No abstract

Abstract

Background: The advancements in intensive care in recent decades have enabled better survival of newborn. Knowledge of essential newborn care is important for the survival, growth, and development of a newborn. In spite of its essentiality, most health-care professionals do not know and follow the World Health Organization recommendation. Aim and objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge of nurses regarding essential newborn Care in Special Care Neonatal Units (SCANU). Materials and methods: This observational study was conducted among the nurses working in SCANU of Chattogram Medical College and Hospital, Chattogram Maa- O- Shishu Hospital and Bangabandu memorial hospital of University of Science and Technology, Chattogram (USTC) for 6 months. Purposive sampling technique were applied for selecting the sample. A structured data sheet was predesigned to collect data. Knowledge regarding Essential Newborn Care among the nurses graded as satisfactory or not satisfactory. Results: In this study it was observed that 69.0% nurses had completed diploma in nursing and midwife education, B. Sc in nursing 11.0%, diploma in nursing 7.0%. 56.0% nurses attended special courses/training in neonatology. 94.75% of the nurses had satisfactory knowledge regarding essential newborn care. 58.0% of nurses washed their hands with disinfectant solution before handling the baby, 99.0% mentioned that the baby must be breast feeding within 1st hour of delivery, 92.0% mentioned that baby must be fed 6 months of exclusive breast feed, 91.0% knew how to stabilize body temperature of low birth weight newborn. The knowledge regarding essential newborn care were almost similar with age, gender, religion, marital status, educational level, working place and attending special courses/training in neonatology. Conclusion: Most of the nurses working in SCANU of both Government and non-government hospitals of Chattogram have good knowledge regarding ENC. This knowledge appeared irrespective of their age, gender, religion, marital status, working place and special courses/training in neonatology. J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2021; 39(3): 185-192

Background: Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) are global problem of major concern. Spontaneous reporting of ADRs is the cornerstone of pharmacovigilance. However, underreporting is a huge problem due to lack of reporting culture among healthcare professionals. Objectives: the purpose of the present study was to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice of physicians regarding reporting of ADRs, and pharmacovigilance as well as to identify the reasons for under-reporting with suggestion for improvement in the reporting system. Methodology: This cross sectional, observational study was conducted to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding adverse drug reaction reporting among physicians working in different level hospitals of Bangladesh. Data were collected from 308 physicians during the period of January to December 2012 using structured questionnaire. Result: Response rate was 97%. Majority of the respondent (95%) felt that ADR reporting is necessary and it is a professional obligation. Inadequate knowledge of reporting mechanism, unavailability of reporting form, complex reporting system, lack of time and inadequate expertise were the main reasons cited for underreporting. Majority of the respondents suggested regular training sessions, strengthening the drug administration department, government law, regular follow up and inclusion of ADR reporting exercise in undergraduate and post graduate curriculum may help to improve the situation. Conclusion:The deficiency of knowledge, attitude and practice of physician regarding ADR reporting need urgent attention on priority basis not only for the success of pharmacovigilance program but also for better clinical management of the patient in general. [J Shaheed Suhrawardy Med Coll, 2014;6(1):18-22]

Background: Nebulized salbutamol is commonly used in treatment of asthma in children. The use of nebulized MgSO4 is one of the different treatment options available during acute exacerbation. Objective: To compare the efficacy of nebulized MgSO4 with nebulized salbutamol in the treatment of acute asthma in children. Materials and method: This randomized controlled study was conducted in Dhaka Medical College Hospital between January to December 2016. Children of 7-12 years with acute exacerbation of asthma were randomized into study group-A (MgSO4 group, n=30) and control group-B (Salbutamol group, n=30). Children of both groups were treated with serial nebulization thrice at 20 minute intervals by either 2.4 ml (4% MgSO4, 96 mg) or salbutamol (0.15 mg/kg minimum 2.5 mg) with 2.5 ml of isotonic normal saline. Results: The mean final PEFR were not different between the two groups (275.0±41.42 L/min in MgS04 group and 263±36.17 L/min in salbutamol group). The increase in PEF was statistically significant and comparable in both groups (by 35.1% in the MgS04 group and by 42.1% in the salbutamol group). Fischl score improvement was comparable and significant in both groups (4.31 to 0.43 in MgS04 group and 4.29 to 0.76 in salbutamol group). Statistically significant increase in oxygen saturation and reduction of heart rate was found in MgS04 group without any side effects. Nebulized MgSO4 was found having significant bronchodilator effect which is comparable to salbutamol. Conclusion: Nebulized MgS04 was found equally effective as nebulized salbutamol in the treatment of severe acute asthma in children. Bangladesh J Child Health 2020; VOL 44 (1) :24-29