Purpose The aim of this official guideline coordinated and published by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the German Cancer Society (DKG) was to optimize the screening, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of breast cancer. Methods The process of updating the S3 guideline dating from 2012 was based on the adaptation of identified source guidelines which were combined with reviews of evidence compiled using PICO (Patients/Interventions/Control/Outcome) questions and the results of a systematic search of literature databases and the selection and evaluation of the identified literature. The interdisciplinary working groups took the identified materials as their starting point to develop recommendations and statements which were modified and graded in a structured consensus procedure. Recommendations Part 1 of this short version of the guideline presents recommendations for the screening, diagnosis and follow-up care of breast cancer. The importance of mammography for screening is confirmed in this updated version of the guideline and forms the basis for all screening. In addition to the conventional methods used to diagnose breast cancer, computed tomography (CT) is recommended for staging in women with a higher risk of recurrence. The follow-up concept includes suggested intervals between physical, ultrasound and mammography examinations, additional high-tech diagnostic procedures, and the determination of tumor markers for the evaluation of metastatic disease.

Purpose The aim of this official guideline coordinated and published by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the German Cancer Society (DKG) was to optimize the screening, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of breast cancer. Method The process of updating the S3 guideline published in 2012 was based on the adaptation of identified source guidelines. They were combined with reviews of evidence compiled using PICO (Patients/Interventions/Control/Outcome) questions and with the results of a systematic search of literature databases followed by the selection and evaluation of the identified literature. The interdisciplinary working groups took the identified materials as their starting point and used them to develop suggestions for recommendations and statements, which were then modified and graded in a structured consensus process procedure. Recommendations Part 2 of this short version of the guideline presents recommendations for the therapy of primary, recurrent and metastatic breast cancer. Loco-regional therapies are de-escalated in the current guideline. In addition to reducing the safety margins for surgical procedures, the guideline also recommends reducing the radicality of axillary surgery. The choice and extent of systemic therapy depends on the respective tumor biology. New substances are becoming available, particularly to treat metastatic breast cancer.

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Door-to-CT scan time (DCT) and door-to-needle time (DNT) are important process measures in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). We examined the impact of a telemedical prenotification by emergency medical service (EMS) (called the “Stroke Angel” program) on DCT and DNT and IVT rate compared to standard of care. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> Two prospective observational studies including AIS patients admitted via EMS from 2011 to 2013 (cohort I; <i>n</i> = 496) and from January 1, 2015 to May 31, 2018 (cohort II; <i>n</i> = 349) were conducted. After cohort I, the 4-Item Stroke Scale and a digital thrombolysis protocol were added. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analysis was performed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In cohort I, DCT was lower in the intervention group (13 vs. 26 min using standard of care; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), but no significant difference in median DNT (35 vs. 39 min; <i>p</i> = 0.24) was observed. In cohort II, a reduction of DCT (8 vs. 15 min; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and DNT (25 vs. 29 min <i>p</i> = 0.003) was observed in the intervention group. Compared to standard of care, the likelihood of DCT ≤10 min or DNT ≤20 min in the intervention group was 2.7 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.7; 95% CI: 2.1–3.5) and 1.8 (aOR 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1–2.9), respectively. In cohort II, IVT rate was higher (aOR 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1–1.9) in the intervention group. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Although the positive effects of Stroke Angel in AIS provided a rationale for implementation in routine care, larger studies of practice implementation will be needed. Using Stroke Angel in the prehospital management of AIS impacts on important process measures of IVT delivery.

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Die außerklinische Intensivversorgung von Menschen mit Langzeitbeatmung ist ein stark anwachsender Bereich mit vielseitigen Versorgungsbedarfen. Ziel dieses Scoping Reviews ist es, den aktuellen Forschungsstand zur Qualität der Versorgung beatmeter Menschen in der außerstationären Intensivpflege in Deutschland darzustellen und Forschungslücken aufzudecken. Methode Anhand definierter Einschlusskriterien wurden 4 Datenbanken nach Publikationen zur Versorgung von außerklinisch beatmeten Menschen in Deutschland durchsucht. Datenextraktion und Synthese erfolgten nach der Methode der „data driven thematic analysis“. Eine Differenzierung zwischen Forschung und Expertenmeinung fand statt. Ergebnisse Die Suche ergab 493 Treffer, von denen insgesamt 68 Publikationen eingeschlossen wurden, darunter 2 Leitlinien (3%), 45 (66%) Forschungsarbeiten und 21 (31%) Expertenmeinungen. Inhaltlich konnten folgende Themenfelder identifiziert werden: Organisation und Steuerung der Beatmung (n=43; 63%), pflegerische (n=23; 34%), medizinische (n=39; 57%), therapeutische (n=7; 10%) und Hilfsmittelversorgung (n=24; 35%), sowie die Sicht beatmeter Personen und deren Angehörigen (n=33; 49%) und weitere Themen (n=13; 19%). Schlussfolgerung Obwohl der Qualitätsdiskurs zur Versorgung beatmeter Personen in der außerklinischen Intensivpflege breit geführt wird, fehlen Studien zur Bedarfsgerechtigkeit von Versorgungsleistungen, zu Selbstbestimmung und Teilhabe in Abhängigkeit der Wohnform oder zur Rolle einzelner ‚Health Professionals‘ im interprofessionellen Team.