Remission criteria including PROMs are stringent but important to achieve sustained remission. Early intensive treatment and efforts to improve patients' health perceptions may result in better prognosis for RA.
In routine clinical practice, ABA demonstrated satisfactory clinical efficacy and safety in patients with established RA for 52 weeks. The clinical efficacy of ABA increased with time even after 24 weeks, and this was strongly influenced by concomitant MTX use. Our study provides valuable real-world findings on the longterm management of RA with ABA.
This observational retrospective study examined whether abatacept efficacy could be augmented with concomitant methotrexate (MTX) or tacrolimus (TAC) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who experienced failure with prior biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and in whom favorable therapeutic efficacy is difficult to achieve. All patients with a prior biological DMARD history who were treated with abatacept for 52 weeks and registered in a Japanese multicentre registry were included. Clinical efficacy and safety of abatacept according to the concomitant drug used, i.e., none (ABT-mono), MTX (ABT-MTX), and TAC (ABT-TAC), were compared. A greater mean percent change of DAS28-ESR was observed in the ABT-TAC group compared with the ABT-mono group at weeks 12 (-20.5 vs. -5.4 %, p = 0.035) and 24 (-25.0 vs. -11.0 %, p = 0.036). ABT-MTX and ABT-TAC groups had a significantly higher proportion of patients who achieved low disease activity (LDA) within 52 weeks compared with the respective baselines, while no significant change was observed in the ABT-mono group. A higher proportion of patients in the ABT-TAC group achieved EULAR moderate response compared with the ABT-mono group at week 52 (66.7 vs. 35.0 %, p = 0.025). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that concomitant TAC use was independently associated with the achievement of LDA and EULAR response at 52 weeks, while concomitant MTX use was not. Concomitant TAC use may offer a suitable option for RA patients treated with abatacept after prior biological DMARD failure, likely because both abatacept and TAC affect T cell activation.
Objective. To determine the effects of concomitant methotrexate (MTX) on the incidence of large joint replacement resulting from the progression of large joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was performed using a multicenter registry. In total, 803 patients with RA who received etanercept or adalimumab were included. The first large joint replacement during treatment with etanercept or adalimumab was used as the outcome variable in predictive analyses. The cumulative incidence of large joint replacement was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and the impact of concomitant MTX on the incidence of large joint replacement was assessed with Cox proportional hazards models. Propensity score matching was used to reduce selection bias. Results. Of all patients, 601 (75%) received concomitant MTX at a median dosage of 8 mg/week (interquartile range 6-8). A total of 49 patients (62 joints) underwent large joint replacement during treatment with etanercept or adalimumab. The incidence of large joint replacement for patients with concomitant MTX was significantly lower than that for patients without MTX (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that concomitant MTX independently predicted large joint replacement (hazard ratio 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.65). Additionally, propensity score-matched analysis demonstrated that patients with concomitant MTX had a significantly lower incidence of large joint replacement than those without concomitant MTX (P 5 0.032). Conclusion. Concomitant MTX reduces the incidence of large joint replacement in patients with RA treated with TNF inhibitors.
Although the sample size was small, the results of this retrospective study suggest that the ABT+ TAC combination therapy has at least comparable safety and efficacy to those of the ABT+ MTX combination, and that it can thus be a useful option for patients who cannot take MTX.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.