Peri-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection increases postoperative mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal duration of planned delay before surgery in patients who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection. This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study included patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery during October 2020. Surgical patients with pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared with those without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted 30-day mortality rates stratified by time from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection to surgery. Among 140,231 patients (116 countries), 3127 patients (2.2%) had a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Adjusted 30-day mortality in patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection was 1.5% (95%CI 1.4-1.5). In patients with a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, mortality was increased in patients having surgery within 0-2 weeks, 3-4 weeks and 5-6 weeks of the diagnosis (odds ratio (95%CI) 4.1 (3.3-4.8), 3.9 (2.6-5.1) and 3.6 (2.0-5.2), respectively). Surgery performed ≥ 7 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was associated with a similar mortality risk to baseline (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.5 (0.9-2.1)). After a ≥ 7 week delay in undertaking surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients with ongoing symptoms had a higher mortality than patients whose symptoms had resolved or who had been asymptomatic (6.0% (95%CI 3.2-8.7) vs. 2.4% (95%CI 1.4-3.4) vs. 1.3% (95%CI 0.6-2.0), respectively). Where possible, surgery should be delayed for at least 7 weeks following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with ongoing symptoms ≥ 7 weeks from diagnosis may benefit from further delay.

SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with an increased rate of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients. Since surgical patients are already at higher risk of venous thromboembolism than general populations, this study aimed to determine if patients with peri-operative or prior SARS-CoV-2 were at further increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We conducted a planned sub-study and analysis from an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study of elective and emergency patients undergoing surgery during October 2020. Patients from all surgical specialties were included. The primary outcome measure was venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) within 30 days of surgery. SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was defined as peri-operative (7 days before to 30 days after surgery); recent (1-6 weeks before surgery); previous (≥7 weeks before surgery); or none. Information on prophylaxis regimens or pre-operative anti-coagulation for baseline comorbidities was not available. Postoperative venous thromboembolism rate was 0.5% (666/123,591) in patients without SARS-CoV-2; 2.2% (50/2317) in patients with peri-operative SARS-CoV-2; 1.6% (15/953) in patients with recent SARS-CoV-2; and 1.0% (11/1148) in patients with previous SARS-CoV-2. After adjustment for confounding factors, patients with peri-operative (adjusted odds ratio 1.5 (95%CI 1.1-2.0)) and recent SARS-CoV-2 (1.9 (95%CI 1.2-3.3)) remained at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, with a borderline finding in previous SARS-CoV-2 (1.7 (95%CI 0.9-3.0)). Overall, venous thromboembolism was independently associated with 30-day mortality ). In patients with SARS-CoV-2, mortality without venous thromboembolism was 7.4% (319/4342) and with venous thromboembolism was 40.8% (31/76). Patients undergoing surgery with peri-operative or recent SARS-CoV-2 appear to be at increased risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism compared with patients with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment are unknown in this cohort of patients, and these data should be interpreted accordingly.

In many healthcare settings, benchmarking for complex procedures has become a mandatory requirement by competent authorities, regulators, payers and patients to assure clinical performance, cost-effectiveness and safe care of patients. In several countries inside and outside Europe, benchmarking systems have been established for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but access is not universal. As benchmarking is now integrated into the FACT-JACIE standards, the EBMT and JACIE established a Clinical Outcomes Group (COG) to develop and introduce a universal system accessible across EBMT members. Established systems from seven European countries (United Kingdom,

This report describes hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) activity and outcome in Australia and New Zealand during the years 2005 to 2013. In 2013, 1018 autologous, 221 allogeneic with related donors, and 264 allogeneic with unrelated donors HCT were performed in 40 centers in Australia, with corresponding figures of 147, 39, and 47 in 6 centers in New Zealand. Annual numbers of HCT in 2013 increased, compared to 2005, by 25% in Australia and by 52% in New Zealand. The majority of both allogeneic and autologous HCT used peripheral blood as the stem cell source for all years studied. Major indications for transplantation were acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), plasma cell disorders, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Overall survival probabilities at 5 years after transplantation for adult (16+) allogeneic first HCT recipients were 54.2% for ALL, 46.0% for AML, 48.4% for myelodysplastic syndromes, and 58.6% for NHL. Consistent patterns over time include a steady increase in HCT, particularly for older recipients, relatively constant numbers of allografts using cord blood, and a recent increase in the number of allografts with 2 or more HLA-mismatched related donors.

, CM Vajdic 5 and CAST study group 6 Population-based evidence on second cancer risk following autologous haematopoietic SCT (HCT) is lacking. We quantified second cancer risk for a national, population-based cohort of adult Australians receiving autologous HCT for cancer and notified to the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry 1992Registry -2007. Cancer diagnoses and deaths were ascertained by linkage with the Australian Cancer Database and National Death Index. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated and Cox regression models were used to estimate within-cohort risk factors treating death as a competing risk. During a median 2.5 years follow-up, second cancer risk was modestly increased compared with the general population (SIR 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2-1.6); significantly elevated risk was also observed for AML/myelodysplastic syndrome (SIR ¼ 20.6), melanoma (SIR ¼ 2.6) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (SIR ¼ 3.3). Recipients at elevated risk of any second cancer included males, and those transplanted at a younger age, in an earlier HCT era, or for lymphoma or testicular cancer. Male sex, older age (445 years) and history of relapse after HCT predicted melanoma risk. Transplantation for Hodgkin lymphoma and older age were associated with lung cancer risk. Second malignancies are an important late effect and these results inform and emphasize the need for cancer surveillance in autologous HCT survivors.Bone Marrow Transplantation (2014) 49, 691-698; doi:10.1038/bmt.2014.13; published online 17 February 2014Keywords: autologous transplantation; outcomes; risk; surveillance INTRODUCTION Autologous haematopoietic SCT (HCT) is increasingly being used in Australia and elsewhere as a therapy for several haematopoietic and solid organ malignancies. 1,2 Life expectancy following HCT has also improved, 3 increasing the number of HCT survivors globally. Characterizing late effects and identifying those at risk will maximize the long-term health of HCT recipients.Second cancers are a recognized late effect of chemo-radiation therapy in general, and in the HCT setting specifically. 4-11 The cumulative incidence of second cancer after autologous HCT may be as high as 29% after 15 years, 11 with the greatest excess risk observed for AML and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs). 10,[12][13][14][15] Most prior studies have examined second cancer risk in recipients of allogeneic and autologous HCT, with the largest based on international transplant registry cohorts. 9 Furthermore, most studies ascertained second cancers from hospital records or by self-report, potentially under-estimating risk. There are no population-based estimates of the risk of secondary cancer in adult recipients of autologous HCT. We examined the incidence and risk factors for second cancer in a national, population-based cohort of 7765 adult Australian autologous HCT recipients, 1992HCT recipients, -2007