Regulations governing human activities in streams and riparian zones frequently differ depending on whether or not a stream reach supports fish. Fish presence or absence is usually determined by sampling or by assuming the presence of fish if the stream exhibits certain physical characteristics. Field surveys of fish occurrence in streams are time consuming and expensive. Inference of fish presence from simple thresholds of physical attributes, such as gradient or channel width alone, is inaccurate. We attempted to improve the accuracy and efficiency of this determination by developing a geographical information systems (GIS)‐based predictive model. A 10‐m digital elevation model incorporated field data on fish distribution from 517 streams in western Washington State and GIS‐derived representations of the physical characteristics of stream networks. A model predicting the upstream extent of fish occurrence was derived using logistic regression models coupled with a heuristic “stopping rule.” Candidate variables included stream gradient, upstream basin area, elevation, and mean annual precipitation. When assessed against independent survey data, 91.9% of the occupied fish habitat was correctly classified by the model. Errors were generally small, but occasional large errors did occur and were most frequently associated with barriers to fish movement. Smaller errors occurred in marginal habitats, streams of low topographic relief, and streams that originated from headwater ponds. Use of this type of model, coupled with targeted field survey in areas most likely to be associated with model error, would greatly improve the efficiency and accuracy of current classification schemes.
We compared stream ecosystem responses to two types of disturbances: flood and debris flows. A large storm in February 1996 disturbed four similarly sized sub‐watersheds of the Calapooia River, in the Cascade Mountains of Oregon, USA. All sub‐watersheds had flood and in two, 31 and 81% of the perennial channel, a debris flow affected the channel. For 8 years, we used a suite of approaches: stream temperature, nutrient regime, periphyton and macroinvertebrate assemblages, and resident trout abundance and habitat to evaluate the persistence of instream impacts. Differences in stream temperatures and nitrate‐nitrogen concentrations were evident, probably, due to the removal of vegetation and modification of riparian soils at the debris flow sites. Instream biological responses varied. After the event, fish, including trout, were rare with no fish at the debris flow sites. Within 6 years, trout densities (Oncorhynchus mykiss and Oncorhynchus clarki) were similar and young‐of‐the‐year trouts were common. In contrast, periphyton and macroinvertebrate assemblages differed. Periphyton biomass was lower and nitrogen‐fixing periphyton was more abundant at the debris flow sites. Macroinvertebrate assemblage diversity was higher at the debris flow sites due to fewer dominant taxa. Macroinvertebrate functional feeding groups also differed with fewer gatherers and more scrapers at the debris flow sites. Debris flow impacts related to loss of riparian canopy will probably persist until mature red alder stands are re‐established along stream‐reaches affected by debris flows to provide nitrogen input and shade. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
BackgroundManagers of landscapes dedicated to forest commodity production require information about how practices influence biological diversity. Individual species and communities may be threatened if management practices truncate or simplify forest age classes that are essential for reproduction and survival. For instance, the degradation and loss of complex diverse forest in young age classes have been associated with declines in forest-associated Neotropical migrant bird populations in the Pacific Northwest, USA. These declines may be exacerbated by intensive forest management practices that reduce hardwood and broadleaf shrub cover in order to promote growth of economically valuable tree species in plantations.Methodology and Principal FindingsWe used a Bayesian hierarchical model to evaluate relationships between avian species richness and vegetation variables that reflect stand management intensity (primarily via herbicide application) on 212 tree plantations in the Coast Range, Oregon, USA. Specifically, we estimated the influence of broadleaf hardwood vegetation cover, which is reduced through herbicide applications, on bird species richness and individual species occupancy. Our model accounted for imperfect detection. We used average predictive comparisons to quantify the degree of association between vegetation variables and species richness. Both conifer and hardwood cover were positively associated with total species richness, suggesting that these components of forest stand composition may be important predictors of alpha diversity. Estimates of species richness were 35–80% lower when imperfect detection was ignored (depending on covariate values), a result that has critical implications for previous efforts that have examined relationships between forest composition and species richness.Conclusion and SignificanceOur results revealed that individual and community responses were positively associated with both conifer and hardwood cover. In our system, patterns of bird community assembly appear to be associated with stand management strategies that retain or increase hardwood vegetation while simultaneously regenerating the conifer cover in commercial tree plantations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.