was low in 401 patients (43.1%), medium in 454 (48.8%), high in 70 (7.5%) and very high in 6 (0.6%).Overall, 155 (16.6%) patients experienced cardiotoxicity: LVEF decline≥10% in 141 (15.1%), falling below 50% in 55 (5.9%), CHF NYHA class II in 42 (4.5%) and class III-IV in 5 (0.5%) and discontinuation due to cardiac reasons in 35 (3.8%). No deaths were observed.Cardiotoxicity rates increased with HFA-ICOS score (14.0% low, 16.7% medium, 30.3% high/very high; p=0.002). ConclusionsCardiotoxicity was relatively common (16.6%), but symptomatic heart failure on trastuzumab was rare in our cohort. The HFA-ICOS score identi es patients at high risk of cardiotoxicity

PurposeTrastuzumab improves survival in patients with HER2+ early breast cancer. However, cardiotoxicity remains a concern, particularly in the curative setting, and there are limited data on its incidence outside of clinical trials. We retrospectively evaluated the cardiotoxicity rates (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] decline, congestive heart failure [CHF], cardiac death or trastuzumab discontinuation) and assessed the performance of a proposed model to predict cardiotoxicity in routine clinical practice.MethodsPatients receiving curative trastuzumab between 2011-2018 were identified. Demographics, treatments, assessments and toxicities were recorded. Fisher’s exact test, chi-squared and logistic regression were used.Results931 patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 54 years (range 24-83) and Charlson comorbidity index 0 (0-6), with 195 patients (20.9%) aged 65 or older. 228 (24.5%) were smokers. Anthracyclines were given in 608 (65.3%). Median number of trastuzumab doses was 18 (1-18). The HFA-ICOS cardiovascular risk was low in 401 patients (43.1%), medium in 454 (48.8%), high in 70 (7.5%) and very high in 6 (0.6%).Overall, 155 (16.6%) patients experienced cardiotoxicity: LVEF decline≥10% in 141 (15.1%), falling below 50% in 55 (5.9%), CHF NYHA class II in 42 (4.5%) and class III-IV in 5 (0.5%) and discontinuation due to cardiac reasons in 35 (3.8%). No deaths were observed.Cardiotoxicity rates increased with HFA-ICOS score (14.0% low, 16.7% medium, 30.3% high/very high; p=0.002). ConclusionsCardiotoxicity was relatively common (16.6%), but symptomatic heart failure on trastuzumab was rare in our cohort. The HFA-ICOS score identifies patients at high risk of cardiotoxicity

BackgroundThe number of different antimicrobial recommendations between hospital trusts for the same indication in England is unknown.AimWe aimed to evaluate the heterogeneity of antimicrobial recommendations for seven common inpatient infections across hospital trusts in England and evaluate changes to recommendations following introduction of national (National Institute for Healthcare and Excellence, NICE) and international (WHO) antimicrobial guidelines.MethodsGuidelines published on the MicroGuide smartphone application were collected from December 2017 to February 2018 and re-evaluated between December 2019 and February 2020. The following indications were assessed: community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) CURB65 score ≥3, hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), infective exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (iCOPD), cellulitis, uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI), intra-abdominal infection (IAI) and sepsis of unknown source (SUS). On follow-up, compliance against WHO WATCH antibiotic and NICE recommendations was evaluated.ResultsGuidelines were obtained predominantly from England. Antibiotic regimens between hospitals became increasingly diverse across indications in the following order: uUTI, cellulitis, iCOPD, CAP, HAP, IAI and SUS. A piperacillin/tazobactam-based regimen was recommended in HAP (59%), SUS (39%) and IAI (30%). After 2 years, 107 changes were made to 357 antibiotic regimen recommendations; the overall number of regimens using piperacillin–tazobactam and WHO WATCH antibiotics remained similar. Compliance of recommendations with NICE guidelines as follows: iCOPD (100% adherent), uUTI (98%), cellulitis (90%), CAP (43%) and HAP (27%).ConclusionThe heterogeneity of antibiotic recommendations increased as the indicated infection was more severe, with broader underlying bacterial causes. Piperacillin–tazobactam remains favoured in antibiotic regimens, despite not recommended in WHO and NICE guidance.

Background AZD9496 is a potent orally bioavailable ER antagonist and degrader that has shown antitumor efficacy in a range of preclinical xenograft models including ESR1wild-type tamoxifen-resistant and long term estrogen deprived models and an ESR1 mutant model. Methods This is a phase I, open label global multicenter study in women with ER+ HER2–ve BC either metastatic or locoregionally recurrent, not amenable to treatment with curative intent. Patients are post-menopausal, or pre-menopausal women receiving LHRH agonist therapy, with disease progression after ≥6 months endocrine therapy for ER+ BC (no limit on number of prior endocrine therapies; ≤2 prior chemotherapies in advanced setting). The primary objective is to determine the safety and tolerability of AZD9496. Cohorts of 3-6 patients received daily oral therapy and dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring in cycle 1 (28 days) were assessed. Patients are dosed until MTD (defined as ≤1/6 patients with a DLT) or maximum feasible dose (MFD) is reached. Key secondary objectives include determination of single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary antitumor efficacy. ER target modulation by protein and gene expression is evaluated in circulating tumor cells and paired tumor biopsies. In addition to the dose escalation phase, expansion cohort(s) in patients with or without ESR1 mutations can be enrolled to examine the safety, tolerability, PK and biological activity of AZD9496 further. Results Preliminary data as of 30th April 2016: 45 patients (median age 62 (range 41-83); 38 post-menopausal, 7 pre/perimenopausal; visceral metastases 76%, prior fulvestrant 25/45) received AZD9496 in 7 dose escalation cohorts: 20mg QD n=4, 40mg BID n=6, 80mg BID n=5, 150mg BID n=6, 250mg BID n=6, 400mg BID n=6, 600mg BID n=6 and also a 250mg BID expansion cohort n=6. The majority of adverse events (AEs) were grade 1 or 2; the most common treatment-related AEs (≥10%) have been diarrhoea (33%), fatigue (27%), nausea (22%), upper abdominal pain (13%) and increased liver function tests (13%). Six patients had treatment-related grade 3 AEs, 5 of which were manageable with dose interruption +/- dose reduction. Specifically, three had DLTs: grade 3 increased AST/ALT/GGT-150mg BID, serious adverse reaction (SAR) leading to withdrawal; grade 3 diarrhoea and grade 3 increased AST/ALT/GGT-400mg BID, SAR, manageable with dose reductions; grade 3 diarrhoea 600mg BID, manageable with dose reduction. The MTD/MFD has not been reached. Following the first dose up to 400mg the AZD9496 exposure increased in reasonable proportion to increasing dose. At 600mg a more than dose-proportional increase in exposure was observed. Evidence of reduced ER and Ki67 has been observed in on-study biopsies at 150mg BID and above. 10 subjects received treatment for >3-<6 months (5 ongoing, 5 discontinued),4 subjects >6-<12 months (3 ongoing, 1 discontinued), 3 subjects ≥1 year (2 ongoing, 1 discontinued). Conclusions AZD9496 has a tolerable safety profile, evidence of PD biomarker modulation and prolonged stabilisation of disease in women with heavily pre-treated ER+ve ABC. Citation Format: Hamilton E, Patel M, Armstrong A, Baird R, Jhaveri K, Hoch M, Morgan S, Dowdall T, Schiavon G, Klinowska T, Weir H, Bujac S, Nash T, Im S-A. A phase I study of AZD9496, a novel oral, selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) in women with estrogen receptor positive, HER-2 negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-12-03.