Purpose To determine if multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging mapping can be used to quantify the response to loading of histologically intact human knee cartilage. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. Twenty macroscopically intact cartilage-bone samples were obtained from the central lateral femoral condyles in 11 patients undergoing total knee replacement. A clinical 3.0-T MR imaging system was used to generate T1, T1ρ, T2, and T2* maps with inversion recovery, spin-lock multiple gradient-echo, multiple spin-echo, and multiple gradient-echo sequences. Serial mapping was performed at three defined strain levels (strain 0 [δ], 0%; strain 1 [δ], 19.8% ± 4.6 [standard deviation]; strain 2 [δ], 39.5% ± 9.3) by using displacement-controlled static indentation loading. The entire sample and specific cartilage zones (superficial zone [SZ], transitional zone [TZ], and deep zone [DZ]) and regions (subpistonal area [SPA] and peripistonal area [PPA]) were defined as regions of interest. Upon log transformation, repeated measures analysis of variance was used to detect groupwise regional and zonal differences. Load-induced relative changes were determined and analyzed by using paired Student t test and Spearman correlation. Biomechanical testing (unconfined compression) and histologic assessment (Mankin score) served as the reference standard. Results All samples were histologically intact. Strain-related decreases were found at the SZ and TZ for T1 and T2*; for T1ρ, increases were seen in all zones; and for T2, increases were seen at the SZ and PPA only. Significant parameter changes in the entire sample depth of SPA versus PPA were found for δ (T1ρ, 14% ± 12 vs 6% ± 9) and δ (T1, -4% ± 5 vs -1% ± 3; T1ρ, 13% ± 12 vs 7% ± 7; T2*, -9% ± 12 vs -2% ± 8). SPA versus PPA changes were significant at the SZ and TZ (T1), TZ and DZ (T1ρ), and SZ (T2*). No significant correlations were found between relative changes and biomechanical or histologic parameters. Conclusion Serial multiparametric MR imaging mapping can be used to evaluate cartilage beyond mere static analysis and may provide the basis for more refined graduation strategies of cartilage degeneration. RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

This study develops an objective breast symmetry evaluation using 3-D surface imaging (Konica-Minolta V910(®) scanner) by superimposing the mirrored left breast over the right and objectively determining the mean 3-D contour difference between the 2 breast surfaces. 3 observers analyzed the evaluation protocol precision using 2 dummy models (n = 60), 10 test subjects (n = 300), clinically tested it on 30 patients (n = 900) and compared it to established 2-D measurements on 23 breast reconstructive patients using the BCCT.core software (n = 690). Mean 3-D evaluation precision, expressed as the coefficient of variation (VC), was 3.54 ± 0.18 for all human subjects without significant intra- and inter-observer differences (p > 0.05). The 3-D breast symmetry evaluation is observer independent, significantly more precise (p < 0.001) than the BCCT.core software (VC = 6.92 ± 0.88) and may play a part in an objective surgical outcome analysis after incorporation into clinical practice.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution-NonCo mmercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.