TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractA self-diverting-acid based on viscoelastic surfactant (SDVA) has been used recently on stimulation treatments of carbonate formations. The new system has been proven successfull in more than 250 field applications. The decrease of acid concentration during the spending process viscosifies the fluid by the transformation from spherical micelles to an entangled wormlike micellar structure while penetrating the carbonate rock. The highly viscous fluid acts as a temporary barrier and diverts the fluid into the remaining lower-permeability treating zones. After treatment, the SDVA barrier breaks when contacted either by formation hydrocarbons or pre-and post-flush fluids. Quantifying diversion, fluid efficiency, and cleanup are important factors for successful candidate selection and job design. Laboratory tests defining these key factors are presented in this paper. This paper demonstrates the diverting ability of the acid as a function of permeability, characterized by introducing the concept of maximum pressure ratio (dPmax/dPo) supported by core-flow and acid conductivity tests using limestone and dolomite cores. Results demonstrate high dPmax/dPo in highpermeability cores and low dPmax/dPo in low-permeability cores. Retained permeability measurements are presented that assesses the level of cleanup. Flow initiation experiments of spent acid systems with gas and brine were performed to illustrate the cleanup behavior of SDVA in comparison to gelled acid systems under conditions encountered in gas and oil wells. The results indicate that SDVA systems clean up easily and that SDVA provides higher regained permeability than conventional gelled acid systems.
Summary A self-diverting-acid based on viscoelastic surfactant (SDVA) has been successfully used recently on numerous stimulation treatments of carbonate formations in various fields. The decrease of acid concentration during the spending process viscosifies the fluid through the transformation from spherical micelles to an entangled wormlike micellar structure while penetrating the carbonate rock. The highly viscous fluid acts as a temporary barrier and diverts the fluid into the remaining lower-permeability treating zones. After treatment, the SDVA barrier breaks when contacted either by formation hydrocarbons or pre- and postflush fluids. Quantifying diversion, fluid efficiency, and cleanup are important factors for successful candidate selection and job design. Laboratory tests defining these key factors are presented in this paper. This paper demonstrates the diverting ability of the acid as a function of permeability, characterized by introducing the concept of maximum pressure ratio (dPmax/dP0) supported by core-flow and acid conductivity tests using limestone and dolomite cores. Results demonstrate high dPmax/dP0 in high-permeability cores and low dPmax/dP0 in low-permeability cores. Retained permeability measurements are presented that assess the level of cleanup. Flow-initiation experiments of spent acid systems with gas and brine were performed to illustrate the cleanup behavior of SDVA in comparison to gelled acid systems under conditions encountered in gas and oil wells. The results indicate that SDVA systems clean up easily and that SDVA provides higher regained permeability than conventional gelled acid systems. Background The purpose of matrix stimulation in limestone and dolomite reservoirs is the formation of wormholes, which can bypass the damaged areas and increase the effective wellbore area. When acid enters the formation with the highest injectivity it creates highly conductive flow channels, called wormholes, by dissolving the carbonate-containing minerals. Consequently, the injectivity will be further increased. The other zones are left untreated by the acid. To overcome this problem, a diverting agent is used. Mechanical diverters such as ball sealers, degradable ball sealers, rock salt, and benzoic acid flakes are used alone or in conjunction with chemical diverters based on foams or polymeric gels (Williams et al. 1979; Economides and Nolte 1989). These materials can work effectively only in a narrow permeability contrast and may result in residual damage (Lynn and Nasr-El-Din 2001). These characteristics are highly undesirable, particularly in low-pressure gas wells, and in long vertical and horizontal sections. Polymer-based systems such as in-situ crosslinked gelled acids (XLGA) have been used in the field as self-diverting fluids. These systems rely on a pH-triggered increase of viscosity during the acid spending process. Essentially, the pH change activates a metallic reagent that crosslinks the polymer chains, and the resulting viscosity increase causes a higher flow resistance (Mukherjee and Gudney 1993; Saxon et al. 1997). Further increase of the pH deactivates the metallic crosslinker and breaks the fluid down to the original linear gel with dissociated polymer chains. However, because of the nature of the long polymer chains, potential damage of the formation may occur (Lynn and Nasr-El-Din 2001). Recently, a new polymer-free self-diverting acid system was developed with a fluid stability in temperatures greater than 300°F (Taylor et al. 2003; Chang et al. 2001). The fluid system has been applied successfully in both matrix (Al-Mutawa et al. 2001) and acid-fracturing (Al-Muhareb et al. 2003; Artola et al. 2004) treatments. It causes rapid viscosity development throughout the spending process. The reduction in acid concentration, together with the simultaneous release of ions in solution, promotes the transformation from spherical micelles into worm-like micelles, resulting in increased viscosity of the fluid. The highly viscous fluid subsequently diverts the remaining acid treatment fluid into zones of lower injectivity by reducing the acid loss into wormholes, resulting in an improved zonal coverage of the treatment interval. Diversion tests using multiple parallel cores with varying permeabilities showed effective stimulation in all cores (Taylor et al. 2003; Chang et al. 2001). This paper presents new data providing further insight into the understanding of the unique properties of this SDVA based on laboratory studies. Specifically described are the chemical and physical properties of the SDVA fluid, including cleanup efficiency that is relevant to low-pressure reservoirs.
Offshore reservoirs requiring sand control pose a major completion challenge because of extremely high cost and risk involved in remedial treatments, particularly in sub-sea completion and/or deep-water environments. It is therefore of utmost importance to ensure sand control without sacrificing flow conformance, recoverable reserves and well deliverability throughout the expected life of the completion. A major trend in these environments is towards open-hole, horizontal, gravel-packed completions. Although gravel packing stabilizes the wellbore, it can also entrap the filter-cake formed by the reservoir drilling fluid, potentially resulting in high drawdown requirements (flow initiation pressures) and/or low production rates (retained permeabilities). The cleanup procedures in the industry have varied significantly from no cleanup at all to complicated two-stage breaker treatments involving post-completion coiled tubing intervention, with no guidelines existing in the literature. In this paper, we present experimental results and field cases involving filter-cake flow-back through gravel packs with and without cleanup. Effects of various parameters, including gravel size (40/60, 20/40, and 12/20), formation permeability, drill-solids type (clays, quartz) and concentration, and the type of cleanup fluid have been investigated. Flow initiation pressure and retained permeabilities during flow back are reported as a function of these parameters. The experimental results show that the flow initiation pressure is a strong function of gravel size and the type of drill solids. It is concluded that, in clean (low-to-no clay content) formations of large grains and high permeabilities (~ several darcies) requiring large gravel sizes (e.g., 12/20), an enzyme or an oxidizer treatment is sufficient based on laboratory results and productivity predictions. This conclusion is also supported by several field applications as shown. In lower permeability (~ 100–250 md) formations of small sand sizes requiring smaller gravel (e.g., 40/60) elimination of both the fluid loss control agent (starch) and bridging agent (CaCO3) is necessary based on high flow initiation pressures and low retained permeabilities. In intermediate permeability (~ 500–800 md) formations of medium size sand-grains typically requiring 20/40 gravel, the results depend strongly on the type of drill solids: in clean formations (no clays in drilling fluid), an enzyme or an oxidizer treatment is sufficient, while in dirty formations removal of both CaCO3 and starch is necessary. These results are also supported by field case histories presented in the paper. Introduction Gravel packing has been gaining wider popularity in open-hole horizontal completions where sand control is required, particularly in sub-sea completion and/or deep-water environment. The cost of intervention in such cases makes risk mitigation a much more pronounced task. Until recently, a large majority of horizontal sand control completions have utilized standalone screens. However, because a substantial fraction of these wells have failed prematurely (either productivity loss due to screen plugging or loss of sand control due to screen erosion),1 many operators have changed their primary completion technique in these wells from standalone screens to gravel packing. This is particularly true in formations containing a large fraction of non-pay (shale, mudstone/siltstone) and/or have a wide particle size distribution.2
TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractDue to the increased cost of scale management in subsea compared to platform or onshore fields, and because of the more limited opportunities for interventions, it is becoming increasingly important to carry out a risk analysis process for scale management as early as possible in the field development plan. This process involves identifying the potential scale risks, and analysing and comparing the options available for managing those risks.This paper discusses how this risk analysis process should be carried out, with a strong emphasis on the need to integrate all the available production chemistry and reservoir engineering data. To demonstrate this process, an example from a development complex, which lies in >400 m (>1300 ft) water depths offshore West Africa, is used. The process has involved the following steps:Analysis of available brine samples to identify maximum scaling potential. Laboratory testing of available scale inhibitors to identify chemistry best suited to this system. Study of analogue fields to identify scaling risks in these fields, and how these risks have been managed, with implications for fields currently being studied. Modification of full field reservoir simulation model to predict seawater breakthrough and duration of seawater production, to identify when, for how long, and using how much inhibitor the wells would require squeeze treatments to control scale. This process involves using flow profiles derived from the reservoir simulation model, and applying them in a near well squeeze simulator to predict treatment performance to minimum inhibitor concentration measured from laboratory studies. Well-by-well analysis of predicted seawater production profiles and total water production rates to identify
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.