Background and objectives: Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a severe peritoneal fibrotic reaction in patients on long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD). The early clinical features may be nonspecific. The purpose of the study is to assess the reliability and diagnostic utility of abdominal CT scanning in the diagnosis of EPS.Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Abdominopelvic CT scans of 27 patients diagnosed with EPS on clinical and radiologic grounds in our unit from 1997 to 2006 were retrospectively analyzed. In addition, 35 control CT scans were scored: 15 from hemodialysis patients (HD controls) and 20 from patients on PD (PD controls). Scans were anonymized and scored independently by three radiologists.Results: Inter-rater agreement was moderate to very good (kappa ‫؍‬ 0.40 to 0.75) for peritoneal calcification, bowel distribution, bowel wall thickening, and bowel dilation but poorer for loculation of ascites and peritoneal thickening. There was a strongly significant difference between the total CT scan scores at EPS diagnosis and controls (P < 0.00001). Each individual parameter also showed significant differences between EPS and controls (P < 0.006). Bowel tethering and peritoneal calcification were the most specific parameters, and. loculation was the least discriminatory parameter. Interestingly, prediagnostic scans a median of 1.5 yr before EPS diagnosis were normal or near-normal in 9 of 13 EPS patients.Conclusions: CT scanning is a valid and reliable adjunct to the diagnosis of EPS but may not be useful as a screening tool, as the prediagnostic scans did not show abnormalities in many patients who subsequently developed EPS.

Ultrasonography (US) is often the initial imaging modality employed in the evaluation of renal diseases. Despite improvements in B-mode and Doppler imaging, US still faces limitations in the assessment of focal renal masses and complex cysts as well as the microcirculation. The applications of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) in the kidneys have dramatically increased to overcome these shortcomings with guidelines underlining their importance. This article describes microbubble contrast agents and their role in renal imaging. Microbubble contrast agents consist of a low solubility complex gas surrounded by a phospholipid shell. Microbubbles are extremely safe and well-tolerated pure intravascular agents that can be used in renal failure and obstruction, where computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging contrast agents may have deleterious effects. Their intravascular distribution allows for quantitative perfusion analysis of the microcirculation, diagnosis of vascular problems, and qualitative assessment of tumor vascularity and enhancement patterns. Low acoustic power real-time prolonged imaging can be performed without exposure to ionizing radiation and at lower cost than CT or MR imaging. CEUS can accurately distinguish pseudotumors from true tumors. CEUS has been shown to be more accurate than unenhanced US and rivals contrast material-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of malignancy in complex cystic renal lesions and can upstage the Bosniak category. CEUS can demonstrate specific enhancement patterns allowing the differentiation of benign and malignant solid tumors as well as focal inflammatory lesions. In conclusion, CEUS is useful in the characterization of indeterminate renal masses and cysts.

Translumbar inferior vena caval CVCs can offer relatively safe and effective long-term haemodialysis access in patients with no other options.

In this study, we analyze the outcomes of transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS), determine the different anatomical positions of TRAS, and establish cardiovascular and immunological risk factors associated with its development. One hundred thirty-seven of 999 (13.7%) patients had TRAS diagnosed by angiography; 119/137 (86.9%) were treated with angioplasty, of which 113/137 (82.5%) were stented. Allograft survival in the TRASþ intervention, TRASþ nonintervention and TRASÀ groups was 80.4%, 71.3% and 83.1%, respectively. There was no difference in allograft survival between the TRASþ intervention and TRASÀ groups, p ¼ 0.12; there was a difference in allograft survival between the TRASÀ and TRASþ nonintervention groups, p < 0.001, and between the TRASþ intervention and TRASþ nonintervention groups, p ¼ 0.037. TRAS developed at the anastomosis, within a bend/kink or distally. Anastomotic TRAS developed in living donor recipients; postanastomotic TRAS (TRAS-P) developed in diabetic and older patients who received grafts from deceased, older donors. Compared with the TRASÀ group, patients with TRAS-P were more likely to have had rejection with arteritis, odds ratio (OR): 4.83 p ¼ 0.0095, and capillaritis,), p ¼ 0.033. Patients with TRAS-P were more likely to have developed de novo class II DSA compared with TRASÀ patients hazard ratio: 4.41 (2.0-9.73), p < 0.001. TRAS is a heterogeneous condition with TRAS-P having both alloimmune and traditional cardiovascular risk factors.