Background Depressive and manic episodes within bipolar disorder (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) involve altered mood, sleep, and activity, alongside physiological alterations wearables can capture. Objective Firstly, we explored whether physiological wearable data could predict (aim 1) the severity of an acute affective episode at the intra-individual level and (aim 2) the polarity of an acute affective episode and euthymia among different individuals. Secondarily, we explored which physiological data were related to prior predictions, generalization across patients, and associations between affective symptoms and physiological data. Methods We conducted a prospective exploratory observational study including patients with BD and MDD on acute affective episodes (manic, depressed, and mixed) whose physiological data were recorded using a research-grade wearable (Empatica E4) across 3 consecutive time points (acute, response, and remission of episode). Euthymic patients and healthy controls were recorded during a single session (approximately 48 h). Manic and depressive symptoms were assessed using standardized psychometric scales. Physiological wearable data included the following channels: acceleration (ACC), skin temperature, blood volume pulse, heart rate (HR), and electrodermal activity (EDA). Invalid physiological data were removed using a rule-based filter, and channels were time aligned at 1-second time units and segmented at window lengths of 32 seconds, as best-performing parameters. We developed deep learning predictive models, assessed the channels’ individual contribution using permutation feature importance analysis, and computed physiological data to psychometric scales’ items normalized mutual information (NMI). We present a novel, fully automated method for the preprocessing and analysis of physiological data from a research-grade wearable device, including a viable supervised learning pipeline for time-series analyses. Results Overall, 35 sessions (1512 hours) from 12 patients (manic, depressed, mixed, and euthymic) and 7 healthy controls (mean age 39.7, SD 12.6 years; 6/19, 32% female) were analyzed. The severity of mood episodes was predicted with moderate (62%-85%) accuracies (aim 1), and their polarity with moderate (70%) accuracy (aim 2). The most relevant features for the former tasks were ACC, EDA, and HR. There was a fair agreement in feature importance across classification tasks (Kendall W=0.383). Generalization of the former models on unseen patients was of overall low accuracy, except for the intra-individual models. ACC was associated with “increased motor activity” (NMI>0.55), “insomnia” (NMI=0.6), and “motor inhibition” (NMI=0.75). EDA was associated with “aggressive behavior” (NMI=1.0) and “psychic anxiety” (NMI=0.52). Conclusions Physiological data from wearables show potential to identify mood episodes and specific symptoms of mania and depression quantitatively, both in BD and MDD. Motor activity and stress-related physiological data (EDA and HR) stand out as potential digital biomarkers for predicting mania and depression, respectively. These findings represent a promising pathway toward personalized psychiatry, in which physiological wearable data could allow the early identification and intervention of mood episodes.

No abstract

Mood disorders are severe and chronic mental conditions exacting high costs from society. The lack of reliable biomarkers to aid clinicians in tailoring pharmacotherapy based on distinguishable patient-specific traits means that the current prescribing paradigm is largely one of trial and error. Previous studies showed that different biological signatures, such as patterns of heart rate variability or electro-dermal reactivity, are associated with clinically meaningful outcomes. Against this backdrop, the advances in machine learning and the spread of wearable devices capable of providing continuous and ecological monitoring of patients may unlock great opportunities in mental healthcare. We herewith present a pilot study on mania and depression where we moved beyond the simple disease state binary classification but pursued the more informative and clinically meaningful task of differentiating between levels of disease severity. While most previous similar endeavours used recording segments extracted from the same subjects for both training and testing, we explicitly carried out model development and evaluation on segments from different groups of patients, in order to have a fair assessment of the model out-of-sample generalisation. This illustrated how individuals heterogeneity and non-disease-related dimensions of variations (e.g. sex, age, physical fitness) may dominate the signal so that in low sample size regimes a model might learn and overfit subject-specific patterns rather than capturing disease-relevant traits generalisable across disorders. Lastly, we developed a viable baseline for pre-processing raw data from wristband recordings and compared three classical and two deep-learning models to identify levels of disease severity.

Bipolar depression is the most prevalent phase of bipolar disorder (BD). There is a risk of inducing treatment‐emergent affective switches (TEAS) with antidepressants (ADs). Hence, clinical guidelines do not recommend their use in monotherapy. Cariprazine is a dopamine‐serotonin partial agonist, with a recent FDA approval as a monotherapy for BD type 1 (BD‐I) depression. To our knowledge, there is no significant evidence of cariprazine‐induced TEAS in bipolar depression. We describe three clinical cases of patients admitted to our acute psychiatric ward who developed manic episodes after the introduction of low doses of cariprazine. Two of the patients met the DSM‐5 criteria for BD‐I, and one for schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. All patients were initially treated with low doses of cariprazine (1.5 mg) during a depressive phase. All three cases were simultaneously treated with mood stabilizers, regardless of which they switched to a manic episode when cariprazine was initiated. In our review of previous studies assessing the efficacy and side effects profile of cariprazine in BD‐I, TEAS have not been found to be significant. However, according to our experience, cariprazine may induce affective switches in BD‐I patients. Patients and psychiatrists should receive information regarding early warning symptoms and monitor possible cariprazine‐induced mood switching.